Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Oppo Reno12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 102.25 cm³ 90.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.79 "/g
Weight 213 g 177 g
Height 161.1 mm 161.4 mm
Width 77.4 mm 74.1 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Matte Brown
  • Sunset Pink
  • Astro Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.9 mAh/cm³ 55.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1480 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Xclipse 530 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A55Oppo Reno12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.1x77.4x8.2mm161.4x74.1x7.6mmReno12 is slightly narrower, thinner, and lighter, potentially improving one-handed use.
Weight213g177gReno12 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
ColorsNavy, Iceblue, Lilac, LemonMatte Brown, Sunset Pink, Astro SilverPrimarily a matter of personal preference.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+Both offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Reno12's 1B colors might offer slightly smoother color gradients, but the difference would be subtle for most users.
Resolution1080x23401080x2412Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1200 nitsReno12's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. A55's lack of specified peak brightness makes direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1480 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)Both are 4nm chips, suggesting comparable power efficiency. Performance differences would need benchmarking.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55 has slightly higher clock speeds on its performance cores, potentially offering a slight edge in demanding tasks. Real-world performance differences may be minimal.
GPUXclipse 530Mali-G615 MC2Performance differences would depend on specific game/app optimization. Requires further benchmarking for accurate comparison.
RAM/Storage256GB/8GB, 256GB/12GB512GB/12GBReno12 offers a larger storage option, beneficial for users storing large files or many apps.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS)Up to 4K@30fps (HDR, OIS, EIS), slow-motion up to 960fpsReno12 offers significantly more advanced video features, including OIS for more stable footage and higher frame rate slow-motion options.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity suggests similar battery life, although real-world usage will vary depending on other factors.
Software
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both launch with the latest Android version.
Max OS Version1817A55 is promised longer software updates, providing security and feature updates for a longer period.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates to Android 18 provide a longer lifespan and better security in the long run.
  • Potentially Faster CPU: Slightly higher clock speeds might translate to better performance in demanding applications.

Oppo Reno12 Advantages:

  • Superior Video Recording: OIS, HDR, and high frame rate slow-motion offer significantly better video recording capabilities.
  • Lighter and Slimmer Design: Noticeably more comfortable to hold and use, especially for extended periods.
  • Brighter Display: Improved outdoor visibility.
  • Larger Storage Option: The 512GB option caters to users with high storage demands.

Trade-offs:

  • The A55 potentially sacrifices video features and design for longer software support and slightly higher CPU clock speeds.
  • The Reno12 potentially sacrifices a year of software updates for superior camera capabilities and a more refined design.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who prioritize long-term software support and value receiving updates for a longer period.

Oppo Reno12: Users who prioritize camera capabilities, especially video recording, and prefer a lighter, sleeker design. Content creators and social media enthusiasts would benefit from the Reno12's advanced video features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is long-term software support? If receiving updates for the longest possible time is crucial, the A55 is the better choice.
  2. What is your primary use case for the camera? For casual photography, both phones may suffice. However, for serious video recording, the Reno12 is significantly better.
  3. How important is the phone's physical design and weight? If a lightweight and comfortable phone is a priority, the Reno12 is preferred.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a budget needing a long-lasting phone: Samsung Galaxy A55.
  • Content creator focusing on video: Oppo Reno12.
  • User who prioritizes a comfortable in-hand feel and excellent display: Oppo Reno12.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.