Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs. vivo X100
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | vivo X100 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2021-03-26 | 2023-11-21 | vivo X100 is significantly newer, benefiting from more recent technologies. |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5 mm | vivo X100 is slightly taller and thicker; marginal difference, negligible in practical use. |
| Weight | 189g | 202g | Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit lighter, potentially more comfortable for prolonged use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.78" | vivo X100 has a larger screen, offering a slightly more immersive experience for media consumption and gaming. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | vivo X100 has a much sharper display, making text and images appear clearer and more detailed. |
| Pixel Density | 407 ppi | 452 ppi | vivo X100 has a moderately sharper display than Galaxy A52. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both phones offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; negligible difference. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | vivo X100 has a smoother display, resulting in more fluid animations and scrolling. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 3000 nits | vivo X100 provides significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) | vivo X100 is vastly more powerful, handling demanding tasks and games much more efficiently and smoothly. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 1,881,325 | vivo X100 offers significantly higher performance for any tasks including gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | vivo X100 offers much better graphics performance, making gaming a noticeably better experience. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | vivo X100 offers slightly longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 120W fast charging | vivo X100 charges much faster, reducing charging downtime significantly. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.57, 1/1.31", 1.2µm | vivo X100 captures more light due to the larger sensor, resulting in better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | vivo X100 will produce slightly brighter selfies in low light due to wider aperture. |
| Telephoto Lens | None | 64MP, f/2.6, 1/2", 0.7µm | vivo X100 offers optical zoom, letting you get closer to subjects without quality loss. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 50MP, f/2.0, 1/2.76", 0.64µm | vivo X100 offers much higher resolution wide angle shots. Wider aperture allows better low light. |
| Portrait Mode | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | Samsung Galaxy A52 has dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | Samsung Galaxy A52 can take dedicated macro photos |
| Video | 4K@30fps, EIS | 4K@30fps, EIS, Slow-mo 960fps | Both offer 4K Video and stabilization, vivo has better slow-motion capabilities. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | vivo X100 has the latest Android version with more features and better performance. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) | vivo X100 offers much faster and reliable Wi-Fi connections. |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 | vivo X100 has newer bluetooth, offering better connection stability and more features. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, etc. | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, etc. | vivo X100 supports more satellite systems for more accurate location tracking. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256GB | 256/512/1024GB | vivo X100 offers much larger storage options, suitable for users with extensive media libraries. |
| RAM | 4/6/8GB | 12/16GB | vivo X100 offers significantly more RAM, allowing for smoother multitasking and app usage. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows for expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo | Both provide stereo sound and high quality audio with Dolby Atmos, vivo X100 supports higher quality audio with Hi-Res Audio |
| Security | |||
| Features | Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint Sensor | Both devices offer basic biometric security with fingerprint sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Samsung Galaxy A52 screen has better protection for scratches and drops |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Lighter Weight: More comfortable for prolonged use, especially one-handed.
- Dedicated Macro and Depth Sensors: Offers more versatility in photography with dedicated sensors, good for users who want more options with camera.
- Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 offer better screen protection than unknown.
vivo X100 Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Dimensity 9300 chipset provides significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
- Higher Resolution and Brighter Display: A much sharper and brighter display, offering a better viewing experience, especially outdoors.
- Faster Charging: 120W charging greatly reduces charging times, essential for users on the go.
- Superior Main Camera: Larger sensor and wider aperture provide better low-light performance and overall image quality.
- Telephoto Lens: Offers optical zoom, allowing for better photos at a distance.
- Latest Android OS: Runs on Android 14, offering the latest features and security updates.
- More RAM and Storage: Offers more memory for multitasking and significantly more internal storage.
- Latest Wi-Fi and Bluetooth: Supports new Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standard, improving transfer speeds, stability and energy efficiency
- Hi-Res Audio: Provides better audio output.
Trade-offs:
- The vivo X100's advantages come at the cost of a slightly heavier and larger device.
- Samsung A52 has better macro and depth sensors at the expense of a telephoto lens.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize a lighter, more affordable phone with good display and decent camera capabilities. Good for those who are not gamers or power users.
- Use Cases: Casual social media browsing, everyday photography, video streaming and users who are looking for a more budget friendly device.
vivo X100:
- Ideal User: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, excellent camera capabilities, and fast charging. Gamers, photographers, and power users will find this phone ideal.
- Use Cases: High-end mobile gaming, professional photography and videography, intensive multitasking, watching videos outdoors under direct sunlight and for those who have large media library.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- What is your budget? The Samsung Galaxy A52 is expected to be more budget-friendly than the vivo X100.
- How important is performance and gaming? If top-tier performance is a must, the vivo X100 is the clear winner.
- What are your camera needs? If low light photography and zoom capabilities are important, the vivo X100 is preferred. If you like a wide array of sensors like macro and depth, then Samsung Galaxy A52 is better
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget-Conscious User: If you're on a tight budget and need a reliable phone for everyday tasks, the Samsung Galaxy A52 may be a suitable choice.
- Performance Seeker: If you are a gamer or power user who needs top-tier performance, the vivo X100 is the superior choice.
- Photography Enthusiast: If camera quality and versatility are your priorities, the vivo X100 will offer better overall image quality, especially in low light and in zoom.
- Screen and Media Consumer: If you watch a lot of videos and enjoy a big screen, the vivo X100 offers a better experience with its higher resolution, brighter and smoother display.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two phones, I would choose the vivo X100. Although the Samsung A52 is a capable device, the vivo X100 has significant advantages in all the key area that I value such as: performance, camera quality, display quality and charging speed. These are areas that vastly improve the daily user experience. I am willing to pay the higher price for the significantly improved performance and superior feature. The vivo X100 has newer technology and will be more future-proof. Even though it is heavier, the increase in performance is worth the trade-off.
