1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Honor 200 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Size | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm | 163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2 mm | The A72 is slightly larger, which might make it feel bulkier, while the 200 Pro is more compact. |
| Weight | 203g | 199g | Both phones have a similar weight, unlikely to be noticeable in hand. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Honor 200 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.7" | 6.78" | Negligible difference; both offer a large viewing experience. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1224x2700 | The 200 Pro will have a sharper and more detailed display, especially noticeable when reading text. |
| PPI | 394 | 437 | Slightly crisper image on the 200 Pro, but differences may not be very apparent to some users. |
| Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks; negligible difference in the tech used. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | The 200 Pro will have smoother scrolling and animations, making it feel more responsive. |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 4000 nits | The 200 Pro will be much more visible in direct sunlight and bright conditions. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Honor 200 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | The 200 Pro offers significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and much better gaming performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 1,537,608 | The 200 Pro is dramatically faster, suitable for demanding tasks and future-proofing. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 735 | The 200 Pro has a much more powerful GPU for better graphics performance in gaming and demanding apps. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Honor 200 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 0.80µm | 50MP, f/1.95, 1/1.3", 1.00µm | The A72 offers a slightly higher resolution main sensor, but the 200 Pro has a larger sensor and pixels, likely better low-light performance. |
| Telephoto+Portrait | 8MP, f/2.4, 1/4.4", 1.00µm | N/A | The A72 offers a dedicated telephoto lens for zoomed photos and portrait mode; the Honor 200 Pro lacks a dedicated telephoto portrait lens. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 0.80µm | 50MP, f/2.1 | The 200 Pro has a higher resolution selfie camera with a wider aperture, likely leading to better self-portraits, especially in low light. |
| Telephoto Lens | N/A | 50MP, f/2.4, Sony IMX856 | The 200 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens for zoomed photos; the A72 lacks a dedicated telephoto lens. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 12MP, f/2.2 | Both offer similar wide-angle capabilities, though the pixel size for the Honor 200 Pro is missing, so that cannot be compared. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | N/A | The A72 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography; the 200 Pro lacks a dedicated macro lens. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps EIS, 1080p@30/60fps EIS, slow-motion 120fps | 4K@30fps OIS,EIS, 1080p@30/60fps OIS,EIS, slow-motion 240fps | Both record 4K video but the 200 Pro has OIS in addition to EIS on all frame rates, leading to more stable videos; has higher slow-motion fps. |
| DXOMARK Score | Mobile: 92 Photo: 100 Video: 78 | Not Available | Only the Samsung Galaxy A72 is scored on DXOMARK, suggesting that it may be a superior camera. |
| Camera Features | Digital zoom, Optical zoom, Quadruple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night Mode | 4K Video, Digital zoom, Optical zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous autofocus, Manual focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Dual front camera, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night Mode | The 200 Pro offers more video features such as ultra stable video, autofocus, and has RAW image support for editing. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Honor 200 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5200mAh | A slight increase in battery capacity for the 200 Pro could lead to marginally longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 100W fast charging | The 200 Pro will charge significantly faster, reducing wait times. |
| Features | 15W Charger included | 66W Wireless Charging, Reverse charging | The 200 Pro offers faster wireless charging and the ability to charge other devices. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Dedicated Macro Lens: Provides a lens for close up photography.
- Dedicated Telephoto + Portrait Lens: Provides a lens for zooming and portrait photography, which could be preferred by some users compared to a telephoto lens.
- DXOMARK Score: Has been scored on DXOMARK, giving the camera a baseline rating compared to the 200 Pro, which is currently unavailable.
Practical Implications: The A72 offers versatility in photography with its macro, telephoto, and wide angle lenses. The camera offers a baseline as given by DXOMARK.
Honor 200 Pro Advantages:
- Significantly Higher Performance: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is much faster than the Snapdragon 720G, leading to a much smoother and more responsive experience.
- Superior Display: Higher resolution, pixel density, refresh rate, and brightness make it better for everyday use, especially in sunlight.
- Faster Charging: 100W wired charging and 66W wireless charging drastically reduce charging times, which is more convenient.
- Better Video Stability: Has OIS along with EIS, making video more smooth than the A72, which only has EIS.
- More Future-Proof: Newer chipset and software, as well as connectivity technology mean the Honor 200 Pro is a more future-proof purchase than the A72.
- Telephoto Lens: Offers a telephoto lens that may be preferrable to users over a portrait lens.
- Better Selfie Camera: Offers a higher resolution and wider aperture for more detailed selfies, especially in low light.
- More storage: The 200 Pro offers significantly more internal storage for users (1024GB).
Practical Implications: The Honor 200 Pro is much faster, more responsive, has a brighter and more detailed display, and charges much quicker, leading to an improved user experience. It is a more future-proof device and is more useful for videography due to better image stabilization. The 200 Pro offers more storage, which may be helpful to some users.
Trade-offs:
- The Samsung Galaxy A72 offers a dedicated Macro and Telephoto + Portrait lens, which are not available on the Honor 200 Pro. However, the Honor 200 Pro offers a telephoto lens for zoomed in pictures.
- The Honor 200 Pro lacks a macro lens.
- The Samsung Galaxy A72 only has an EIS system for video, whereas the 200 Pro has EIS and OIS.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72 Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize photography versatility: Specifically, users who desire a macro camera for close-up photography and a dedicated portrait lens may prefer this device.
- Users on a tighter budget: Likely to be more affordable than the Honor 200 Pro, although not specifically mentioned in the provided data.
- Users who prioritize a tested camera system: DXOMARK scores provide a solid idea of the camera system on this device, whereas that information is not available for the 200 Pro.
Use Cases:
- Taking a variety of photos using its different camera lenses.
- General everyday use and not demanding tasks, where performance is less important.
Honor 200 Pro Ideal User:
- Performance-focused users: Gamers, heavy multitaskers, or anyone who wants a fast and responsive experience.
- Users who need a great display: Ideal for media consumption, outdoor use, and those who prioritize screen quality.
- Users who prioritize charging speed: People who need a fast charging phone for frequent use or travel.
- Users who want future-proof device: The latest and greatest processor and connectivity make it a more future-proof option.
- Users who need a device with more storage: Has up to 1024GB of internal storage, which is useful for storing large video and photo libraries.
Use Cases:
- Playing graphics-intensive games.
- Watching movies and videos.
- Using many apps simultaneously.
- Frequent use of the camera, especially for video and self-portraits.
- Travel, where quick charging is necessary.
- Extensive media storage.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- Without price information, it's difficult to assess the price-to-value ratio precisely. However, the Honor 200 Pro likely has a higher price tag given the newer generation processor, higher display and charging technologies. Users must assess their own budget constraints and weigh it against the technical advancements of the 200 Pro compared to the A72.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is raw performance and responsiveness? If you want a fast and smooth experience, the Honor 200 Pro is the clear winner.
- How important is display quality and brightness for daily use? The Honor 200 Pro's display is significantly better, especially in bright conditions.
- Are you a heavy user that requires fast charging speeds or versatility in photography? The Honor 200 Pro charges much faster, whereas the A72 offers more versatility in its lenses.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget-Conscious User, Basic Use: If the price is significantly lower, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is adequate for general use, despite lacking performance and display quality.
- Performance and Display Enthusiast: The Honor 200 Pro is the obvious choice for its superior performance, display quality, and charging capabilities.
- Photography Focused User: If a macro and a portrait lens are needed, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is a good choice. For a better telephoto experience and better low light selfie results, the Honor 200 Pro is a better choice.
My Choice
Given the information, I would choose the Honor 200 Pro. The much superior chipset, display, and charging speed make the user experience noticeably better. The 200 Pro also has better video capabilities and more storage, which are all highly desirable features for me. While the Samsung Galaxy A72 offers a macro lens and a telephoto + portrait lens, the superior chipset, display, and charging speed of the 200 Pro outweigh these advantages. Additionally, the 200 Pro offers a telephoto lens, which I find to be better than a portrait lens. The 200 Pro is a clear winner for a performance and modern features driven user.
