Samsung Galaxy A52 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 189 g 189 g
Height 159.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mmA52 is slightly shorter and thinner; A75 4G is taller and slightly thicker. Overall, both have similar dimensions and ergonomics.
Weight189g189gBoth phones have the same weight, likely resulting in a similar in-hand feel.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Minimal difference in screen size; both provide a large display for media and general use.
Resolution1080x2400720x1612A52 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. The difference will be noticeable for reading and detailed viewing.
PPI407267A52's higher pixel density translates to a more detailed and crisp display.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDA52's AMOLED screen offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, leading to a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness at 0 nits; Likely refers to peak brightness in ideal lab conditions. We need real-world nits for comparison.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)A52's Snapdragon 720G is more powerful, offering faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better overall performance.
AnTuTu Score341,212240,000A52 is significantly faster based on benchmarks, performing better in gaming and demanding apps.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G57 MP1A52's GPU is better for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, delivering smoother frame rates.
Camera
Rear Main Camera64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" Sony IMX68250MP, f/1.8A52 has a higher resolution sensor with larger sensor size, likely resulting in better image quality in varied lighting conditions.
Front Camera32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" Sony IMX6168MPA52's front camera will produce significantly more detailed selfies and better video quality.
Wide Angle Lens12MP, f/2.2Not AvailableA52 offers a wider field of view for landscape and group photos.
Depth Lens5MP, f/2.4Not AvailableA52 has a dedicated depth sensor, resulting in better portrait photos with blurred backgrounds.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.4Not AvailableA52 has a dedicated Macro lens for close-up photography.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, EIS, Slow-motion 120fps1080p@30fps; No Slow-motion, 30fpsA52 captures higher-quality video (4K), smoother footage, and slow-motion for more creative options.
Features4K, OIS, Digital/Optical Zoom, Night ModeDigital Zoom, PDAFA52 offers more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper images and videos, along with a dedicated Night Mode.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhA75 4G has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life, especially for heavy users.
Charging25W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingA52 charges slightly faster, reducing downtime.
Battery FeaturesQC2.0 and AFCNone specificA52 supports Quick Charge 2.0 and Adaptive Fast Charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 14Android 13A75 4G ships with a newer version of Android but the A52 is upgradable to 14; Software updates may not be prioritized for the A75 4G.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band, Direct, Hotspot802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band, Direct, HotspotBoth offer similar Wi-Fi capabilities.
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+5.0, A2DP, LEA52 has more features like EDR (Enhanced Data Rate) and ANT+, catering to specific use cases, like connecting more advanced Bluetooth devices.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoBoth provide the same GPS capabilities.
SIMDual Nano-SIM, Dual StandbyDual Nano-SIM, Dual StandbyBoth offer dual SIM capability.
Storage
Internal Storage128GB/256GB128GB/256GBBoth offer similar storage options.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB4GB/8GBBoth offer similar RAM, impacting multitasking, but the A52 has slightly more flexibility.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo SpeakersDTS / DTS XA52's audio features provide a more immersive and richer audio experience, while the A75 4G has a standard sound experience.
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint SensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorA75 4G's side-mounted fingerprint sensor might be more convenient for some users.
Build
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownA52 offers better protection against scratches and cracks.
Sensors
FeaturesFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, GeomagneticFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeA52 has more sensor options, which are better for use in advanced features and gaming.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution and pixel density provides a sharper, more vibrant, and immersive viewing experience, particularly noticeable when watching videos and reading.
  • Enhanced Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset offers significantly better performance than the Unisoc T606, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras, along with additional lenses (wide-angle, macro, depth), and features such as OIS, lead to better photos and video in more varied situations.
  • Advanced Audio: Features such as Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers provides a more immersive audio experience, enhancing music and video.
  • More Sensors: More sensor options which are better for use in advanced features and gaming.
  • Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass 5 provides more protection from damage.
  • Software Updates: Android 11, upgradable to 14.

Practical Implications: The A52 is better for users who prioritize visual experience, mobile gaming, and photography/videography.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery offers better battery life, which is beneficial for users who are often away from power outlets or who consume media heavily.
  • Newer Android version: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, though software update support after this is questionable.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: May be more convenient to use for some users.
  • Potentially lower cost: It's expected to be cheaper than the A52, making it an attractive budget option.

Practical Implications: The A75 4G is ideal for those who need long battery life and are on a tight budget.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • A52: You get a better screen, more performance, and a more versatile camera, but with less battery capacity.
  • A75 4G: You get longer battery life at the expense of a lower resolution screen, weaker performance, and a less capable camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52:

  • Ideal User: Users who consume a lot of media (videos, social media), play mobile games, and take frequent pictures.
  • Use Cases:
    • Streaming high-quality video content.
    • Playing visually intensive mobile games.
    • Capturing high-quality photos and videos.
    • Heavy social media usage.
  • Price-to-Value: Good value for a mid-range phone if the screen, performance, and camera are important.

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize long battery life, require a basic smartphone experience, and are on a strict budget.
  • Use Cases:
    • Basic tasks like calling, texting, and web browsing.
    • Extended use without frequent charging.
    • Casual social media browsing.
  • Price-to-Value: High value for an entry-level phone due to its long battery life.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display quality? (Do you need a sharp, vibrant screen?)
  2. What is your primary use case? (Gaming, photography, or basic usage?)
  3. How important is battery life? (Do you need all-day power, or can you charge regularly?)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: If you prioritize media consumption and mobile gaming, and have a reasonable budget, choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its superior display and performance.
  • Scenario 2: If you are on a strict budget and need all-day battery life for basic tasks, the ZTE Blade A75 4G will meet your needs.
  • Scenario 3: If you want the best camera and media experience possible and are willing to charge more often, choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.

What I would choose and why

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. Here's why:

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G has a larger battery, which is appealing, the Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a far more compelling user experience in almost every other aspect that is important to me.

Here's a detailed breakdown:

  • Display: The AMOLED display with its significantly higher resolution and pixel density is a major draw. I value crisp, vibrant visuals for browsing, videos, and general use, and this is where the A52 excels. The difference between the two screens will be substantial.

  • Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset provides noticeably better performance than the Unisoc T606. I would rather have a faster phone for general multitasking and any occasional gaming needs. The benchmark numbers reflect the performance boost that the A52 provides.

  • Camera: The A52 offers a far superior camera system. It has additional lenses, a better main sensor, and most importantly, OIS (Optical Image Stabilization). This would be extremely valuable, especially for capturing everyday moments. The A75 4G's camera is very basic.

  • Software: While the A75 4G comes with a newer version of Android out of the box, the A52 is upgradable to Android 14, which makes up for it. Samsung tends to offer better software support than less known brands like ZTE.

  • Audio: The audio experience with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos is a huge plus for the A52.

  • Build Quality and Sensors: The Gorilla Glass protection for the screen and more advanced sensors in the A52 make it a more premium feeling phone.

While the 500mAh larger battery in the A75 4G is enticing, I am comfortable with the A52's charging speed and am usually near charging options. The superior screen, performance, camera, audio, software, and better overall experience outweigh the slight disadvantage in battery life. The A52 is a more premium smartphone experience, while the A75 4G feels like a budget phone.

Therefore, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is my choice for the better overall value, despite the slightly lower battery capacity.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.