Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Motorola Moto G24 Power - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 February 7, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 109.63 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 202 g 197 g
Height 158.2 mm 163.5 mm
Width 76.7 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Glacier Blue
  • Ink Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 537 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 139.43 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 54.73 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Motorola Moto G24 PowerPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2163.5 x 74.5 x 9A54 is slightly smaller and thinner. G24 Power might feel bulkier.
Weight (g)202197Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedDurability and premium feel cannot be assessed.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCDA54 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency. G24 Power's LCD might appear washed out in comparison.
Display Size (inches)6.46.56G24 Power has a slightly larger screen, offering more viewing area.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1612A54 has a significantly sharper display (403 ppi vs 269 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090A54's 120Hz display will provide smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm)A54's 5nm chipset offers significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the 12nm Helio G85. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming on the A54.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.7 GHz A55)A54 has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster processing speeds.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G52 MC2A54 has a more powerful GPU, delivering better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)88Both phones have the same amount of RAM, which should be sufficient for most tasks.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50 (Sony IMX766)50A54 utilizes a known high-quality sensor (Sony IMX766), likely resulting in better image quality. Sensor details lacking for the G24 Power.
Ultrawide (MP)132A54 offers a much wider and more usable ultrawide camera.
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsA54 can record higher resolution videos with electronic image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50006000G24 Power has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Fast Charging25W33WG24 Power offers faster charging speeds despite having a larger battery.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology with higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness provides a much better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Quality Camera System: The use of a known high-quality sensor (Sony IMX766) and a more capable ultrawide lens suggest superior image quality.

Motorola Moto G24 Power Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: 6000mAh battery capacity could translate to significantly longer usage time between charges.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging will top up the battery quicker than the A54's 25W charging.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in the "low price" range, the G24 Power offers greater affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera capabilities. Suitable for gaming, content consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

Motorola Moto G24 Power: Users who prioritize long battery life and affordability above all else. Ideal for users with basic usage patterns and limited access to charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A54 is a "medium price" phone while the G24 Power is "low price".
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy users requiring performance and a good display should lean towards the A54. Light users prioritizing battery life might prefer the G24 Power.
  3. How important is display and camera quality to you? The A54 significantly outperforms the G24 Power in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A54

While the Motorola Moto G24 Power boasts a larger battery and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, performance, and camera system of the A54 are crucial factors for me. I prioritize a smooth and enjoyable user experience, vibrant visuals, and the ability to capture high-quality photos and videos. The A54's performance advantage ensures that the phone can handle demanding tasks and remain responsive over time. While battery life is important, the performance and feature gap between the two phones is substantial enough to justify the price difference for my needs. The faster charging on the G24 Power might save some minutes, but the overall superior experience on the A54 would be more valuable to me on a daily basis.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.