Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs. Oppo Reno10
1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and the Oppo Reno10, focusing on the practical impact of each specification:
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Oppo Reno10 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Size | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 162.4 x 74.2 x 8 mm | The Reno10 is slightly taller and thinner, which might feel different in hand. |
| Weight | 189g | 185g | Both phones are very similar in weight, negligible difference |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Oppo Reno10 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.7" | Oppo Reno10 provides a slightly larger viewing area, beneficial for media consumption and gaming. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2412 | Visually identical sharpness, minor difference is not noticeable. |
| PPI | 407 | 394 | Both offer very sharp display, the minor difference is not noticeable. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both deliver vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high contrast ratios. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Reno10 offers smoother scrolling and animations, noticeably better for gaming and daily UI. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 950 nits | Oppo Reno10 is significantly brighter in outdoor use, easily visible under direct sunlight. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Oppo Reno10 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | The Dimensity 7050 in the Reno10 is more efficient and powerful, leading to smoother performance and better gaming experience. |
| Antutu Score | 341,212 | 541,500 | Oppo Reno10 has a significantly higher performance, providing faster app loading, snappier multitasking and improved gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G68 MC4 | Different GPU configurations, Reno10's GPU should offer better gaming capabilities |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Oppo Reno10 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" sensor | 64MP, f/1.7, 1/2" sensor | Samsung has a larger sensor potentially better low-light but the Reno10 has a wider aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8). |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" sensor | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor | Samsung's selfie camera has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2.4). |
| Telephoto Lens | None | 32MP, f/2.0, 1/2.74" sensor | Oppo Reno10 has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" sensor | Samsung's wide-angle has a higher resolution at the cost of sensor size, Reno 10 has a slightly larger pixel size which can help with low-light |
| Portrait Mode | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | Samsung has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | Samsung has a dedicated macro lens for closeup photos. |
| Video | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps with EIS | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@120fps with EIS | Oppo Reno10 supports higher frame rate video, and better EIS at different framerates and resolution. |
| Features | OIS, Quadruple camera, Night Mode, Ultra stable video | Optical zoom, triple camera, RAW, Phase detection autofocus | Samsung Galaxy A52 has OIS, Night Mode and an ultra stable mode. Oppo Reno10 has a telephoto camera with optical zoom. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Oppo Reno10 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Oppo Reno10 is likely to offer longer battery life between charges. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 67W Fast Charging | Oppo Reno10 charges much faster, significantly reducing charging times. |
Software, Connectivity, Storage, & Other
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Oppo Reno10 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 13 (upgradable to 14) | Oppo Reno10 comes with a newer OS version out of the box. Both will be upgradable to the same OS version |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | Oppo Reno10 has support for faster Wi-Fi with less latency. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 | Oppo Reno10 provides slightly faster connection speeds, greater range and more energy efficiency with Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Oppo Reno10 has more accurate location tracking. |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB or 256 GB | 256 GB | Both have the same maximum internal storage capacity. |
| RAM | 4 GB, 6 GB, or 8 GB | 8 GB | Oppo Reno10 ensures smooth multitasking due to its generous RAM |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage. |
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Basic | Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a superior audio experience. |
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Samsung Galaxy A52 has superior screen protection. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Audio: Features Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers, which offers a better audio experience.
- Camera versatility: It has a dedicated portrait depth camera and a macro camera, offering more flexibility in photography.
- Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 offers better screen protection compared to the unknown spec on Oppo.
Oppo Reno10 Advantages:
- Performance: Much faster chipset and higher benchmark scores providing superior performance for gaming and other demanding tasks.
- Display: Higher refresh rate (120Hz) and significantly higher brightness, leading to smoother animations and superior outdoor visibility.
- Battery & Charging: Larger battery capacity and much faster charging, offering better endurance and quick top-ups.
- Connectivity: Newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards offering improved data transfer and reliability.
- Telephoto Camera: Offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom.
- Video recording: 1080p video at higher frame rate (120fps) offering slow motion at higher resolution
Trade-offs:
- The Samsung A52 has OIS and superior sound, at the cost of performance and battery life
- The Oppo Reno10 prioritizes faster charging and better performance over a fully comprehensive camera suite, lacking a dedicated portrait and macro sensor.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal User:
- Multimedia Lovers: Users who prioritize audio quality and enjoy watching videos.
- Casual Photographers: Users who appreciate the versatile camera setup, specifically the macro and depth sensors.
- Budget-conscious users: Users looking for a mid-range phone with a good display and camera.
Use Cases:
- Enjoying media content with rich audio.
- Taking detailed close-up macro shots.
- Taking portraits with depth effects.
Oppo Reno10 Ideal User:
- Performance Enthusiasts: Gamers and users who demand smooth performance and fast loading times.
- Outdoor Users: Users who need a bright screen visible in direct sunlight.
- On-the-Go Users: Users who need fast charging and long-lasting battery life.
Use Cases:
- Playing graphic-intensive games.
- Using navigation apps under bright sunlight.
- Quickly charging the phone during a busy day.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is overall performance and gaming? If performance is a priority, the Oppo Reno10 is the better choice.
- How important is battery life and charging speed? The Oppo Reno10 offers superior battery life and much faster charging.
- How important are comprehensive audio and camera features like macro and depth sensors? The Samsung Galaxy A52 has superior audio and more camera flexibility.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Daily Use, Media Consumption If you use your phone for daily tasks, watching videos and want good audio, and don't need the best performance, consider the Samsung Galaxy A52.
- Scenario 2: Gaming and Performance If you prioritize gaming, and smoother overall performance, and fast charging, the Oppo Reno10 is ideal.
- Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiasts If you value macro and depth sensors, consider the Samsung Galaxy A52
- Scenario 4: Outdoor Usage: If you use your phone outdoors, need good display visibility, prioritize the Oppo Reno10.
Personal Choice
If I had to choose between the two, I would pick the Oppo Reno10. While the Samsung Galaxy A52 has some advantages like stereo speakers, and a more comprehensive camera suite, the performance difference in the Oppo Reno10 is too significant to ignore. The substantially faster charging and higher refresh rate display would be more beneficial for my daily use, as well as gaming. While I would like a macro sensor, I can live without it.
