1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 163.7 × 75.6 × 8.6 mm | Tecno is slightly taller and thicker, may feel less ergonomic for some. |
| Weight | 189g | 0g | The weight for Tecno Spark Go 2024 is listed as 0g which seems incorrect. Samsung Galaxy A52 is 189g, the listed weight for the Tecno is not correct. |
| Build | Standard | Standard | Both are standard smartphone designs. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Minimal difference in screen size, negligible in daily usage. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | Samsung Galaxy A52 has a noticeably sharper display, better for reading text and viewing high-resolution content. |
| PPI | 407 | 267 | Samsung's display is significantly sharper, less pixelation and clearer image for everyday use. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Samsung's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency for dark themes. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both phones offer a smooth scrolling experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | The provided value is inaccurate; both phones will have usable brightness, but this is not a meaningful comparison point. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Samsung's Snapdragon chip is more powerful, offering faster app loading and smoother multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 249,000 | The Samsung Galaxy A52 will be noticeably faster in benchmarks, better for gaming and demanding tasks. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MP1 | Samsung's Adreno GPU offers superior gaming performance, smoother graphics, and more detail. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.8µm | 13MP, f/1.9, 1.12µm | Samsung's 64MP sensor captures significantly more detail and performs better in low light conditions. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.8µm | 8MP, f/2.2, | Samsung's selfie camera will capture more detailed selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | N/A | The A52 has a dedicated wide-angle lens for landscape photography. The Tecno does not. |
| Portrait Mode (Depth) | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | N/A | The A52 has a dedicated depth sensor for better bokeh effect in portrait photos. The Tecno does not. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | N/A | The A52 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots. The Tecno does not. |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS; Yes; Slow-motion: 120 fps | 1080p@30fps; No; Slow-motion: 120 fps | Samsung Galaxy A52 offers higher quality videos with 4K resolution and has EIS, better for video recording. |
| Features | 4K, OIS, Quadruple, EIS | Dual Camera, PDAF | Samsung offers more advanced camera features with OIS, EIS and multiple lenses, and 4K video. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Tecno's larger battery offers longer usage between charges. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 10W fast charging | Samsung charges significantly faster. |
| Features | Non-removable, QC2.0 and AFC | Non-removable | Samsung offers faster charging through QC2.0 and AFC. |
Software & Connectivity
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 13 | The Tecno comes with a newer operating system out of the box, although the Samsung can be upgraded to Android 14. |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Both offer comparable Wi-Fi connectivity. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+ | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Samsung has more Bluetooth features, particularly relevant for connectivity with accessories like fitness trackers. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS | Samsung offers more accurate location services, supporting more GPS satellite systems. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano) | Both support dual SIM functionality. |
Storage & Audio
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal | 128 GB or 256 GB | 64 GB or 128 GB | Samsung offers more storage options, better for users with large collections of files and media. |
| RAM | 4 GB, 6 GB or 8 GB | 3 GB or 4 GB | Samsung offers more RAM, better for multitasking and performance intensive apps/games. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage |
| Audio | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | DTS / DTS X, Stereo Speakers | Samsung offers enhanced audio with Dolby Atmos, but both offer stereo speakers for immersive audio. |
Security & Build
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint Sensor | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | The side mounted fingerprint sensor on the Tecno is generally more ergonomic than a basic in-display sensor. |
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Samsung provides superior screen protection from scratches and drops. |
Sensors
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass | Samsung is equipped with more sensors, useful for motion sensing in games and other applications. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED panel with higher resolution and PPI, offering better visual quality.
- Higher Performance: More powerful Snapdragon chipset, offering better speed and gaming.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution cameras with more advanced features such as OIS, EIS, a wide-angle lens, and 4K video recording capabilities.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos for a more immersive audio experience.
- Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection for better durability.
- More RAM and Storage: Greater options for RAM and internal storage are available.
- More GPS options: Greater accuracy via use of GLONASS, Beidou and Galileo satellite systems.
- More Bluetooth Features: More features available for connectivity to other devices.
Tecno Spark Go 2024 Advantages:
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 13 out of the box.
- Larger Battery: Offers extended battery life with 5000 mAh capacity.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More ergonomic fingerprint sensor placement.
- Lower Price Point: The Tecno is generally a more affordable option.
Practical Implications:
- The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better for users who prioritize display quality, performance, camera capabilities, and fast charging.
- The Tecno Spark Go 2024 is better for users who want a more affordable option with longer battery life and a more ergonomic fingerprint sensor, where performance and camera quality are not the primary concern.
Trade-offs:
- Choosing the Samsung Galaxy A52 means paying a higher price for a superior display, camera, performance, and build quality.
- Choosing the Tecno Spark Go 2024 means sacrificing a high-quality display, camera, and performance for a lower price and slightly better battery life.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize a high-quality visual experience, good performance for gaming and multitasking, good camera capabilities, and a fast charging experience. This includes users who consume a lot of media, play mobile games, and take lots of photos.
- Use Cases:
- Media consumption (streaming, videos)
- Mobile gaming
- High-quality photography and videography
- Multitasking between apps
- Users seeking a more premium feel and better durability
- Price-to-Value: Offers better value for performance and overall experience, but at a higher price point.
Tecno Spark Go 2024:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who need a basic smartphone for daily tasks, longer battery life, and prefer an ergonomic fingerprint sensor. Performance and camera quality are not the main priorities.
- Use Cases:
- Basic communication (calls, messages)
- Social media browsing
- Light web browsing and app usage
- Users who need long battery life without constant charging
- Users who want a more ergonomic side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
- Price-to-Value: Offers good value as an affordable entry-level smartphone.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The Tecno is the more budget-friendly option.
- How important are camera quality, display quality, and performance? The Samsung Galaxy A52 excels in these areas.
- How important is battery life? The Tecno has a larger battery.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User: If the primary concern is a low price and you need long battery life, the Tecno Spark Go 2024 is recommended.
- Scenario 2: Performance and Camera Enthusiast: If you want a superior screen, a better camera system, better performance, and are willing to spend more, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is recommended.
- Scenario 3: Balanced Usage: If you want a good all-around experience with a focus on visuals and performance, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is better, but if you want something for basic tasks with good battery life, the Tecno is recommended.
My Choice
Given the choice, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. While the Tecno Spark Go 2024 has a larger battery and a newer OS, the A52 offers a significantly better overall experience. The AMOLED display, superior camera, faster performance, and higher-quality build materials make it a more compelling option for my needs. I value a good display for media consumption, a reliable camera for capturing memories, and a fast processor for smooth multitasking. While the price is higher, the added value is worth it for me.
The significantly better display, camera capabilities, faster performance and superior materials of the A52 outweigh the advantages offered by the Tecno for my usage patterns.
