Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and the Motorola Moto G72. I'm putting on my tech journalist hat and breaking down these devices not just by their specs, but by how those specs actually translate into your daily life.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed look at how these two phones stack up, focusing on practical implications for users:
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | Motorola Moto G72 | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 160.5 × 74.4 × 7.9 mm | A52s is slightly thicker but similar in overall size. G72 is lighter and may feel more comfortable for longer use. |
Weight | 189g | 166g | G72 is noticeably lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use. |
Build | Glass front, plastic frame & back | Plastic frame & back | A52s has glass front for more durability on the screen, but both are plastic frames and back. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Both have very similar large displays for immersive viewing. 0.1" difference is negligible. |
Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2400 | Both offer sharp, detailed visuals. |
PPI | 405 | 402 | Both offer similar pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness in real-world use. |
Technology | AMOLED | P-OLED | Similar technologies; both offer vibrant colors and good contrast. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both have smooth 120Hz displays, great for scrolling and gaming. |
Brightness | 800 nits | 0 nits (likely an error) | A52s has significantly better outdoor visibility, if the Moto G72 has a low brightness, it may be difficult to see outdoors. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | A52s with Snapdragon has better performance for demanding tasks, gaming and app loading. |
AnTuTu Score | 570,752 | 415,300 | A52s offers a noticeable performance boost in overall benchmarks. |
GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 MC2 | A52s GPU is more powerful, especially for gaming and graphic-intensive apps. |
Camera | |||
Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm | 108MP, f/1.7, 0.64µm | G72 has a higher megapixel count for more detail, but A52s has a larger sensor size and pixel size. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.0 | 16MP | A52s has a higher megapixel front-facing camera for more detailed selfies. |
Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/1.9, 1.12µm | A52s offers slightly more resolution in its wide-angle lens. G72 has a wider aperture and slightly larger pixel size. |
Depth Sensor | 5MP, f/2.4 | N/A | A52s has dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos, allowing better background blur effects. |
Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm | A52s has a higher megapixel macro lens for detailed close up shots. G72 has a larger pixel size, allowing more light. |
Video Recording | 4K@30fps with EIS | 1080p@60fps | A52s offers higher resolution video recording; both have EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) for stabilization. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | G72 has a larger battery, likely giving it better battery life between charges. |
Charging | 25W fast charging | 33W fast charging | G72 offers faster charging, allowing quicker top-ups. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 12 | G72 comes with a slightly newer OS out of the box; A52s can be upgraded to Android 14. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | A52s supports a newer, faster Wi-Fi standard for better network performance. |
2. Key Insights
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G:
- Strengths: The A52s boasts a stronger processor (Snapdragon 778G 5G), higher AnTuTu benchmark scores, and a more capable GPU. This translates to a more fluid, powerful performance in demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking. It also has the better display in brightness, which is useful for outdoors usage, more camera versatility, and it is more future proof in terms of software upgrades.
- Competitive Advantages: Its AMOLED display has a higher maximum brightness, making it better for outdoor visibility. It offers 4K video recording and better image stabilization, making it suitable for capturing high quality videos.
- Trade-offs: A smaller battery and slightly slower charging than the G72.
Motorola Moto G72:
- Strengths: The G72 has a larger battery and faster charging, offering better battery endurance. Its higher-resolution main camera captures slightly more detail. It also includes Stereo Speakers.
- Competitive Advantages: It's lighter and has a thinner profile, which some users might prefer for ergonomics.
- Trade-offs: The Mediatek Helio G99 chip is less powerful compared to the Snapdragon in the A52s. The display, according to the data, may have outdoor visibility issues, the camera system isn't as versatile as the one in A52s, it has worse video recording capabilities, and it has a slower Wi-Fi standard.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
- Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, camera versatility, and higher quality video recording. Gamers, frequent content creators, and anyone who values a smoother, faster phone will find it ideal. Also good for those who prioritize brighter displays.
- Motorola Moto G72: A good fit for users who need maximum battery life and appreciate a lighter device. It's suitable for those who mostly do basic tasks, enjoy media, and need a reliable phone for everyday use.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three practical questions to help you decide:
Do you need peak performance for gaming or resource-intensive apps?
- Yes: Go for the Galaxy A52s 5G.
- No: The Moto G72 may suffice.
Is battery life and fast charging a priority?
- Yes: The Moto G72 is a better choice.
- No: The Galaxy A52s 5G is a solid alternative.
Do you often use your phone in bright sunlight or prioritize quality video recording?
- Yes: The Galaxy A52s 5G will be your best bet with its brighter display and 4K recording.
- No: The Moto G72 may be satisfactory.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two, I would lean towards the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. Here's why:
- Performance Matters: As someone who tends to multitask, I appreciate the smoothness and responsiveness of the Snapdragon 778G chipset.
- Camera Versatility: I value having a capable camera system with a wide variety of modes and the ability to shoot in 4K. The optical image stabilization is also important to me, allowing me to capture good photos and videos without worrying about shaky hands.
- Better Display: Although both displays have 120Hz refresh rate, the A52s has a higher brightness that gives more visibility on outdoor use, something I highly value.
- Future-Proofing: With the ability to upgrade to Android 14, I know that the A52s will remain up-to-date for a bit longer.
While the Moto G72's larger battery and faster charging are appealing, I value the overall balance of performance, display quality, and camera versatility that the A52s offers. It aligns better with how I use my phone.