Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 202 g 213 g
Height 158.2 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 is slightly larger and may feel less comfortable in smaller hands.
Weight (g)202213A55 is slightly heavier, but the difference is negligible in daily use.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.6A55 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 23401080 x 2340Identical resolution, but due to the size difference, A54 has a slightly higher pixel density (403 vs ~390 ppi), potentially resulting in slightly sharper text.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Exynos 1480 (4 nm)A55's 4nm process suggests better power efficiency and potentially improved performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55 has faster prime cores, likely resulting in noticeably better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Xclipse 530While specific benchmarks are missing, the Xclipse 530 in the A55 is expected to offer improved graphics performance compared to the Mali-G68 MP5.
RAM (GB)88/12A55 offers a 12GB RAM option, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50 (Sony IMX766)50 (Sony IMX906)A55 utilizes a newer sensor (IMX906), potentially offering improved low-light performance and image quality.
Ultrawide (MP)1313Similar ultrawide cameras, though sensor details for the A55 suggest a slight improvement.
Selfie (MP)3232Both phones have the same selfie camera resolution and sensor.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS, 720p@480fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EISA54 uniquely offers 720p@480fps slow-motion recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and the A55's potentially more efficient chipset.
Charging25W wired25W wiredBoth offer the same wired charging speed. No information on wireless charging is available.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Slightly smaller and lighter: More comfortable for one-handed use.
  • Slightly sharper display: Due to higher pixel density.
  • Higher slow-motion video recording capability (720p@480fps).
  • Potentially lower price: As an older model.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Larger display: More immersive for media consumption.
  • More powerful processor and GPU: Noticeably better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Newer main camera sensor: Potentially improved image quality, particularly in low light.
  • More RAM in some configurations: Improved multitasking capabilities.
  • Newer Android version: Access to the latest features and longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users prioritizing a compact phone, budget-conscious buyers, and those who value super slow-motion video recording.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who prioritize performance, a large display for media consumption, better camera quality, and the latest software features. Users who multitask heavily would benefit from the 12GB RAM option.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A54 is likely to be more affordable.
  2. Do you prioritize performance or portability? The A55 offers significantly better performance, while the A54 is smaller and lighter.
  3. How important is camera quality? The A55 potentially offers a better camera experience, particularly in low light.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the A54 offers a compelling package for its price, the A55's performance gains, newer camera sensor, and larger display make it the more future-proof choice. The improved performance stemming from the Exynos 1480 and potentially the Xclipse 530 GPU is significant for a smooth user experience in the long run. The slightly larger size is a worthwhile trade-off for the added screen real estate, and the newer main camera sensor in the A55 promises better photos. While price is always a factor, the A55's advantages justify the likely price difference for most users seeking a mid-range phone with strong performance and modern features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.