Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 202 g 205 g
Height 158.2 mm 168.6 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Midnight Black
  • Pink
  • Ocean Blue
  • Sandy Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 550 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Xiaomi Redmi 13Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3Redmi 13 is noticeably taller and slightly thicker. A54 might be more pocketable.
Weight (g)202205Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
BuildMissingMissingBuild quality and materials cannot be compared due to missing information.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCDA54 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.46.79Redmi 13 has a larger screen, providing more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2460Similar pixel density, but Redmi 13's slightly larger screen offers marginally more screen real estate.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090A54's 120Hz provides smoother animations and scrolling compared to Redmi 13's 90Hz.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12nm)A54's 5nm chipset should offer better performance and power efficiency compared to Redmi 13's 12nm chipset.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x2.0 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)A54 likely has a performance advantage due to faster core speeds and potentially better architecture.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G52 MC2A54's GPU is expected to deliver significantly better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8GB8GBBoth phones offer sufficient RAM for multitasking in this price range.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi 13 ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.
Camera
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766)108MPRedmi 13 has a higher megapixel count, but sensor size and other factors also impact image quality. A54 uses a known high-quality sensor (IMX766).
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsA54 supports 4K video recording, offering higher resolution videos compared to Redmi 13's 1080p.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005030Negligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on various factors, including display, chipset, and software.
Fast Charging25W33WRedmi 13 supports faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology provides vibrant colors and deeper blacks. The 120Hz refresh rate offers a smoother user experience.
  • Better Performance: More efficient and powerful chipset and GPU for smoother gaming and multitasking.
  • Higher Quality Main Camera Sensor: Potentially better image quality in various conditions thanks to the Sony IMX766 sensor.
  • 4K Video Recording: Enables higher resolution video capture.

Xiaomi Redmi 13 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: More immersive experience for media consumption.
  • Newer Android Version: Potentially longer software support and access to the latest features.
  • Faster Charging: Reduces charging time significantly.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

Trade-offs:

  • A54 prioritizes display quality, performance, and camera quality, but comes at a higher price.
  • Redmi 13 prioritizes screen size, faster charging, and affordability, but compromises on display quality, performance, and potentially camera quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users who value a premium display, smooth performance, a capable camera, and are willing to pay a bit more for these features. Ideal for:

  • Mobile gaming enthusiasts
  • Content creators who need good video recording capabilities
  • Users who prioritize a vibrant and responsive display

Xiaomi Redmi 13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large screen for media consumption and faster charging. Ideal for:

  • Casual users primarily focused on browsing, social media, and video streaming.
  • Users seeking the best value for their money.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Redmi 13 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and media creation favor the A54, while casual usage favors Redmi 13.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display quality and performance (A54) or screen size and affordability (Redmi 13).

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A54

While the Redmi 13 offers excellent value, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A54. The superior AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, combined with the more powerful processor and higher-quality main camera sensor, significantly enhance the overall user experience. These features are crucial for my usage, which includes gaming, photography, and consuming multimedia content. Although the Redmi 13 has a larger display and faster charging, the A54's advantages in key areas outweigh these benefits for me. The price difference is justifiable for the long-term satisfaction and performance offered by the A54. The known quality of the IMX766 sensor in the A54 also heavily sways my decision as megapixel count alone doesn't determine image quality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.