Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 202 g 199 g
Height 158.2 mm 163.3 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Honor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2Honor 200 Pro is taller and slightly narrower. Negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)202199Virtually identical weight; no noticeable difference in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.78Honor 200 Pro offers a significantly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401224 x 2700Honor 200 Pro has a higher resolution, resulting in sharper text and images, especially noticeable on the larger display.
TypeSuper AMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Subjective preference will determine which display is better.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)4000Honor 200 Pro should be significantly more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a more powerful chipset, offering significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz X4 & 4x2.8 GHz A720 & 3x2.0 GHz A520)Honor 200 Pro has a more modern and powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster processing speeds.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Adreno 735Adreno 735 offers superior graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM (GB)812More RAM in the Honor allows for smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar megapixel count, but sensor and lens specifications will determine actual image quality. Honor has a larger sensor (1/1.3" vs 1/1.56") potentially capturing more light.
Ultrawide (MP)1312Negligible difference in megapixels. Practical image quality depends on sensor and lens quality which can't be fully determined from the provided data.
TelephotoNo50MP with 2.5x Optical ZoomHonor 200 Pro offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, providing clearer zoomed-in shots compared to digital zoom.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005200Honor 200 Pro has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering slightly longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)25100Honor 200 Pro supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, coupled with more RAM, provides a noticeable performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Larger and sharper display: The 6.78-inch OLED display with a higher resolution offers a more immersive viewing experience. Higher peak brightness drastically improves outdoor visibility.
  • Faster Charging: 100W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Dedicated Telephoto Lens: Enables optical zoom for superior image quality when zoomed in.

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While exact pricing isn't available, the A54 generally falls into a more affordable price bracket.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Honor 200 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance, a large, high-quality display, and fast charging.

Samsung Galaxy A54: Suitable for users seeking a balance of features and affordability, prioritizing everyday tasks, social media, and casual photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Honor 200 Pro is likely more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the Honor, while everyday use might suffice with the A54.
  3. How important is screen size and quality? The Honor 200 Pro offers a larger, sharper display with better outdoor visibility.

My Choice: Honor 200 Pro

While likely more expensive, the Honor 200 Pro offers a significant upgrade in performance, display quality, and charging speed. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, coupled with 12GB RAM, ensures smooth performance for years to come. The larger, brighter, higher-resolution display provides a more immersive experience. The 100W fast charging is a major convenience. Finally, the dedicated telephoto lens enhances photographic versatility. While the A54 is a solid mid-range option, the Honor 200 Pro's advantages in key areas justify the likely price difference for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.