Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Oppo Reno10 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 July 15, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 96.4 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 202 g 185 g
Height 158.2 mm 162.4 mm
Width 76.7 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Ice Blue
  • Silvery Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 51.87 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Oppo Reno10Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2162.4 x 74.2 x 8.0Reno10 is slightly taller and narrower. Negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)202185Reno10 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.7Reno10 offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 23401080 x 2412Similar pixel density; both offer sharp visuals. Reno10's taller aspect ratio might be better for web browsing.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling with 120Hz refresh rate. Samsung's Super AMOLED might offer slightly better blacks and power efficiency. Reno10 boasts higher peak brightness (950 nits vs unknown for A54), significantly improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Both are mid-range chipsets. Performance differences likely minimal for everyday tasks, but benchmarks needed for definitive comparison. Exynos 1380 likely more power-efficient due to 5nm process.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Reno10 has slightly faster clock speeds on performance cores, potentially offering a slight edge in demanding tasks. Real-world difference might be negligible.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G68 MC4A54 has a more powerful GPU, likely leading to better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)88Both offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50 (Sony IMX766)64 (Omnivision OV64B)Reno10 has a higher resolution sensor. Image quality depends on processing, not just megapixels. A54 uses a well-regarded Sony sensor known for good performance.
TelephotoNo dedicated telephoto32MP (2x optical zoom)Reno10 offers optical zoom for better quality zoomed shots. A54 relies on digital zoom.
Ultrawide (MP)138A54 has a slightly higher resolution ultrawide.
Selfie (MP)3232Similar resolution; image quality will depend on sensor and processing.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)2567Reno10 offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Potentially Better Main Camera Image Quality: While Reno10 has higher resolution, A54 utilizes a reputable Sony IMX766 sensor known for good performance.
  • More Powerful GPU: Likely translates to smoother gaming and graphics performance.
  • More Efficient Chipset: 5nm process suggests better battery life compared to Reno10's 6nm chipset.
  • Longer Software Support: Samsung typically provides more OS updates than Oppo.

Oppo Reno10 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Larger Display: Offers a more comfortable and immersive experience.
  • Significantly Faster Charging: 67W fast charging drastically reduces charging time.
  • Dedicated Telephoto Lens: Provides optical zoom for superior zoomed images.
  • Potentially Better Low-light photos: Reno 10 has a wider aperture on its main camera (f/1.7 vs. f/1.8).

Trade-offs:

  • A54's potentially better camera and performance vs. Reno10's faster charging, larger display, and telephoto lens.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users prioritizing camera quality, performance (especially gaming), battery life, and long-term software updates. Suitable for mobile photographers, gamers, and those seeking a reliable device with extended support.

Oppo Reno10: Users valuing a large, bright display, fast charging, lightweight design, and optical zoom capability. Ideal for content consumption, social media enthusiasts, and those who prioritize quick charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget and which phone offers better value within that range?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns (photography, gaming, content consumption)?
  3. How important are features like fast charging, display size, and software updates?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Casual User: Consider the A54 if pricing is significantly lower.
  • Photographer/Gamer: A54's superior GPU and main camera sensor make it a better choice.
  • Content Consumer/Social Media User: Reno10's larger display, faster charging, and telephoto lens are advantageous.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A54

While the Reno10 offers compelling features like faster charging and a telephoto lens, I prioritize long-term performance, consistent camera quality, and extended software updates. The A54's more efficient processor, powerful GPU, and reputable Sony IMX766 sensor suggest a more reliable and future-proof device. Samsung's track record of software updates further strengthens this choice. The slightly smaller display and slower charging are acceptable trade-offs for these advantages. The lack of a dedicated telephoto lens on the A54 is a downside, but I value the likely overall better image quality provided by the main camera sensor.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.