Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 202 g 171 g
Height 158.2 mm 154.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 19

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Motorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Edge 50 Neo is slightly smaller and more compact.
Weight (g)202171Edge 50 Neo is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDLTPO P-OLEDBoth offer excellent color and contrast, but P-OLED generally consumes less power, especially with variable refresh rates.
Display Size (inches)6.46.4Same screen size.
Resolution1080 x 23401256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo has a sharper display due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. Edge 50 Neo's LTPO panel allows for more granular refresh rate control for power saving.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)3000 (peak)Edge 50 Neo should be significantly brighter outdoors. A54's HBM indicates high brightness mode, but typical brightness is likely lower.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)Both are mid-range chipsets. Dimensity 7300, being newer and built on a smaller process, likely offers better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 50 Neo has a slightly faster CPU clock speed, potentially leading to quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G615 MC2Mali-G68 MP5 generally offers better graphics performance.
RAM8GB8/12GBEdge 50 Neo offers a 12GB RAM option, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Edge 50 Neo ships with a newer Android version and is likely to receive longer software updates.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar resolution, but sensor quality can differ (Sony IMX766 on A54 vs. Sony LYT-700C on Edge 50 Neo).
Ultrawide (MP)1313Similar resolution.
Other LensesMacroTelephoto & MacroEdge 50 Neo offers optical zoom with the telephoto lens, which is superior to digital zoom.
DxOMark Score107115Edge 50 Neo scores higher overall on DxOMark, suggesting better overall camera quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004310A54 has a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)2568Edge 50 Neo supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Potentially Better GPU: Smoother gaming experience.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: More detailed visuals.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduced charging times.
  • Newer OS and Longer Software Support: More up-to-date features and security updates.
  • Optical Zoom: Better quality zoomed photos compared to digital zoom.
  • Higher DxOMark Score: Suggests better overall camera performance.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Improved handling and portability.
  • More RAM Option: 12GB option for improved multitasking.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Users prioritizing longer battery life and potentially smoother gaming, who are less concerned about having the latest features or fastest charging.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Users who value a sharper display, faster charging, newer software, optical zoom for photography, a lighter phone, and the potential for smoother multitasking with the 12GB RAM option.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is battery life to you? If it's paramount, the A54's larger battery might be preferable.
  2. What is your budget and storage requirement? The Edge 50 Neo might be more expensive, especially the 12GB/512GB version.
  3. Do you prioritize camera quality and features like optical zoom? The Edge 50 Neo seems to have a clear advantage in this area.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

While the A54 offers a larger battery, the Edge 50 Neo's advantages in display sharpness, charging speed, camera quality (especially the optical zoom), lighter weight, and newer software outweigh that single benefit for me. The availability of a 12GB RAM option further enhances its appeal for future-proofing and smoother performance. The slightly higher price seems justified for the overall superior package offered by the Edge 50 Neo. The longer software support is also a crucial factor in ensuring a longer lifespan for the device.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.