1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm | The A72 is slightly taller and wider, while both phones have almost the same thickness, meaning similar hand feel. |
| Weight | 203g | 205g | Both phones feel almost identical in hand, not a major difference. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.7" | 6.74" | Negligible difference in screen size; both offer a large viewing experience. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1212x2616 | The Mate 50 Pro's higher resolution will offer slightly sharper images and text, especially when viewing high-resolution content. |
| PPI | 394 | 428 | The Mate 50 Pro provides a marginally crisper display due to higher pixel density. |
| Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Similar vibrant colors and deep blacks. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | The Mate 50 Pro's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 0 nits | The A72 provides much better screen visibility in bright outdoor conditions. The Huawei Mate 50 Pro brightness value is missing from provided data, making it impossible to compare. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) | The Mate 50 Pro offers significantly faster performance, leading to smoother app loading, multitasking, and gaming. |
| AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 1,022,043 | The Mate 50 Pro is dramatically faster for demanding tasks, indicating a substantial performance advantage. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 730 | The Mate 50 Pro provides superior graphics performance for gaming and graphics-intensive apps. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 0.80µm | 50MP, f/1.4, 1.00µm | The Mate 50 Pro's main camera has a wider aperture, which allows better low-light performance and larger pixels for improved light capture, despite lower resolution than A72. |
| Telephoto/Portrait Camera | 8MP, f/2.4, 1.00µm | N/A | The A72 has a dedicated telephoto lens for zooming and portrait photography. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 0.80µm | 13MP, f/2.4, pixel size not specified | The A72 has a much higher resolution selfie camera and wider aperture. |
| Telephoto Lens | N/A | 64MP, f/3.5, 0.70µm | The Mate 50 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens for zooming capabilities. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 12MP, f/2.2, pixel size not specified | Both offer similar wide-angle capabilities. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | N/A | The A72 has a macro lens for close-up shots. |
| Video | Up to 4K@60fps | Up to 4K@60fps + 1080p options incl. high FPS | The Mate 50 Pro offers a wider range of high FPS video options, including a slow-motion option up to 3840fps. |
| DxOMark Score | Mobile: 92, Photo:100, Video: 78 | Mobile: 149, Photo: 152, Video: 141, Selfie: 145, Photo: 147, Video: 143 | The Mate 50 Pro has a significantly better camera system based on DxOMark testing, particularly in video recording. The Mate 50 Pro was also tested for its selfie performance with outstanding scores. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 4700mAh | The A72 has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering slightly longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 66W Fast Charging | The Mate 50 Pro charges much faster than the A72. |
| Features | 15W Fast Charger | 50W Wireless charging, reverse charging | The Mate 50 Pro offers fast wireless charging and reverse charging for added convenience. The A72 comes with a 15W fast charger, which is included in the box. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Brighter Display: Significantly better screen visibility under bright sunlight.
- Dedicated Telephoto and Macro Cameras: Provides more versatility in photography.
- Dolby Atmos: Potentially better sound experience with surround sound.
- Slightly larger battery: May offer marginally longer battery life.
- Included charger: Charger included in the box.
Huawei Mate 50 Pro Advantages:
- Much Faster Performance: Top-tier chipset for smoother multitasking and demanding applications.
- Superior Camera Quality: Higher DxOMark scores indicate better image and video quality, especially in low-light situations.
- Faster Charging: Significantly faster wired charging and wireless charging.
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations.
- Better Video Recording Capabilities: Offers a wider range of video capabilities, incl. HDR.
- More satellite systems: Better location accuracy with GPS.
- More Bluetooth Audio Codecs: Supports higher-quality audio codecs for wireless headphones.
- Barometer: Includes a barometer for environmental sensing.
- Higher Storage Options: Comes in 256GB and 512GB models
Trade-offs:
- The A72 sacrifices raw performance and camera quality for a brighter display, dedicated macro and telephoto lenses.
- The Mate 50 Pro offers significantly better performance and camera quality, sacrificing a slightly smaller battery and lacking macro and portrait cameras. The brightness of its display is also unknown, and may perform poorly under bright sunlight.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72 Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize a brighter display for outdoor use.
- Users who enjoy taking a variety of close-up and zoomed photos with dedicated macro and telephoto lenses.
- Users who need a phone with good battery life.
- Users who want good audio quality with Dolby Atmos.
- Users who value the convenience of a charger included in the box.
- Users on a tighter budget.
Use Cases for A72:
- Outdoor photography enthusiasts.
- Users who spend a lot of time outside.
- Everyday photography with various zoom options.
- Casual users who value ease of use and battery life.
- Users who want a complete package out of the box.
Huawei Mate 50 Pro Ideal User:
- Users who want the best performance and camera experience.
- Users who regularly engage in heavy multitasking or gaming.
- Users who need fast charging speeds, both wired and wireless.
- Users who want the best video recording performance with a wide range of options, including high frame rates.
- Users who demand top-notch location accuracy.
- Users who want higher storage capacity.
Use Cases for Mate 50 Pro:
- Mobile gamers who need optimal performance.
- Photography enthusiasts who need top-of-the-line camera quality.
- Users who film videos regularly.
- Power users who need a fast phone for intensive tasks.
- Travelers who require highly accurate GPS.
- Users who need fast charging.
- Users who require large internal storage.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- How important is raw performance to you? If performance is paramount, the Mate 50 Pro is the clear winner.
- Do you prioritize camera quality or camera versatility? If you want better picture quality, the Mate 50 Pro's camera is better, however, if you need specific cameras, the A72 has a dedicated macro and telephoto lens.
- How important is fast charging and bright display to you? The Mate 50 Pro has very fast charging, while the A72 has significantly better display brightness.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For the Casual User on a budget: If you need a reliable phone with a good display and camera that is suitable for everyday use, the A72 is the better choice.
- For the Mobile Photographer/Videographer: If you want the best photo and video quality, choose the Mate 50 Pro despite its lack of a dedicated macro and telephoto cameras.
- For the Power User: If you need top-tier performance and fast charging, the Mate 50 Pro is the clear choice.
- For the Outdoor User: If a bright, legible display in daylight is critical, the A72 may be preferable, as there is no data about the Mate 50 Pro's screen brightness.
My Choice
I would choose the Huawei Mate 50 Pro. While the Samsung Galaxy A72 offers a brighter display and a few more camera options, the sheer performance difference, and superior camera capabilities of the Mate 50 Pro, as shown by the DxOMark scores, make it the more compelling option for me. I value performance and camera quality above all else, and the Mate 50 Pro delivers a significantly better experience in those areas. The faster charging, and higher storage options, are also nice bonuses. Although the lack of a dedicated macro lens might be a small drawback, the Mate 50 Pro's excellent main and telephoto camera systems, including its 64MP telephoto lens, more than compensate for that. The unknown brightness of the screen may be a problem, but the overall package and performance are better.
