Samsung Galaxy A54 vs vivo V30 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo V30
vivo V30
Vivo

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 March 4, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 92.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 202 g 186 g
Height 158.2 mm 164.4 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Bloom White
  • Waving Aqua
  • Lush Green
  • Noble Black

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54vivo V30Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5V30 is taller and slightly narrower, but thinner. A54 might feel slightly smaller in hand.
Weight (g)202186V30 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.78V30 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401260 x 2800V30 has a higher resolution and sharper display, especially noticeable when viewing high-resolution content.
Panel TypeSuper AMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Real-world difference in quality might be minimal for average users.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both provide smooth scrolling and animations.
PPI403453V30's higher pixel density results in sharper text and images.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is generally considered more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother gaming, and better overall performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Snapdragon 7 Gen 3's newer architecture and higher clock speeds provide a performance advantage.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Adreno 720Adreno 720 generally offers better gaming performance and graphics rendering compared to the Mali-G68 MP5.
RAM (GB)88Both offer sufficient RAM for multitasking and smooth performance.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 MP Main, 13 MP Wide, 5 MP Macro50 MP Main, 50 MP WideBoth have high-resolution main sensors. V30 lacks a dedicated macro lens but boasts a high-resolution ultrawide.
Front Camera (MP)32 MP50 MPV30 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsBoth can record 4K video. More detailed video capabilities (e.g., frame rates at different resolutions) are missing for comprehensive comparison.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, although real-world usage can vary.
Fast Charging25W80WV30 offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Potentially More Affordable: Pricing data shows broader availability and potentially lower prices for the A54.
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: Offers dedicated macro photography capabilities, although the low resolution might limit its usefulness.
  • More Color Options: Provides a wider variety of color choices.

vivo V30 Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides a noticeable performance boost over Exynos 1380.
  • Higher Resolution Display: Offers a larger, sharper display with a higher pixel density for a more immersive visual experience.
  • Significantly Faster Charging: 80W fast charging drastically reduces charging time compared to 25W.
  • Higher Resolution Ultrawide and Selfie Cameras: Offers superior ultrawide and selfie camera capabilities due to higher resolution sensors.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and a well-rounded feature set. Suitable for everyday tasks, social media, casual photography, and light gaming.

vivo V30: Users who value performance, a premium display, fast charging, and high-quality cameras. Ideal for mobile gaming, media consumption, demanding multitasking, and capturing high-quality photos and videos.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A54 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? The V30 offers a significant performance advantage.
  3. How important is camera quality and fast charging? The V30 excels in both areas.

My Choice: vivo V30

While the Samsung Galaxy A54 is a solid mid-range phone, the vivo V30 offers a compelling package with its superior performance, stunning display, and incredibly fast charging. The difference in chipset performance (Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs. Exynos 1380) would be noticeable in daily use and especially gaming. The significantly faster 80W charging is a huge convenience. The higher resolution ultrawide and selfie cameras on the V30 are also significant advantages for photography enthusiasts. Although the price difference might be substantial, the V30's advancements in crucial areas justify the higher cost for users who prioritize these features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.