Samsung Galaxy A54 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 202 g 189 g
Height 158.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6A54 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)202189A75 is noticeably lighter.
BuildMaterial specifications missing for both phones, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCDA54 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size6.4"6.6"A75 has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1612A54 has a significantly sharper display (403 ppi vs 267 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzA54 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)A54's 5nm chipset will likely offer significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)A54 boasts faster core speeds, translating to quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G57 MP1A54's GPU is more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM8GB4GB/8GBA54's 8GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking, especially with demanding apps. A75 offers a 4GB variant which may struggle with heavy usage.
Camera
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766)50MPA54 utilizes a known high-quality sensor (IMX766), likely resulting in superior image quality. Sensor details missing for A75.
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsA54 offers higher resolution video recording and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging25W22.5WA54 offers slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, and faster refresh rate provide a dramatically better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful chipset, CPU, and GPU lead to smoother operation, faster app loading, and better gaming capabilities.
  • Potentially Better Camera: The utilization of a known high-quality sensor (Sony IMX766) suggests better image quality compared to the A75, although detailed sensor information for the A75 is missing.
  • More Polished Software Experience: Samsung's One UI generally offers more features and refinements compared to stock Android.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower Price: The A75 is positioned in the low price range, making it a more budget-friendly option.
  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Larger Storage Option: Offers a 256GB storage option, beneficial for users who store lots of media.

Trade-offs:

  • A75 sacrifices performance, display quality, and potentially camera quality for affordability.
  • A54 comes at a higher price for its premium features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, a good camera, and a smooth user experience. Suitable for:

  • Mobile Gamers: The powerful GPU and 120Hz display enhance gaming.
  • Content Consumers: The vibrant AMOLED screen is ideal for watching videos and browsing photos.
  • Power Users: The efficient chipset and ample RAM handle multitasking with ease.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Budget-conscious users who primarily need a basic smartphone for communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Suitable for:

  • Casual Users: Less demanding users who prioritize affordability.
  • First-time Smartphone Users: A simple and budget-friendly entry point into the smartphone world.
  • Users needing ample storage: The 256GB option caters to users who store a lot of data locally.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A75 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Gaming, media consumption, or basic communication?
  3. How important are display quality and performance? The A54 excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Balanced Needs and Budget: Samsung Galaxy A54 (base storage option)
  • Performance and Premium Features are Priority: Samsung Galaxy A54

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A54

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers an attractive price point, the Samsung Galaxy A54 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior AMOLED display, powerful performance, and likely better camera make it a worthwhile investment. The smoother 120Hz refresh rate, faster processor, and higher resolution screen are crucial for a satisfying day-to-day user experience. While I acknowledge the A75's value for budget-conscious buyers, the A54's advantages in key areas make it the clear winner for me. The improved user experience justifies the price difference in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.