Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 September 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 106.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 202 g 199 g
Height 158.2 mm 161.4 mm
Width 76.7 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Midnight Black (Fushion Black)
  • Moonlight White (Fushion White)
  • Aurora Purple
  • Fushion Purple
  • Camo Green

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 89.7 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9Redmi is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)202199Negligible weight difference.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.67Redmi offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401220 x 2712Redmi has a sharper display with higher resolution, resulting in finer details.
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors, but Redmi boasts Dolby Vision and higher peak brightness (1800 nits vs unknown for A54) for better HDR performance in bright conditions.
PPI403446Redmi's higher PPI contributes to its sharper display.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm)Both are mid-range chipsets, but benchmarks suggest Dimensity 7200 Ultra offers a performance advantage.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Dimensity 7200 Ultra's newer architecture likely results in better performance and efficiency.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G610 MC4While both are capable GPUs, Mali-G68 MP5 in the A54 generally performs better in benchmarks for gaming.
RAM (GB)88/12/16Redmi offers configurations with higher RAM, enabling better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50200Redmi has a significantly higher megapixel count on its main camera potentially capturing more detail, but higher megapixel count doesn't guarantee better image quality.
Front Camera (MP)3216A54 has a higher resolution front camera for selfies.
DXOMARK Score107121Redmi scores significantly higher in DXOMARK tests, indicating better overall camera performance.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both phones have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)25120Redmi supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Potentially better GPU: The Mali-G68 MP5 might offer a smoother gaming experience compared to Redmi's Mali-G610 MC4, despite the latter's overall performance advantage.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Offers potentially more detailed selfies.
  • Proven Track Record: Samsung's established reputation for software updates and device reliability.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and PPI resulting in a more detailed visual experience.
  • More Powerful CPU: Dimensity 7200 Ultra likely provides better overall performance for demanding tasks.
  • Significantly Faster Charging: 120W fast charging drastically reduces charging time.
  • Higher DXOMARK Camera Score: Indicates potentially superior camera performance across various scenarios.
  • Dolby Vision: Enhanced HDR experience for compatible content.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users prioritizing a reliable device from a well-established brand with a potentially better GPU for gaming and good selfie camera.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Users who value performance, a sharp display with vibrant colors and HDR capabilities, extremely fast charging, and a high-performing camera.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? While both are mid-range, Redmi's higher-end configurations can be more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (e.g., gaming, photography, content consumption)
  3. How important is fast charging?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer on a budget: Galaxy A54
  • Photography enthusiast: Redmi Note 13 Pro+
  • User needing fastest charging: Redmi Note 13 Pro+

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+

While the A54 is a solid device, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a more compelling overall package. The significantly faster charging, sharper display with Dolby Vision, higher overall performance thanks to the Dimensity 7200 Ultra, and higher DXOMARK camera score outweigh the A54's advantages for me. The slightly larger size isn't a significant drawback, and while GPU performance might be slightly lower on the Redmi, the overall CPU advantage likely compensates for most users. The significantly faster charging is a major convenience in today's fast-paced world. Finally, the improved camera system as indicated by the DXOMARK score is a compelling factor for anyone who values photography.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.