Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm | Redmi Note 11 Pro is taller and slightly thinner; A52 may feel more compact; 13g weight difference is subtle in hand. |
| Weight | 189g | 202g | A52 is slightly lighter, less fatigue for extended use |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.67" | Redmi Note 11 Pro has a marginally larger screen, which can provide a more immersive experience for media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both offer sharp visuals, no significant difference in clarity. |
| PPI | 407 | 395 | Very similar pixel density, both displays appear sharp. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, good for media consumption. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Redmi Note 11 Pro has smoother scrolling and animations, feels more responsive. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1200 nits | Redmi Note 11 Pro offers dramatically better outdoor visibility, much better for use under bright sunlight; Samsung A52 brightness is unknown; |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Helio G96 (12 nm) | Redmi Note 11 Pro benchmarks higher, may handle heavy tasks and gaming better; A52 uses an older chipset. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 405,259 | Redmi Note 11 Pro has better performance for gaming, demanding apps. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Different GPU configurations; Redmi Note 11 Pro is marginally better for graphically intensive tasks. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Redmi Note 11 Pro offers longer battery life, could last longer on a single charge. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 67W Fast Charging | Redmi Note 11 Pro charges significantly faster, less downtime to charge; A52 has slower charging. |
| Features | QC2.0, AFC | Non-removable | A52 has more specific fast charge technologies. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", IMX682 | 108MP, f/1.9, 1/1.52", HM2 | Redmi Note 11 Pro takes higher resolution photos; A52 has a slightly wider aperture (better low light). |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", IMX616 | 16MP, f/2.4, 1/3.06", OV16A1Q | A52 has a higher resolution, wider aperture and larger sensor selfie camera, better in low light; |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", IMX355 | A52 takes higher-resolution wide photos |
| Portrait Mode | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A52 includes a dedicated portrait mode camera; Redmi Note 11 Pro does not have a depth sensor. |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4, 1/5", GC02M1 | A52 has a higher-resolution macro camera. |
| Video | 4K@30fps with EIS; 1080p with EIS | 1080p@30fps | A52 can record higher quality videos with more stabilization; Redmi Note 11 Pro is limited to 1080p. |
| DXOMark | Not Available | Mobile: 78, Photo: 81, Video: 85 | Redmi Note 11 Pro camera performance is rated by DXOMark, A52 has no available score. |
| Camera Features | OIS, 4K, Quadruple camera | Triple camera, Manual Focus, RAW | A52 has OIS, better for stable videos; Note 11 Pro has a manual mode and RAW support for post-processing. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, max 14 | Android 11 | A52 is guaranteed a software update until Android 14. Redmi Note 11 Pro software update is unknown |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac, Dual-band | 802.11ac, Dual-band, MIMO | Both have similar Wi-Fi, Redmi Note 11 Pro has MIMO for potentially better connections. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, ANT+ | 5.2 LE, A2DP, AptX, LDAC, AAC | Redmi Note 11 Pro has newer Bluetooth; Redmi Note 11 Pro has better audio codec support. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, B1 | Redmi Note 11 Pro has additional BeiDou (B1) for more accurate location. |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Both support dual SIM functionality. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256GB | 64/128/256GB | Both offer similar storage options; Note 11 Pro has an additional lower-storage 64GB option, A52 doesnt |
| RAM | 4/6/8GB | 6/8GB | Both have sufficient RAM for most tasks, good for gaming and multi-tasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither support microSD card storage expansion, limited storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo, 2 mic | Redmi Note 11 Pro provides better audio quality overall, with hi-res support and improved voice capture |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Redmi Note 11 Pro provides a faster and more reliable fingerprint sensor access. |
| Build | |||
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Both phones have the same screen protection technology. |
| Sensors | Biometric, Proximity, Motion | Biometric, Motion, Proximity | Redmi Note 11 Pro has a better virtual proximity sensor and compass. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Better Video Recording: Supports 4K video recording with EIS, offering higher quality and more stable videos.
- Better Selfie Camera: Features a higher-resolution front camera with a wider aperture and larger sensor for better low-light selfies.
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Provides better stability for photos and videos, reducing blur from shaky hands.
- Quadruple Camera System: Includes a dedicated depth sensor, offering more flexibility in photography (though depth sensing could be implemented via software).
- Software Support: Guaranteed to receive software updates up to Android 14.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Advantages:
- Brighter Display: Offers significantly higher brightness, making it much better for outdoor use in bright sunlight.
- Faster Refresh Rate: 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and a more responsive feel compared to the 90Hz on the A52.
- Faster Charging: 67W fast charging will quickly refill the battery, reducing downtime.
- Larger Battery: Offers better battery life, which may last longer on a single charge.
- Better Performance: Higher benchmark scores and a more efficient GPU for better gaming and heavy app use.
- Better Audio Quality: Includes Hi-Res Audio and dual microphones for enhanced audio playback, better audio separation, and better voice capture during calls.
- More Accurate GPS: Supports BeiDou (B1) for better location accuracy.
- Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Faster and more reliable than the basic fingerprint sensor on the A52.
Trade-offs:
- The Samsung A52 has a better camera system for photos and videos, but a slower charging and display refresh rate compared to Redmi Note 11 Pro
- The Redmi Note 11 Pro has a faster charging, brighter display and more performance, but lacks OIS for video stabilization compared to the Samsung Galaxy A52.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 - Ideal for:
- Content Creators: Users who prioritize video recording and require optical image stabilization for smooth and clear footage and higher quality video.
- Social Media Enthusiasts: Those who often take selfies and use the front camera and want better low-light performance.
- Users who appreciate good software support and prefer a brand with stronger long-term update commitment: Guaranteed updates to Android 14.
- Users who value a more compact and lightweight phone.
- Users who need a device with the latest Samsung features and software experience
Use Cases:
- Filming vlogs and capturing high-quality videos on the go.
- Taking many selfies, especially in low light conditions.
- Using the phone for day-to-day social media and communication
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro - Ideal for:
- Gamers: Users who want better performance and smooth graphics with a higher refresh rate display.
- Outdoor Users: Those who need a bright display for easy visibility in sunlight and an overall brighter display screen.
- Power Users: Those who require a longer battery life and fast charging.
- Audio Enthusiasts: Users who appreciate high-quality sound with better audio codec support
- Users who value a larger screen with a higher refresh rate for media consumption
Use Cases:
- Playing mobile games with smoother graphics and responsive controls.
- Watching videos and consuming media on a bright screen with smoother refresh rates.
- Long hours of use, thanks to the large battery and fast charging.
- Listening to music with better audio quality, immersion and separation.
- Need a reliable device for location accuracy.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
How important is video recording quality and stability to you? If high-quality video recording with good stabilization is a top priority, the A52 is better. If video is not a priority, then the Note 11 Pro has other advantages.
Do you need a brighter display for outdoor use? If outdoor visibility is crucial, the Redmi Note 11 Pro is a much better option.
Do you want faster charging and a longer-lasting battery? The Redmi Note 11 Pro charges much faster and has a larger battery than the A52.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
Scenario 1: Social Media & Vlogging: Samsung Galaxy A52 is better due to its higher video quality (4K), OIS for stabilization, better selfie camera.
Scenario 2: Gaming & Outdoor Use: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better due to its smoother display, brighter screen, and more performance.
Scenario 3: Long Battery Life: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is the better choice with its larger battery and faster charging.
Scenario 4: General Purpose Usage: The choice depends on priorities: Samsung Galaxy A52 if photo/video is prioritized, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro for display brightness, and performance.
My Choice
If I had to choose, I would pick the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. While the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better camera system (especially for video with OIS) and a slightly more compact design, the Redmi Note 11 Pro's overall advantages are more relevant to my daily usage. I value the significantly brighter display for outdoor use, the smoother 120Hz refresh rate, the considerably faster charging, and the larger battery that will get me through the day. I also appreciate the better performance for gaming and heavy apps as well as the better audio quality for media consumption. Although the A52’s cameras and video stabilization are an advantage, it would be a secondary priority for me as an everyday user.
