Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 September 9, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 202 g 199 g
Height 158.2 mm 152.8 mm
Width 76.7 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Porcelain
  • Rose Quartz

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1280 x 2856
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 86.9 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 495 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Google Pixel 9 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2152.8 x 72.0 x 8.5Pixel 9 Pro is slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker. A54 might feel slightly less bulky overall.
Weight (g)202199Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDLTPO OLEDBoth offer excellent color and contrast. Pixel's LTPO allows for more granular refresh rate control, potentially saving battery.
Display Size (inches)6.46.3Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 23401280 x 2856Pixel 9 Pro has a sharper display due to higher pixel density. Noticeable in fine details and text clarity.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)3000 (peak)Pixel 9 Pro significantly brighter, crucial for outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)Tensor G4 likely offers superior performance and AI capabilities, though real-world differences in common tasks may vary.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz X4 & 3x2.6 GHz A720 & 4x1.92 GHz A520)Pixel 9 Pro's more modern CPU architecture should provide faster processing, especially in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G715 MC7Pixel 9 Pro likely has a more powerful GPU, benefiting gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM8 GB16 GBPixel 9 Pro's double the RAM allows for significantly more apps to run in the background without reloading, improving multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution, but sensor size and processing make a larger difference in image quality. Pixel is known for exceptional computational photography.
Ultrawide (MP)1348Pixel has a significantly higher resolution ultrawide, capturing more detail. It also doubles as a macro lens.
Telephoto (MP)N/A48Pixel offers optical zoom capabilities, absent in the A54.
Video Recording4K@30fps8K@30fpsPixel can record in higher resolution, but 4K is sufficient for most users. Pixel also boasts superior video stabilization and HDR capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004700A54 has slightly larger battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends heavily on usage and software optimization.
Fast Charging (W)2527Similar fast charging speeds; negligible difference in practice.
Wireless ChargingNoYes (21W)Pixel offers convenient wireless charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the mid-range segment, offering good value.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Slightly larger battery.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: More powerful processor, GPU, and double the RAM.
  • Significantly Better Camera System: Higher resolution ultrawide and telephoto lenses, advanced computational photography, 8K video recording.
  • Brighter, Sharper Display: Higher resolution and peak brightness.
  • More Feature-Rich Software: Pixel's exclusive Android features and guaranteed updates.
  • Wireless Charging: Added convenience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality, long battery life, and a good display. Ideal for web browsing, social media, casual photography, and light gaming.

Google Pixel 9 Pro: Ideal for power users, photographers, and videographers. Excellent for demanding tasks, gaming, capturing high-quality photos and videos, and enjoying the latest Android features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 9 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? (e.g., photography, gaming, social media)
  3. How important are features like wireless charging, the latest software updates, and top-tier performance?

My Choice: Google Pixel 9 Pro

While the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers excellent value, the Pixel 9 Pro's superior camera system, performance, display, and software make it the compelling choice for me. I prioritize having the best possible camera and a smooth, responsive user experience. The extra cost is justified by the significant improvements in key areas. The future-proofing provided by longer software updates and the powerful Tensor G4 chip also contribute to its long-term value. Although the A54 might offer slightly longer battery life, the Pixel's wireless charging adds convenience that outweighs this minor difference for my usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.