Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 1, 2021 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 108.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 189 g 200 g
Height 159.9 mm 163.6 mm
Width 75.1 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Purple
  • Awesome Mint
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 650 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 116.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 46.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5080 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's break down these two contenders, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT, and see where each one shines. I've got my tech hat on, so we'll go deep but keep it relatable.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GXiaomi Poco X4 GTReal-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2021-09-012022-06-27Poco X4 GT is newer by about 9 months
Dimensions159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mmPoco is taller and slightly thicker; A52s might be more pocketable.
Weight189g200gA52s is slightly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Virtually the same screen size.
Resolution1080x24001080x2460Both offer sharp, crisp visuals.
Pixel Density405 PPI407 PPIIdentical sharpness in practice.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDA52s has the superior AMOLED, with vibrant colors, deep blacks and better power efficiency for dark themes. Poco's LCD may be a bit less vibrant.
Refresh Rate120Hz144HzPoco has slightly smoother animations and scrolling; subtle difference.
Brightness800 nits0 nitsA52s is significantly brighter, more usable in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G 5GDimensity 8100Dimensity 8100 is much more powerful, leading to faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
Antutu Score570,752820,061Poco will handle gaming and intensive tasks significantly better.
GPUAdreno 642LMali-G610 MC6Poco's GPU provides a better gaming experience
Battery Life
Capacity4500mAh5080mAhPoco has a larger battery, meaning potentially longer usage time.
Charging25W fast charging67W fast chargingPoco charges much faster, a huge convenience.
Battery TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerBoth are non-removable
Camera
Main Camera64MP f/1.864MP f/1.89A52s has slightly wider aperture & a bit larger sensor. Both should be capable of good images.
Selfie Camera32MP f/2.016MP f/2.45A52s has a higher resolution front camera and wider aperture.
Wide Angle12MP f/2.28MP f/2.2A52s captures higher resolution ultra-wide shots.
Depth (Portrait)5MP f/2.4Not AvailableA52s offers depth sensing for portrait mode; better background blur effects.
Macro Camera5MP f/2.42MP f/2.4A52s will capture higher-resolution macro shots.
Video4K@30fps, EIS4K@30fpsA52s includes electronic image stabilization (EIS) across all resolutions, Poco doesn't.
Slow-Motion120fps960fpsPoco records slow-motion at a much higher rate
Software
Operating SystemAndroid 11 (up to 14)Android 12Poco has a slightly more recent operating system. Samsung guaranteed 3 OS upgrades.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6, MIMOBoth with latest standards; Xiaomi supports MIMO
Bluetooth5.05.3 LEPoco has a newer, more efficient version
GPSGPS, etc.A-GPS, etc.Poco has more advanced and accurate GPS
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth support dual SIMs
Storage
Internal Storage128/256 GB128/256 GBSame internal storage options for both models.
RAM6/8 GB8 GBPoco has consistent RAM capacity.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports external storage expansion.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby AtmosDolby Atmos, Hi-Res AudioPoco X4GT has more advanced audio features
Security
FingerprintBasic fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprint sensorPoco X4GT has a more convenient side-mounted sensor
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 5Both phones have a similar level of screen scratch resistance.
Sensors
SensorsComprehensiveComprehensiveA52s includes Hall and Geomagnetic, while X4 GT offers RGB. Similar capabilities

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: This phone is all about a balanced, polished experience. The AMOLED display is a clear win, offering superior visuals with vibrant colors and deep blacks that are hard to ignore. The camera setup is also more versatile with a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode and a better selfie shooter and wider camera angles. While it's not a performance monster, the Snapdragon 778G is still very capable for most everyday tasks. The build is solid and the 3 OS upgrades are a big plus. However, the charging is slower, and it's not as powerful for intensive tasks or gaming as the Poco.
  • Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: This phone is a performance powerhouse. The Dimensity 8100 chipset provides a substantial boost in speed, making it excellent for gaming and heavy multitasking. The higher refresh rate screen (144Hz) is smoother, although it’s an IPS LCD panel rather than AMOLED, meaning colours are less vibrant and blacks aren't as deep. The 67W charging is also a huge advantage. However, its camera performance is less versatile (no depth sensor, inferior selfie camera and wide lens) and the display might not be as rich as the A52s. It comes with a more recent operating system.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is ideal for:
    • Users who prioritize a high-quality display with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
    • Users who want a versatile camera system for everyday photography.
    • Those who prefer a balanced smartphone experience with good performance for daily tasks.
    • Users who value software and OS support (3 major Android upgrades)
  • Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is ideal for:
    • Gamers and power users who need top-tier performance and smooth graphics.
    • Users who value super-fast charging and need a device that can be quickly topped up.
    • Those who are happy to trade some screen quality for raw processing power and higher refresh rate.
    • Users who don't need the most versatile camera setups.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to ask yourself:

  1. How important is display quality to you? If a vibrant, high-contrast AMOLED is a must, the A52s is your pick. If raw performance matters more than display tech, the Poco will be a better fit.
  2. How much do you game or multitask? For casual use, the A52s is sufficient. But if you need a phone that can handle heavy gaming and intense multitasking, the Poco's stronger processor is the clear winner.
  3. Is fast charging a must-have? If waiting for your phone to charge is a pain, the Poco's super-fast charging will be a lifesaver, while the A52s is painfully slow.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Casual User: If you just need a reliable phone for everyday tasks, the Samsung A52s 5G is a great all-rounder and will deliver a polished experience, especially with the high-quality display and capable cameras.
  • The Gamer: If gaming is your priority, the Poco X4 GT's powerful processor, fast refresh rate, and quick charging are definitely worth it, even with the less appealing screen.
  • The Photographer: The Samsung's better all-round camera setup and image quality, makes it a better option for photography than the Poco X4 GT.

My Choice:

If I were choosing between these two, I'd pick the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT. While I appreciate the superior display of the Samsung, the raw performance advantage of the Poco, coupled with the incredibly fast charging, fits my needs as someone who juggles multiple apps and loves mobile gaming. I also value a smooth experience, which the Poco's 144Hz display and high processing power can provide. Plus, the side-mounted fingerprint sensor is more convenient, and the newer Bluetooth version is always a welcome addition. The trade-off in display vibrancy is something I'm willing to live with, especially since my main concern is performance and battery.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.