Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G
1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mm | A52 is slightly shorter and thinner; A75 4G is taller and slightly thicker. Overall, both have similar dimensions and ergonomics. |
Weight | 189g | 189g | Both phones have the same weight, likely resulting in a similar in-hand feel. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Minimal difference in screen size; both provide a large display for media and general use. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | A52 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. The difference will be noticeable for reading and detailed viewing. |
PPI | 407 | 267 | A52's higher pixel density translates to a more detailed and crisp display. |
Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A52's AMOLED screen offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, leading to a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both provide smooth scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both have identical peak brightness at 0 nits; Likely refers to peak brightness in ideal lab conditions. We need real-world nits for comparison. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | A52's Snapdragon 720G is more powerful, offering faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better overall performance. |
AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 240,000 | A52 is significantly faster based on benchmarks, performing better in gaming and demanding apps. |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MP1 | A52's GPU is better for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, delivering smoother frame rates. |
Camera | |||
Rear Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" Sony IMX682 | 50MP, f/1.8 | A52 has a higher resolution sensor with larger sensor size, likely resulting in better image quality in varied lighting conditions. |
Front Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" Sony IMX616 | 8MP | A52's front camera will produce significantly more detailed selfies and better video quality. |
Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | Not Available | A52 offers a wider field of view for landscape and group photos. |
Depth Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | A52 has a dedicated depth sensor, resulting in better portrait photos with blurred backgrounds. |
Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | A52 has a dedicated Macro lens for close-up photography. |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, EIS, Slow-motion 120fps | 1080p@30fps; No Slow-motion, 30fps | A52 captures higher-quality video (4K), smoother footage, and slow-motion for more creative options. |
Features | 4K, OIS, Digital/Optical Zoom, Night Mode | Digital Zoom, PDAF | A52 offers more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper images and videos, along with a dedicated Night Mode. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | A75 4G has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life, especially for heavy users. |
Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 22.5W Fast Charging | A52 charges slightly faster, reducing downtime. |
Battery Features | QC2.0 and AFC | None specific | A52 supports Quick Charge 2.0 and Adaptive Fast Charging. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11, upgradable to 14 | Android 13 | A75 4G ships with a newer version of Android but the A52 is upgradable to 14; Software updates may not be prioritized for the A75 4G. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band, Direct, Hotspot | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band, Direct, Hotspot | Both offer similar Wi-Fi capabilities. |
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+ | 5.0, A2DP, LE | A52 has more features like EDR (Enhanced Data Rate) and ANT+, catering to specific use cases, like connecting more advanced Bluetooth devices. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Both provide the same GPS capabilities. |
SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Both offer dual SIM capability. |
Storage | |||
Internal Storage | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both offer similar storage options. |
RAM | 4GB/6GB/8GB | 4GB/8GB | Both offer similar RAM, impacting multitasking, but the A52 has slightly more flexibility. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage. |
Audio | |||
Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | DTS / DTS X | A52's audio features provide a more immersive and richer audio experience, while the A75 4G has a standard sound experience. |
Security | |||
Features | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | A75 4G's side-mounted fingerprint sensor might be more convenient for some users. |
Build | |||
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | A52 offers better protection against scratches and cracks. |
Sensors | |||
Features | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | A52 has more sensor options, which are better for use in advanced features and gaming. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution and pixel density provides a sharper, more vibrant, and immersive viewing experience, particularly noticeable when watching videos and reading.
- Enhanced Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset offers significantly better performance than the Unisoc T606, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras, along with additional lenses (wide-angle, macro, depth), and features such as OIS, lead to better photos and video in more varied situations.
- Advanced Audio: Features such as Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers provides a more immersive audio experience, enhancing music and video.
- More Sensors: More sensor options which are better for use in advanced features and gaming.
- Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass 5 provides more protection from damage.
- Software Updates: Android 11, upgradable to 14.
Practical Implications: The A52 is better for users who prioritize visual experience, mobile gaming, and photography/videography.
ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:
- Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery offers better battery life, which is beneficial for users who are often away from power outlets or who consume media heavily.
- Newer Android version: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, though software update support after this is questionable.
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: May be more convenient to use for some users.
- Potentially lower cost: It's expected to be cheaper than the A52, making it an attractive budget option.
Practical Implications: The A75 4G is ideal for those who need long battery life and are on a tight budget.
Significant Trade-offs:
- A52: You get a better screen, more performance, and a more versatile camera, but with less battery capacity.
- A75 4G: You get longer battery life at the expense of a lower resolution screen, weaker performance, and a less capable camera.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Users who consume a lot of media (videos, social media), play mobile games, and take frequent pictures.
- Use Cases:
- Streaming high-quality video content.
- Playing visually intensive mobile games.
- Capturing high-quality photos and videos.
- Heavy social media usage.
- Price-to-Value: Good value for a mid-range phone if the screen, performance, and camera are important.
ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize long battery life, require a basic smartphone experience, and are on a strict budget.
- Use Cases:
- Basic tasks like calling, texting, and web browsing.
- Extended use without frequent charging.
- Casual social media browsing.
- Price-to-Value: High value for an entry-level phone due to its long battery life.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality? (Do you need a sharp, vibrant screen?)
- What is your primary use case? (Gaming, photography, or basic usage?)
- How important is battery life? (Do you need all-day power, or can you charge regularly?)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: If you prioritize media consumption and mobile gaming, and have a reasonable budget, choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its superior display and performance.
- Scenario 2: If you are on a strict budget and need all-day battery life for basic tasks, the ZTE Blade A75 4G will meet your needs.
- Scenario 3: If you want the best camera and media experience possible and are willing to charge more often, choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.
What I would choose and why
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. Here's why:
While the ZTE Blade A75 4G has a larger battery, which is appealing, the Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a far more compelling user experience in almost every other aspect that is important to me.
Here's a detailed breakdown:
Display: The AMOLED display with its significantly higher resolution and pixel density is a major draw. I value crisp, vibrant visuals for browsing, videos, and general use, and this is where the A52 excels. The difference between the two screens will be substantial.
Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset provides noticeably better performance than the Unisoc T606. I would rather have a faster phone for general multitasking and any occasional gaming needs. The benchmark numbers reflect the performance boost that the A52 provides.
Camera: The A52 offers a far superior camera system. It has additional lenses, a better main sensor, and most importantly, OIS (Optical Image Stabilization). This would be extremely valuable, especially for capturing everyday moments. The A75 4G's camera is very basic.
Software: While the A75 4G comes with a newer version of Android out of the box, the A52 is upgradable to Android 14, which makes up for it. Samsung tends to offer better software support than less known brands like ZTE.
Audio: The audio experience with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos is a huge plus for the A52.
Build Quality and Sensors: The Gorilla Glass protection for the screen and more advanced sensors in the A52 make it a more premium feeling phone.
While the 500mAh larger battery in the A75 4G is enticing, I am comfortable with the A52's charging speed and am usually near charging options. The superior screen, performance, camera, audio, software, and better overall experience outweigh the slight disadvantage in battery life. The A52 is a more premium smartphone experience, while the A75 4G feels like a budget phone.
Therefore, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is my choice for the better overall value, despite the slightly lower battery capacity.