1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | vivo X100 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 164.1 × 75.3 × 8.9 mm | vivo X100 Pro is slightly larger and thicker, which may feel less comfortable in smaller hands. |
| Weight | 189g | 221g | Samsung A52 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. |
| Foldable | Standard | Standard | Both are standard smartphones, not foldable. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | vivo X100 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.78" | vivo X100 Pro provides slightly more screen real estate for media consumption and productivity. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | vivo X100 Pro offers sharper and more detailed visuals due to higher pixel density. |
| PPI | 407 | 452 | vivo X100 Pro has slightly sharper text and images |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks typical of AMOLED displays. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | vivo X100 Pro has smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 3000 nits | vivo X100 Pro offers dramatically better visibility in bright sunlight, making it suitable for outdoor use. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | vivo X100 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (4nm) | vivo X100 Pro's chipset is significantly more powerful, leading to faster app loading, better gaming, and smoother multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 1,881,325 | vivo X100 Pro has vastly superior performance, making it a more future-proof device for demanding tasks. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | vivo X100 Pro has a much more powerful GPU, resulting in superior graphics processing for gaming and other graphics-intensive tasks. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | vivo X100 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP f/1.8, 1/1.7" Sony IMX682 | 50MP f/1.75, 1" Sony IMX989 | vivo X100 Pro's larger sensor size and wider aperture should result in better low-light performance and image quality despite the lower megapixel count. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP f/2.2, 1/2.8" Sony IMX616 | 32MP f/2.0, 1/2.8" Samsung S5KGD2 | vivo X100 Pro has a slightly wider aperture, which could allow for slightly better low-light selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP f/2.2 | 50MP f/2.0, 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1 | vivo X100 Pro's wide-angle lens is significantly sharper and brighter due to higher resolution and a wider aperture, providing superior landscape and group photos. |
| Portrait (Depth) Lens | 5MP f/2.4 | None | Samsung A52 has a dedicated depth sensor to improve the quality of portrait mode photos. vivo X100 Pro relies on software processing for bokeh effects. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP f/2.4 | None | Samsung A52 has a dedicated macro lens for taking close-up shots, while vivo X100 Pro doesn't offer such lens. |
| Telephoto + macro Lens | None | 50MP f/2.5, 1/2" Omnivision OV64B | vivo X100 Pro's telephoto lens provides better zoom capabilities and doubles as a macro lens. |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps with EIS | vivo X100 Pro captures higher resolution video and has better slow-motion capabilities, beneficial for videographers and content creators. |
| DXOMark Score | Not Tested | Mobile: 150 (Photo: 149, Video: 145) | vivo X100 Pro's camera performance is rated as excellent by DXOMark, indicating top-tier image and video quality. Samsung Galaxy A52 has not been tested. |
| Features | Quadruple camera, Digital image stabilization, OIS, Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous autofocus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night Mode | Cinematic Mode, Flicker sensor, Noise reduction, Optical zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, OIS, Ultra stable video, Gimbal, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Laser autofocus (LAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night Mode | vivo X100 Pro offers more advanced camera features such as Cinematic Mode, Gimbal, Laser autofocus, RAW capture, and better optical zoom for professional-level photography. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | vivo X100 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5400mAh | vivo X100 Pro's larger battery should provide significantly longer battery life for all-day use. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 100W Fast Charging | vivo X100 Pro charges much faster, which is very convenient for users needing a quick power boost. |
| Features | Non-removable, QC2.0 and AFC | Non-removable, Reverse charging, Wireless charging 50W | vivo X100 Pro offers more advanced battery features like wireless charging and reverse charging for other devices, but no specific mention of QC. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Lighter and More Compact: The A52 is noticeably lighter and slightly smaller, making it more comfortable for one-handed use and easier to carry.
- Dedicated Depth and Macro Lenses: The A52 has dedicated macro and depth cameras, potentially providing a wider range of photo options compared to the vivo.
- More Affordable: While the exact pricing is not listed, the A52 is generally a more affordable device and would be much cheaper.
- Better Screen Protection: A52 features Gorilla Glass 5, which provides better screen durability compared to vivo X100 pro that has an unknown screen protection.
vivo X100 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Dimensity 9300 chipset offers vastly superior performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and overall speed.
- Brighter, Sharper Display: The X100 Pro has a higher resolution and significantly brighter display, making it better for outdoor use and sharper images.
- Advanced Camera System: The X100 Pro features a top-tier camera with a large sensor, advanced features, and excellent DXOMark scores, offering superior image and video quality.
- Much Faster Charging: 100W charging allows for much faster battery replenishment, very convenient for users on the go.
- Larger Battery: The bigger battery provides more battery life for all day use.
- Newer Bluetooth and WiFi: The X100 Pro includes newer standards for both WiFi and Bluetooth providing better performance and access to new functionalities.
Trade-offs:
- Size and Weight: The vivo X100 Pro is bulkier and heavier, which could be a drawback for some users.
- No Depth or Macro Lens: While having better image quality overall, the X100 Pro lacks dedicated macro and depth lenses found in the A52.
- Potentially Higher Price: The X100 Pro is likely to be much more expensive due to its flagship features.
- Unknown screen protection: the protection of the screen is not mentioned for the vivo X100 pro, making it a potential concern for users that need a durable screen.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User:
- Budget-conscious users who want a reliable phone for everyday tasks.
- Users who prefer a lighter and more compact device.
- Users who occasionally take photos and don't need top-tier image quality.
- Users who value having more options for photography modes.
- Use Cases:
- Daily social media browsing, messaging, and email.
- Casual gaming.
- General photography needs.
- Basic video recording.
vivo X100 Pro:
- Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize top-tier performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
- Users who want a premium camera experience with excellent image and video quality.
- Users who need a phone with superior battery life and fast charging.
- Users who need a bright screen and want to use it outdoors often.
- Use Cases:
- High-end mobile gaming with demanding graphics.
- Professional photography and videography, with high-quality capture.
- Extended usage without needing frequent charging.
- Mobile workers who need to do intensive tasks.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Budget: How much are you willing to spend? (A52 is more budget-friendly)
- Performance Needs: How demanding are your tasks? (X100 Pro is superior in performance)
- Photography Preferences: Do you value top-tier image quality or a variety of lenses? (X100 Pro offers better quality but the A52 has more versatility in lenses)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget and Everyday Use: If your primary needs are everyday tasks and you're on a budget, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is the more sensible choice.
- Performance and Camera Quality: If you need a phone for heavy gaming, professional-level photography, and video recording, the vivo X100 Pro is the clear winner despite being much more expensive.
- Travel Photography Enthusiast: If you want to take beautiful and high quality photos while you travel, the vivo X100 Pro will be your preferred phone.
- Casual User and Durability If you need a phone for casual usage and you are concerned with damaging your device, the A52 would be a more sensible choice, due to it's screen protection.
My Choice
If I were to choose, I would pick the vivo X100 Pro, despite its higher cost and heavier build. Here's why:
Prioritization of Performance: I regularly use my smartphone for demanding tasks, including mobile gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking. The difference in performance between the two phones is significant, with the X100 Pro offering a much smoother experience.
Top-Tier Camera System: I highly value high-quality photography and videography. The X100 Pro’s superior sensor, wider aperture, and advanced camera features make it ideal for capturing high-quality images.
Future-Proofing: The X100 Pro is a more future-proof device with its flagship-level chipset and advanced features. This ensures a longer usable life before needing to upgrade.
Superior Battery and Charging: The significantly larger battery capacity combined with the exceptionally fast charging is a huge convenience. It ensures I can go through a whole day of heavy use without worrying about running out of power.
While the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a capable phone, the vivo X100 Pro would be my choice for its superior performance, advanced camera capabilities, battery life, and overall better experience despite being more expensive. The only drawback for me would be the lack of screen protection information and the lack of macro and depth lenses, but the pros outweight these cons by far.
