Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs vivo X100 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2022 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 96.7 cm³ 109.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.07 "/g
Weight 189 g 221 g
Height 159.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.8 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 117.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.71 mAh/cm³ 49.1 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Mali-G68 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16 15

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs. vivo X100 Pro: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's delve into the user experience each device offers.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A53 5Gvivo X100 ProUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 4.1 (Android 12)OriginOS 3 (Android 14)vivo offers a potentially newer, more feature-rich Android experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigation, 120Hz refresh ratePotentially customized navigation, 120Hz refresh rateBoth offer smooth scrolling, but vivo's customizations could enhance or complicate the experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsPotentially expanded features with OriginOS 3vivo might offer more accessibility customization.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic back, lighter (189g)Glass back, heavier (221g)A53 5G might feel more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah.

  • A53 5G: Sarah appreciates the A53 5G's reliable 64MP main camera for everyday shots and its user-friendly interface. The 120Hz display makes scrolling through her photo gallery smooth. However, low-light photography might be challenging.
  • X100 Pro: Sarah is captivated by the X100 Pro's advanced camera system with a larger sensor and Zeiss optics, promising stunning low-light performance and creative control. The higher resolution and brighter display bring her photos to life. She might find the price point a barrier.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Budget-conscious user: The A53 5G offers excellent value for its price, providing a solid user experience without breaking the bank.
  • Power user: The X100 Pro caters to demanding users who prioritize cutting-edge technology, particularly in photography and display quality.
  • Senior user: Both phones offer large displays with adjustable font sizes, but the A53 5G's lighter weight might be preferable for extended use.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

  • Prioritize Affordability and Ease of Use: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G.
  • Prioritize Cutting-Edge Camera Technology and Display Quality: Choose the vivo X100 Pro.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the vivo X100 Pro.

Why? While the A53 5G is a commendable device, the X100 Pro resonates with my appreciation for design innovation and advanced technology. Its superior camera system, powered by Zeiss optics and a larger sensor, speaks to the potential for capturing truly breathtaking images. The brighter, higher-resolution display enhances the visual experience, aligning with my emphasis on user immersion. Although the higher price point is a consideration, the X100 Pro's significant advancements in key areas crucial to user experience, like photography and display, make it the more compelling choice for me. The leap in camera technology and screen quality justifies the price difference for a user who values these features. It embodies a design philosophy that prioritizes pushing technological boundaries to deliver a richer, more engaging user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.