Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Google Pixel 9 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 August 22, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 202 g 198 g
Height 158.2 mm 152.8 mm
Width 76.7 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Wintergreen
  • Peony

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2424
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 422 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Google Pixel 9Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2152.8 x 72.0 x 8.5Pixel 9 is slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker. A54 might feel slightly less bulky overall.
Weight (g)202198Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedMaterial differences could impact durability and premium feel; information lacking.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors. Subjective preference for color accuracy and saturation may apply.
Display Size (inches)6.46.3Negligible size difference; A54 slightly larger.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2424Similar sharpness; Pixel 9 slightly higher pixel density due to smaller screen.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)1800 (HBM), 2700 (peak)Pixel 9 significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility and HDR content.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)Tensor G4 likely offers significantly better performance and AI processing.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz X4 & 3x2.6 GHz A720 & 4x1.92 GHz A520)Pixel 9's more modern CPU architecture should result in noticeably faster speeds and better multi-tasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G715 MC7Pixel 9's GPU should deliver superior gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8GB12GBPixel 9's larger RAM enables better multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Resolution similar, but sensor details (size, pixel size) indicate Pixel 9 likely captures more light and detail.
Ultrawide (MP)1348Pixel 9's ultrawide offers much higher resolution and potentially wider field of view. Also functions as Macro lens.
Selfie Camera (MP)3210.5A54 has higher selfie resolution; however, image quality depends on sensor and processing, not just megapixels. Pixel's computational photography could outperform despite lower resolution.
DXOMark Score107154Pixel 9 significantly outperforms A54 in overall camera quality according to DXOMark.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004700A54 has slightly larger battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)2527Minor difference in charging speed.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Pixel 9 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Tensor G4, more RAM, and superior GPU offer a smoother, faster experience.
  • Superior camera system: Higher DXOMark score, larger main sensor, higher resolution ultrawide, and Google's advanced image processing.
  • Brighter display: Improves outdoor visibility and HDR experience.
  • Longer software support: Expected updates up to Android 21.

A54 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: Larger battery capacity might translate to longer usage time, though real-world usage varies greatly.
  • Potentially lower price: Based on the "medium price" range and historical pricing, the A54 is likely more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Pixel 9: Users who prioritize performance, camera quality, a vibrant display, and the latest software features. Ideal for demanding tasks, gaming, mobile photography, and content consumption.

A54: Users seeking a balance of features and affordability. Suitable for everyday tasks, social media, casual photography, and users who prioritize battery life. Good option for budget-conscious buyers.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 9 is likely more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Gaming, photography, demanding apps benefit from Pixel 9's performance.
  3. How important is software support and future updates? Pixel 9 offers longer update commitment.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget: A54
  • Photography enthusiast: Pixel 9
  • Mobile gamer: Pixel 9
  • Value seeker: A54

My Choice: Google Pixel 9

While the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a solid set of features for a potentially lower price, the Google Pixel 9's significant advantages in performance, camera quality, display brightness, and software support make it the compelling choice for me. I prioritize a smooth user experience, excellent photography capabilities, and the assurance of long-term software updates. The slightly higher price is a worthwhile trade-off for these substantial benefits. The Tensor G4's AI capabilities are also a compelling feature, potentially offering unique and useful features. While battery life is a concern, modern power management features and fast charging mitigate this somewhat.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.