1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Nokia X30 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 158.9 × 73.9 × 8 mm | The Nokia X30 is slightly more compact and slimmer, making it potentially more comfortable for one-handed use. The A52 is negligibly bulkier. |
| Weight | 189g | 185g | Both are nearly identical in weight, making no practical difference for most users. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.43" | Both have very similar display sizes. The slight difference is unlikely to be noticeable in daily use. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Identical resolution means similar sharpness and detail levels on both screens. |
| PPI | 407 | 409 | Virtually identical pixel density; no noticeable difference in sharpness. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both have vibrant AMOLED displays with deep blacks and excellent contrast. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer a smooth scrolling experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | No brightness information provided, limiting comparison. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | The Nokia X30's newer chipset provides better performance and efficiency. The 6nm process results in better power management and faster speeds. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 410,072 | The Nokia X30 is noticeably faster in benchmarks, translating to a snappier feel during everyday use and better gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 | The Adreno 619 in the Nokia X30 offers slightly better graphics performance, beneficial for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4200mAh | The A52 has a slightly larger battery, likely offering a bit more battery life on average. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer | 33W Fast Charging, Lithium | Nokia X30 charges faster than the A52. Charging from 0 to 100 will be noticeably faster on the Nokia X30. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Res | 64MP | 50MP | A52 offers higher megapixel count, which might result in slightly more detail, but also could mean a smaller pixel size. |
| Main Sensor Size | 1/1.7" | N/A | A52 sensor is larger in size which could lead to better low light performance but this can be offset by other image processing. |
| Selfie Camera Res | 32MP | 16MP | The A52's higher resolution selfie camera should capture more detail. |
| Selfie Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 | The A52's wider aperture lets in more light for better low-light selfies. |
| Wide Camera Res | 12MP | 13MP | Similar wide camera resolution. |
| Wide Camera Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 | Similar wide camera aperture, will not make any notable difference in image quality. |
| Depth Camera | 5MP | Not available | The A52 has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode photos, the Nokia does not. |
| Macro Camera | 5MP | Not available | The A52 has a dedicated macro camera for close-up shots, the Nokia does not. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps | Up to 1080p@60fps | A52 can record higher resolution videos. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 12 (upgradable to 13) | Nokia X30 has newer OS but less future OS update support. The A52 might have more customization options. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Up to 802.11ac | Up to Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | The Nokia X30 supports faster and more efficient Wi-Fi 6 for improved network performance when paired with a compatible router. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 | The Nokia X30 has slightly newer Bluetooth with support for better audio codecs, which can mean higher quality audio when using wireless headphones. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Nokia X30 provides more accurate location tracking with support for QZSS satellites. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both come in the same storage capacities. |
| RAM | 4GB/6GB/8GB | 6GB/8GB | The Nokia X30 offers higher RAM options, beneficial for multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage, so users should consider their storage needs when buying. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Basic audio | The A52 offers much richer audio experience through its speakers and headphones, providing an immersive media consumption experience. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | The X30 uses more recent, and more scratch resistant glass, offering a notably more durable screen. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- More versatile camera setup: Dedicated depth and macro sensors for more creative photography options.
- Higher resolution selfie camera: Provides more detailed selfies.
- Larger Battery: May offer slightly longer battery life.
- Better audio: Enhanced audio experience with Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers.
- More OS Update Support: Likely to receive more future Android updates.
- More sensors: Hall, Geomagnetic sensors
Nokia X30 Advantages:
- Newer, more powerful processor: Better performance in benchmarks and everyday use.
- Faster Charging: The 33W fast charging will charge your phone quicker
- Newer Bluetooth version for higher-quality audio experience
- Superior Screen Protection: Better scratch and damage resistance.
- More accurate GPS: The Nokia supports more satellite systems
- Better Wifi: Supports faster and more efficient wifi 6.
Trade-offs:
- The A52 offers a more versatile camera setup, but the X30 has the better primary sensor.
- The A52 might have a longer battery life, but it has slower charging speeds than X30.
- The A52 provides more OS update support, but the X30 will likely be a more powerful phone for longer.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Users who value versatile camera systems, enhanced audio experience, and want to have the latest android updates.
- Use Cases: Social media enthusiasts who often capture photos, users who consume a lot of video, people that prioritize better OS support, and casual gamers.
- Price-to-Value: Good value for users who prioritize camera features and audio quality.
Nokia X30:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize performance, durability, and future-proofing.
- Use Cases: Gamers, power users, and individuals seeking long-term reliability and good wifi and GPS.
- Price-to-Value: Good value for users who seek premium features and faster performance.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is camera versatility? If you value a dedicated depth and macro camera, the A52 is a better choice.
- Is performance or battery life more critical for your daily usage? If performance is paramount, the X30 is better. If battery life is more crucial, the A52 might be a better choice.
- How long do you plan to keep the phone? If you like to have more OS support for the future, the A52 may be a better option. If you want a more durable and faster phone long term the X30 may be a better choice.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Photography Enthusiast: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its versatile camera system and higher resolution selfie camera.
- Power User/Gamer: Choose the Nokia X30 for its superior performance, faster charging, and newer technology.
- General User with Budget: If all the features are more or less equal for your usage, take the phone that is cheaper.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally choose the Nokia X30. While the Samsung A52 has a more versatile camera system, the improved performance of the Nokia, coupled with the more durable build quality and faster charging speeds, makes it a more appealing option for my usage. I also value future-proofing, and the Nokia X30's more recent chipset and other technology will ensure a longer lifespan for my phone. While I would love the A52's more versatile cameras, the X30's main camera is still great.
