Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 30, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 100.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 202 g 190 g
Height 158.2 mm 162.6 mm
Width 76.7 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Caramel Latte
  • Scarlet Wave

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2162.6 x 74.8 x 8.3Moto G Stylus is slightly larger and may be less comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)202190Moto G Stylus is slightly lighter.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild materials impact durability and premium feel; information lacking for both.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, but AMOLED generally has slightly better outdoor visibility. P-OLED might be more power efficient in some scenarios.
Size (inches)6.46.7Moto G Stylus offers a larger screen for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2400Very similar pixel density; sharpness will be nearly identical on both.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)1200Moto G Stylus likely has better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 generally provides better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz A78 & 4x1.8 GHz A55)Exynos 1380 may offer slightly faster peak performance, but real-world difference could be minimal.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Adreno 710Adreno 710 generally offers stronger graphics performance for gaming.
RAM (GB)88Both offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage (GB)128/256256Moto G Stylus offers more base storage.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50 (Sony IMX766)50 (Sony LYT-700C)Both utilize 50MP sensors; image quality will depend on processing. IMX766 is generally regarded as a higher-end sensor.
Ultrawide (MP)1313Similar ultrawide capabilities.
Macro (MP)513 (shared with ultrawide)A54 has dedicated Macro lens, Moto G Stylus shares macro functionality with the ultrawide, potentially impacting macro image quality.
Selfie (MP)3232Similar selfie camera resolution.
Video4K@30fps with EIS4K@30fpsBoth can record 4K video; EIS performance is crucial for stability and needs further review.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)2530Moto G Stylus offers faster wired charging.
Wireless ChargingNoYes (15W)Moto G Stylus supports wireless charging, a significant convenience advantage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Potentially slightly better main camera sensor (IMX766).
  • Dedicated macro lens.
  • Potentially slightly faster peak CPU performance.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Advantages:

  • Larger display.
  • Higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
  • Generally better GPU performance.
  • More base storage.
  • Faster charging.
  • Wireless charging.
  • Stylus support for note-taking and drawing (not explicitly in specs but implied by name).
  • Newer Android version (14 vs 13).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users prioritizing a potentially slightly better main camera and a more compact size.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): Users who value a large screen, stylus support, faster charging, wireless charging, and better gaming performance. Good for productivity, media consumption, and mobile gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is stylus support? If crucial, the Moto G Stylus is the clear choice.
  2. What's your budget and storage needs? The Moto G Stylus offers more base storage but might be more expensive. Consider the price difference for the storage tier you need.
  3. Do you prioritize camera quality or other features like a larger display and wireless charging?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student needing note-taking: Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • Gamer on a budget: Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • User prioritizing camera and compactness: Samsung Galaxy A54

My Choice: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)

The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) offers a compelling combination of features for my needs. The larger display, stylus support (implied), wireless charging, faster wired charging, and strong performance outweigh the potential camera advantage of the A54. While the A54 might have a marginally better main camera sensor, the overall package of the Moto G Stylus, including the newer Android version, makes it a more future-proof and versatile device. The larger battery capacity and faster charging are also significant advantages for daily use. Finally, the price difference, considering the increased base storage in the Moto G Stylus, makes it a better value proposition in my opinion.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.