1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm | A24 is slightly taller and wider, may feel slightly less comfortable in hand for some users. |
| Weight | 189g | 195g | A52 is slightly lighter, which may be noticeable during extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.5" | Both offer the same screen real estate for content consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Visually indistinguishable difference in sharpness for most users. |
| PPI | 407 | 396 | Very similar pixel density - both offer sharp images. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good viewing angles. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both provide smoother scrolling and animations compared to standard 60Hz. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | A24 has significantly higher brightness, which is much better for outdoor visibility. A52 brightness is not provided, which indicates a significant limitation in bright environments. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | A24's chipset is slightly more efficient due to a smaller process size and provides better overall performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 411,900 | A24 performs better in benchmarks, suggesting smoother everyday usage and faster app loading. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MC2 | A24's GPU is newer, potentially offering better gaming performance in some titles. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" sensor, Sony IMX682, 0.8µm pixels | 50MP, f/1.8, Unknown sensor, unknown pixel size | A52 has higher resolution sensor, larger pixel size and known sensor, potentially better low-light and detail capture. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" sensor, Sony IMX616, 0.8µm pixels | 13MP, f/2.2, unknown sensor, unknown pixel size | A52 offers significantly higher resolution selfies for better detail. |
| Wide-angle Camera | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixels | 5MP, f/2.2, unknown sensor, unknown pixel size | A52's wide-angle lens has much higher resolution, capturing significantly more detail. |
| Portrait (Depth) Camera | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm pixels | None | A52 has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode effects. |
| Macro Camera | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm pixels | 2MP, f/2.4, unknown sensor, unknown pixel size | A52 has a higher resolution macro lens. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps with EIS | A52 can record higher resolution, sharper videos, with a 60fps option for smoother footage. |
| Camera Features | 4K Video, Quad camera, OIS, EIS, Ultra Stable video, Continuous AF, Night Mode, etc. | Triple camera, OIS, EIS, PDAF, etc. | A52 offers more features like 4K recording, continuous autofocus, night mode, and has a quad-camera system. A24 uses PDAF. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | A24 has a larger battery, leading to longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | Both phones charge at the same speed. |
| Battery Features | QC2.0, AFC | None | A52 supports QC2.0 and AFC for faster charging using compatible chargers (feature is outdated). |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 13 (upgradable to 17) | A24 has a newer OS out of the box and will receive longer software support with more OS upgrades. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both support similar Wi-Fi standards. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 (LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, ANT+) | 5.3 (LE, A2DP) | A24 has a newer version of Bluetooth for better performance and power efficiency, A52 has more profiles supported. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | A24 supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano) | Both support dual SIM functionality. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 128GB or 256GB | 128GB | A52 offers larger storage options. |
| RAM | 4GB/6GB/8GB | 4GB/6GB/8GB | Both offer similar RAM options for multitasking. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Basic audio features | A52 offers a better audio experience with its enhanced features and stereo speakers. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | A24 has a more modern side-mounted sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | A52 has better screen protection with Gorilla Glass 5. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Both have necessary sensors. A24 has a compass and A52 offers light and hall sensors. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Camera System: Higher resolution main, selfie, and wide-angle cameras. Dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode and better macro lens.
- Higher Resolution Video: 4K video recording at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps for smoother footage.
- Enhanced Audio: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos and Digital Plus for better sound quality.
- Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 offers better scratch resistance.
- Wider Connectivity Profile: A wider variety of Bluetooth profiles, ANT+, light and Hall sensors.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:
- Newer Chipset: The Helio G99 offers a better performance and energy efficiency.
- Higher Brightness Display: Significantly better screen visibility under bright sunlight.
- Larger Battery: 500mAh more capacity for longer battery life.
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 13 and will receive more updates than the A52.
- More Modern Fingerprint Sensor: Side-mounted for easier access and more natural ergonomics.
- More Accurate GPS: Support for QZSS for better location tracking.
Trade-offs:
- A52: Better camera and audio, but is older and has inferior performance, less battery capacity, and a less bright display.
- A24: Better overall performance, battery life, and screen brightness but has inferior camera and audio capabilities compared to the A52.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Casual photographers and videographers who prioritize camera quality and audio experience, indoors, who don't mind a slightly older device.
- Use Cases:
- Capturing high-quality photos and videos of family events.
- Enjoying media consumption with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos.
- Users who prefer a phone with better protection from scratches.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G:
- Ideal User: Users who need a reliable phone for daily use with good battery life and a brighter screen for outdoor use and prefer a more modern device.
- Use Cases:
- Regular outdoor use where screen visibility is essential.
- Users who prioritize longer battery life and smoother performance over the best camera.
- Users looking for a phone with longer software support.
Price-to-Value:
- The A24 is the newer phone, potentially making it better value for money and will last longer in terms of software support. However, the A52 may offer better overall features in the camera department, but is much older.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- Camera Quality vs. Performance & Battery? Do you prioritize camera quality and advanced features or smoother performance and longer battery life?
- Outdoor Visibility? Do you often use your phone outdoors in bright sunlight?
- Software Support? How important is having the latest Android version and long-term software updates?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Photography Enthusiast - If you are a photography enthusiast or often capture videos and want better audio, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is better for you.
- Scenario 2: Outdoor User: If you use your phone frequently in bright sunlight and prioritize battery life, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is a better choice.
- Scenario 3: Balanced User - If you prefer a balance of performance, battery life and software support, and do not mind inferior cameras, choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G.
My Choice
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G. While the A52 has a superior camera system, the A24 offers a more balanced and modern package for my everyday needs. The brighter display is essential for outdoor use, and the improved chipset provides better performance and battery efficiency, which is something I value more over camera quality alone. Furthermore, the fact that it has a newer Android version and the promise of more upgrades down the line, makes it more future-proof. While I appreciate the better cameras in the A52, the other advantages of the A24 are more aligned with my usage patterns.
