Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Oppo A77 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A77
Oppo A77
Oppo

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 June 10, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 98.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.45 "/g
Weight 189 g 190 g
Height 159.9 mm 163.8 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Midnight Black
  • Ocean Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 50.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Oppo A77Practical Impact
Dimensions159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mmOppo A77 is slightly taller; Samsung Galaxy A52 is marginally thicker. This difference is unlikely to be noticeable in daily use.
Weight189g190gVirtually identical weight, both feel similar in hand.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild materials not provided, making it difficult to assess the "premium feel".

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Oppo A77Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.56"Both offer a large screen experience. Minimal difference in screen size.
Resolution1080x2400720x1612Samsung Galaxy A52 provides sharper images and text. Visible difference in clarity, especially for reading and detailed graphics.
PPI407269Samsung Galaxy A52 delivers significantly sharper and clearer visual experience. Noticeably less pixelated than Oppo A77.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDSamsung Galaxy A52 offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors, leading to a richer viewing experience especially when watching videos.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsIdentical brightness, making this spec not usable for a comparison.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Oppo A77Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm)Different chipsets, with 810 having a more modern architecture, but the practical difference will be reflected in the benchmark scores.
AnTuTu Score341,21242,000Samsung Galaxy A52 offers significantly better performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. Smoother experience when dealing with heavy apps and graphics.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G57 MC2Samsung A52 is expected to handle graphics more efficiently. Better gaming experience and smoother graphics for demanding applications.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Oppo A77Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh3200mAhSamsung Galaxy A52 has a significantly larger battery, likely providing longer battery life throughout the day, reducing the need for frequent charging.
Charging25W fast chargingNot specifiedSamsung Galaxy A52 charges faster, reducing time spent plugged into the wall. Oppo A77 charging speed is unclear, possibly slower than 25W.
FeaturesQC2.0 and AFCNot specifiedSamsung A52 features additional charging standards for faster speeds. Oppo A77 does not have any specified charging features.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Oppo A77Practical Impact
Standard Camera64MP f/1.8, 1/1.7" sensor, 0.8µm pixels13MP f/2.2Samsung Galaxy A52 takes more detailed and brighter photos, especially in low light. Better for capturing high-quality photos and videos.
Selfie Camera32MP f/2.2, 1/2.8" sensor, 0.8µm pixels16MP f/2.0Samsung Galaxy A52 captures higher resolution selfies; Oppo A77 may be slightly better in low-light. Samsung wins here due to significantly higher resolution.
Wide Angle Lens12MP f/2.2Not availableSamsung Galaxy A52 allows for capturing wider shots. Not available on Oppo A77, limiting the user's shot options.
Depth Sensor5MP f/2.4Not availableSamsung Galaxy A52 can take better portrait mode photos. No depth sensor means no portrait mode on Oppo A77.
Macro Lens5MP f/2.4Not availableSamsung Galaxy A52 can capture extreme close-ups, adding versatility to photography. Missing from Oppo A77.
Video4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS, Slow-motion: 120 fps1080p@30fps, No Slow-motionSamsung Galaxy A52 captures higher resolution video, while also having better video stabilization and slow-motion capabilities.
Camera Features4K Video, OIS, Quadruple camera, Night ModeBasic featuresSamsung Galaxy A52 is a much more capable camera, having features that Oppo A77 lacks.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED, higher resolution, and higher pixel density offer a significantly better viewing experience.
  • Better Performance: The Snapdragon 720G and higher benchmark scores indicate smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
  • Superior Camera System: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras, plus additional wide-angle, depth, and macro lenses offer greater versatility and higher quality images and videos.
  • Larger Battery & Faster Charging: 4500 mAh battery combined with 25W fast charging means significantly longer usage and less downtime.
  • Advanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers provide enhanced sound quality.
  • More sensors: Includes Gyroscope for enhanced gaming.
  • More storage and RAM: Comes in higher storage and RAM options, leading to better multitasking and file storage.

Oppo A77 Advantages:

  • Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 12 out of the box (but both can be updated to Android 14).
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Scanner: Offers more convenient access than a basic fingerprint scanner.
  • Slightly thinner The design is thinner by 0.4mm.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung Galaxy A52: Older launch date, might have an older design style compared to other newer phones.
  • Oppo A77: Significantly lower performance, much weaker camera system, inferior display quality, lower storage space and lower RAM.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal Users:

  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who prioritize vibrant display quality, immersive sound, and excellent video/photo capabilities.
  • Gamers: Those who enjoy mobile gaming and need smooth performance and responsiveness.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Individuals who value a versatile camera system with multiple lenses and quality features.
  • Power Users: Those who require fast processing, multitasking and longer battery life.

Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A52:

  • Watching movies and videos on the go.
  • Playing graphic-intensive games.
  • Taking high-quality photos and videos for social media or personal use.
  • Extensive web browsing and app usage.

Oppo A77 Ideal Users:

  • Basic Smartphone Users: Individuals who prioritize basic smartphone functionality over advanced features, performance, and higher quality cameras.
  • Budget Conscious Users: Those who seek an affordable smartphone with basic functionality.
  • Users who need a device for calls, text and browsing.
  • Users that prefer side mounted fingerprint sensor

Use Cases for Oppo A77:

  • Basic communication (calls, texts).
  • Light web browsing and social media use.
  • Simple photography and video.
  • Users that prefer a basic and easily navigable phone.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary usage? (e.g., gaming, photography, basic communication)
  2. How important is display quality? (e.g., crispness, vibrancy, brightness)
  3. What is your budget, and do you value performance more than price? (e.g., budget constraints, cost-benefit ratio)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High Performance & Photography Enthusiast - Recommend Samsung Galaxy A52. Its powerful chipset, superior camera system, and vibrant AMOLED screen make it ideal for demanding users who love gaming and photography.
  • Scenario 2: Basic Usage & Budget Conscious - Recommend Oppo A77. If you're primarily concerned with basic functionality (calls, text) and want to minimize expenses, the Oppo A77 may suffice. However, be prepared for a significant drop in quality compared to Samsung A52.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced User - Recommend Samsung Galaxy A52. Even if you are not in the high-performance user category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a far superior experience with its display, camera, performance and battery life, making it worth the extra price.

My Choice:

Given these specifications and user scenarios, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. Here's why:

  • Overall Experience: The Samsung Galaxy A52 provides a significantly superior user experience due to its AMOLED display, faster performance, vastly better camera system, and longer battery life. These are key factors that impact daily usage.
  • Future-Proofing: The A52's robust performance and better specifications mean it will remain usable and relevant for a longer period.
  • Camera Versatility: I value a good camera on a smartphone. The extra lenses, higher resolution, and better video recording on the A52 make it a great all-around device for capturing and sharing moments.
  • Price vs Value: If the price difference is marginal, the extra features and user experience are well worth the investment.

While the Oppo A77 is newer and may be cheaper, its drastically inferior performance, display, and camera capabilities don't align with my needs and preferences. I'd be willing to pay more for a substantially better user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.