Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Sony Xperia 10 III - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 June 11, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 86.92 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 189 g 169 g
Height 159.9 mm 154 mm
Width 75.1 mm 68 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 80.3 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 457 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 125.00 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 51.77 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver)
GPU Adreno 618 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 14 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Sony Xperia 10 III, focusing on real-world implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
Dimensions159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm154 x 68 x 8.3 mmThe Galaxy A52 is larger and wider, while the Xperia 10 III is more compact and easier to hold.
Weight189g169gXperia 10 III is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
Size6.5"6"Galaxy A52 offers a larger viewing area for media, gaming, and multitasking.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2520The Xperia 10 III has a slightly sharper display due to higher pixel density.
PPI407457The Xperia 10 III's screen will appear noticeably sharper, especially for text.
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzThe Galaxy A52 provides smoother scrolling and animations with a higher refresh rate, better experience for gaming
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness, making it unclear how they will perform in different lighting conditions

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm)The Galaxy A52's chipset is generally faster for everyday tasks and gaming.
AnTuTu Score341,212275,000The Galaxy A52 provides noticeably smoother app loading, and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 618Adreno 619LThe Galaxy A52 offers a slightly better gaming experience

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
Main Camera64MP, f/1.812MP, f/1.8Galaxy A52 captures much more detailed photos with its higher resolution sensor
Telephoto/Portrait LensNot Available8MP, f/2.4Xperia 10 III has an additional telephoto lens offering better zoom capabilities
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0Galaxy A52 produces much higher resolution selfies, while Xperia 10 III has a slightly wider aperture for low-light selfies.
Wide Angle Lens12MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Galaxy A52 offers wider and more detailed wide-angle shots
Portrait mode (depth)5MP, f/2.4Not AvailableGalaxy A52 offers a dedicated depth sensor for enhanced portrait effects.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.4Not AvailableGalaxy A52 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsBoth offer 4k recording, however, Galaxy A52 provides image stabilization at all recording settings
Camera FeaturesQuadruple camera, OIS, Ultra stable video, Night ModeTriple cameraGalaxy A52 offers advanced stabilization and a better low-light performance.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4500mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life.
Charging25W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingGalaxy A52 charges faster, meaning less time plugged into a charger.
Battery FeaturesQC2.0 and AFC, Non-removableNon-removableGalaxy A52 supports Quick Charge 2.0 and Adaptive Fast Charging technologies.

Software

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 14Android 11, upgradable to 13Galaxy A52 has better software support with a higher version upgrade

Connectivity

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
WiFi802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi DisplayBoth phones support similar WiFi capabilities.
Bluetooth5.0, LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, ANT+5.1, LE, A2DP, AVRCP, DIP, GAVDP, GAP, HFP, HID, HSP, MAP, PAN, SPP, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HDP, APT-x, LDAC, AACXperia 10 III has a more modern Bluetooth version and supports more codecs.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoXperia 10 III supports QZSS, potentially offering slightly better location accuracy in certain regions.

Storage & Security

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
Internal Storage128GB or 256GB128GBGalaxy A52 has the option for more storage.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB6GBGalaxy A52 offers up to 8GB of RAM, enabling better multitasking and gaming.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage
SecurityBasic fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorXperia 10 III has a more modern and potentially faster fingerprint sensor.

Audio & Build Quality

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Sony Xperia 10 IIIPractical Impact
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo SpeakersHi-Res Audio, 2 microphonesGalaxy A52 offers a richer audio experience with its stereo speakers, while Xperia 10 III prioritizes higher audio fidelity.
Build QualityCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 6Xperia 10 III has superior screen protection.
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, CompassGalaxy A52 includes a gyroscope for advanced motion-based gaming and apps.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • Larger, Smoother Display: The 6.5-inch 90Hz AMOLED display is more immersive and provides smoother animations and scrolling, enhancing the overall visual experience.
  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset offers noticeably faster processing for everyday tasks and gaming.
  • More Versatile Camera System: The 64MP main camera, along with dedicated depth and macro lenses, offers more flexibility and higher detail in photos and more detailed video with OIS.
  • Faster Charging: The 25W fast charging allows for quicker battery replenishment.
  • Enhanced Audio Experience: Stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos enhance multimedia consumption.
  • More Software Upgrades: Longer software support.

Sony Xperia 10 III Advantages:

  • More Compact & Lighter Design: The smaller form factor and lighter weight make it more comfortable to handle and carry.
  • Sharper Display: A higher pixel density display is noticeably sharper, particularly for text and detailed content.
  • Telephoto Lens: The dedicated telephoto lens provides optical zoom capabilities not available on the A52.
  • More Modern Bluetooth: The 5.1 version offers more advanced features.
  • Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 6 provides better scratch and drop resistance.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint: A more modern fingerprint scanner.

Trade-offs:

  • The Galaxy A52 is larger and heavier, which may not suit users who prefer compact phones.
  • The Xperia 10 III's processing power lags behind the A52, impacting gaming and multitasking performance.
  • The Xperia 10 III has a standard 60Hz refresh rate compared to the A52's 90Hz panel, making visual experience less smooth.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal Users:

  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who enjoy watching videos, playing games, and browsing social media will appreciate the larger, smoother display and the stereo speakers.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those looking for a versatile camera with high-resolution photos and features like OIS and dedicated portrait and macro lenses.
  • Power Users: Individuals who multitask, play games, and need fast charging for quick battery top-ups.

Use Cases:

  • Binge-watching Netflix or YouTube in high quality.
  • Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
  • Capturing detailed photos in various scenarios.
  • Multitasking between multiple apps.

Sony Xperia 10 III Ideal Users:

  • Users who prioritize portability: Those who prefer a compact, lightweight phone that is easy to carry and use with one hand.
  • Users who value a sharp display: Those who appreciate crisp text and detailed graphics.
  • Users who value photography with a bit of zoom: Those who often use the telephoto zoom
  • Audio Enthusiasts: Users who will utilize high-quality audio and Bluetooth features

Use Cases:

  • Reading ebooks or browsing websites.
  • Listening to high-resolution audio.
  • Taking pictures while on the go.
  • One-handed operation for quick tasks.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A52 offers better performance, display, and a more versatile camera system for a potentially slightly higher price point.
  • The Sony Xperia 10 III provides a more compact design, a sharper display and a more modern Bluetooth standard. However, it sacrifices in performance and has less versatile cameras.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three questions to guide a buyer's decision:

  1. Do you prioritize display size and smoothness or compact design and sharpness?
    • If you value an immersive, smooth, large screen go for Galaxy A52. If sharpness and one-handed use are key factors, then consider the Xperia 10 III.
  2. Do you need a versatile camera system or a simple, quality one?
    • For diverse photography needs with various lenses and stabilization, the A52 is better. If you primarily want good quality shots and optical zoom, go with the Xperia 10 III.
  3. Is performance a priority, or do you prefer long-lasting battery with better audio?
    • If you plan to play games, multitask and need a faster phone, the Galaxy A52 is better. For a compact device that is more audio focused, then go for the Xperia 10 III.

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Scenario 1: Mobile Gaming Enthusiast: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its superior performance, larger display, and smoother refresh rate.
  • Scenario 2: On-the-Go Photographer: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for more versatile cameras and image stabilization.
  • Scenario 3: Compact Phone Seeker: Choose the Sony Xperia 10 III for its compact design and comfortable one-handed use.
  • Scenario 4: Multimedia Consumer: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its immersive display, powerful speakers and faster charging capabilities.
  • Scenario 5: Audio Enthusiast: Choose the Sony Xperia 10 III for Hi-Res Audio, advanced Bluetooth features, and more advanced fingerprint scanner.

Personal Choice

If I had to choose, I would opt for the Samsung Galaxy A52. My primary use case involves multimedia consumption, occasional gaming, and photography, and the A52's larger, smoother display, superior performance, and more versatile camera system better cater to those needs. While I appreciate the compactness and sharpness of the Xperia 10 III, the A52's overall package aligns more closely with my priorities. The 90Hz display, faster charging, more capable main camera, and advanced stabilization features are more appealing in terms of enhancing my day-to-day usage experience. The added software updates are also a plus.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.