Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 September 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 95.69 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 202 g 187 g
Height 158.2 mm 161.2 mm
Width 76.7 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Midnight Black
  • Arctic White
  • Olive Green
  • Aurora Purple (Coral Purple)
  • Ocean Teal
  • Scarlet Red

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 114.64 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 53.3 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5100 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2161.2 x 74.2 x 8.0Redmi is slightly taller and narrower. Negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)202187Redmi is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildMaterial not specified for either phone, limiting comparison.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.67Redmi offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 23401220 x 2712Redmi has a sharper display due to higher resolution and pixel density.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to 120Hz. AMOLED ensures vibrant colors and deep blacks. Redmi's potential advantage in color accuracy with 68B colors needs further validation in real-world testing. Redmi's higher peak brightness (1800 nits vs. unspecified for A54) will provide significantly better visibility in direct sunlight.
HDRHDR10+Dolby VisionWhile both support HDR, Dolby Vision on the Redmi generally offers better dynamic range and color accuracy if content supports it.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Both are mid-range chipsets. Performance differences would need benchmarking. Snapdragon's 4nm process might offer slight power efficiency benefits.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Very similar CPU configurations. Minor clock speed differences likely won't translate to noticeable real-world performance gaps.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Adreno 710Different GPUs. Real-world gaming performance needs further comparison through benchmarks and reviews.
RAM (GB)88/12/16Redmi offers configurations with more RAM, potentially benefitting multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50200Redmi boasts a significantly higher megapixel count on the main sensor. However, megapixels alone don't guarantee better image quality. Sensor size and processing play a crucial role. Redmi's larger sensor (1/1.4") should perform better in low light.
Ultrawide (MP)138A54 has a higher resolution ultrawide.
Selfie (MP)3216A54 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fpsBoth can record 4K video. Redmi offers 1080p@120fps slow-motion, while A54 offers 720p@480fps.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005100Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)2567Redmi supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime considerably.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • More affordable: Generally priced lower than the Redmi Note 13 Pro.
  • Potentially longer software support: Samsung has improved its software update track record.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Advantages:

  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging with 67W.
  • Larger, Sharper Display: Bigger screen with higher resolution and peak brightness.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 200MP sensor with larger sensor size, potentially better low-light performance. More RAM in higher configurations.
  • Dolby Vision: Enhanced HDR experience for compatible content.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Budget-conscious users prioritizing affordability and decent all-around performance.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro: Users who value a large, bright, and sharp display, fast charging, and a high-resolution camera. Suitable for multimedia consumption, gaming, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What's your budget? The A54 is generally more affordable.
  2. What are your display priorities? The Redmi Note 13 Pro has a larger, sharper, and brighter display.
  3. How important is fast charging? The Redmi Note 13 Pro charges significantly faster.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro

While pricing can vary, the Redmi Note 13 Pro offers compelling advantages in key areas like display, charging, and potentially camera performance (needs real-world reviews to confirm) that outweigh the slightly higher price for me. The significantly faster charging and larger, brighter, and sharper display are significant quality-of-life improvements. The 200MP main camera with a larger sensor also holds potential for excellent photography, although real-world reviews are needed to confirm this. The A54 is a good budget option, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro offers a more premium experience in crucial aspects.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.