Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Samsung Galaxy A33 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 April 20, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 95.72 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 189 g 186 g
Height 159.9 mm 159.7 mm
Width 75.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 52.23 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, highlighting their practical implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Samsung Galaxy A33 5GPractical Impact
Dimensions159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mmA33 5G is slightly narrower and thinner, potentially feeling a bit more ergonomic and compact in the hand.
Weight189g186gNegligible difference; both are lightweight and easy to carry.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Samsung Galaxy A33 5GPractical Impact
Size6.5"6.4"Minimal difference in screen size; both offer a large display for multimedia consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both provide sharp and detailed images; negligible difference in visual clarity.
PPI407411Virtually identical pixel density; both offer similar levels of sharpness and clarity.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth have vibrant colors and deep blacks; excellent for watching videos and viewing photos.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations; noticeably smoother than standard 60Hz displays.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness information is missing. It is generally recommended to check reliable reviews for peak brightness on the specific models.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Samsung Galaxy A33 5GPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Exynos 1280 (5 nm)A33 5G's 5nm chipset offers better power efficiency and faster processing, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming.
AnTuTu Score341,212475,448A33 5G has a significantly higher score, indicating faster overall performance and snappier responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G68A33 5G's GPU is more powerful, providing better graphics performance in gaming and demanding applications.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Samsung Galaxy A33 5GPractical Impact
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" sensor, 0.8µm pixels48MP, f/1.8, 1/2" sensor, 0.8µm pixelsA52 has a higher resolution and larger sensor, leading to potentially better low-light performance and more detail.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" sensor, 0.8µm pixels13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" sensor, 1.12µm pixelsA52's selfie camera offers higher resolution, potentially capturing more detailed selfies.
Wide Angle Lens12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixels8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" sensor, 1.12µm pixelsA52 has a higher resolution wide-angle lens, potentially capturing more details in wide shots.
Portrait Lens5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm pixels2MP, f/2.4, pixel size is missingA52's portrait lens offers higher resolution, potentially creating more detailed depth effects in portrait shots.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm pixels5MP, f/2.4, 1/5" sensor, 1.12µm pixelsBoth offer similar Macro lens capabilities; suitable for capturing close-up details of small subjects.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsBoth record 4K footage at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps; both offer similar video quality with stabilization features.
Slow-Motion120 fps240 fpsA33 5G offers a higher slow-motion frame rate, capturing more detailed slow-motion footage.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Samsung Galaxy A33 5GPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhA33 5G has a larger battery, likely providing longer battery life and requiring less frequent charging.
Charging25W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer25W Fast Charging, Li-IonBoth support 25W fast charging, allowing for reasonably quick battery top-ups.
FeaturesNon-removable, QC2.0 and AFCBypass Charging, Non-removableGalaxy A33 offers the bypass charging feature, which reduces heat during charging while the phone is in use; Galaxy A52 has QC2.0 and AFC, offering quick charging for compatible chargers.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • Superior Camera Hardware: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras, as well as wide-angle and portrait sensors, which results in better overall picture quality and detail, especially in well-lit conditions.
  • Better Audio Features: Dolby Digital Plus offers an enhanced audio experience compared to just standard Dolby Atmos.

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Advantages:

  • Newer and More Powerful Chipset: The Exynos 1280 offers noticeably better performance, improved power efficiency and quicker multitasking. This will ensure a smoother user experience, especially for heavy users.
  • Larger Battery: 500mAh increase in battery capacity results in better battery life and overall usage time.
  • Better Slow-Motion Video: 240fps slow-motion capabilities allows for more detailed and dramatic slow-motion recordings.
  • Better Location Accuracy: More satellite systems provide improved location accuracy.

Trade-offs:

  • The A52's superior camera hardware is countered by the A33 5G's superior processor and battery life.
  • The A52 offers slightly better audio enhancement, but the A33 offers better performance and longer battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal Users:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who value camera quality and detailed photos will appreciate the higher-resolution sensors and the OIS capabilities.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who value the audio quality when watching videos will benefit from the Dolby Digital Plus for enhanced audio.
  • Moderate users: The phone is suitable for users who do not heavily rely on mobile gaming.

Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A52:

  • Capturing high-quality photos and videos, especially in good lighting conditions.
  • Enjoying multimedia content with superior audio quality, including music and videos.
  • Everyday tasks, including social media, browsing, and basic app usage.

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Ideal Users:

  • Performance Seekers: Users who prioritize smooth, lag-free performance for multitasking and gaming.
  • Heavy Smartphone Users: Individuals who need long battery life to last through a full day of heavy usage.
  • Mobile Gamers: Users who play graphics-intensive games and want smoother gameplay experience.

Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A33 5G:

  • Mobile gaming and running demanding apps that benefit from a more powerful processor.
  • Long work days, using apps and connectivity without the need to charge often.
  • Recording slow-motion video for creative projects or simply to capture fun, dynamic moments.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Galaxy A33 5G generally offers better value for its performance and battery life and its newer chipset, making it more appealing to performance-conscious buyers.
  • The Galaxy A52's slightly better camera setup might appeal to photography lovers, but it is older than the A33.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance and battery life to you? If performance and battery life are a priority, the A33 5G is the better choice.
  2. How often do you use the camera and how important is quality? If the camera is the most important feature, the A52 may be preferable, but the A33 also offers a good camera.
  3. What are the primary usage needs for your smartphone? If multimedia and better audio quality is important, the A52 would be slightly preferable, but if it is gaming, multitasking and battery life that are needed, then the A33 would be the better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Heavy Usage): If you are a heavy user who uses the phone a lot for gaming or apps, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is more suitable, due to its longer battery life, its more powerful chipset, and the 240fps slow-motion.
  • Scenario 2 (Camera Focus): If you are focused on taking high-quality photos, the Samsung Galaxy A52 has superior camera hardware with higher resolutions, and the OIS capability, making it preferable for better image detail.
  • Scenario 3 (Balanced Approach): If you need a good balance of all features, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is preferable due to its newer chipset and better performance, and better battery life, even though it has a lower camera resolution compared to the A52.

What I Would Choose and Why

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G. While the Galaxy A52 boasts a slightly better camera and audio features, the A33 5G's more powerful and more efficient processor, paired with its better battery life, offers a better overall user experience for everyday use and demanding tasks. Additionally, the A33 5G's newer Bluetooth version and its better GPS capabilities make it a more future-proof option. While photography is important, the A33 5G still offers a good camera setup. The performance and battery advantages tip the scales for me, ensuring a smoother and more reliable smartphone experience. The A33 5G also has a higher slow-motion capability which, as a more creative user, is of more use to me than just a better picture quality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.