1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 166 × 75.9 × 8.6 mm | Nokia G60 is taller and slightly thicker, impacting pocketability and one-handed use. |
| Weight | 189g | 190g | Negligible difference in weight, both feel similar in hand. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.58" | Very similar screen sizes; negligible difference in screen real estate. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | Virtually identical sharpness; not noticeable in everyday use. |
| PPI | 407 | 401 | Very similar pixel density; no real difference in display clarity. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, which is especially beneficial when viewing photos or videos and using dark mode. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz on Nokia G60 leads to slightly smoother scrolling and animations, noticeable in fast-paced content. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness data is missing, making it hard to assess performance in bright sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) | Snapdragon 695 5G (Nokia G60) is generally more efficient and powerful than the Snapdragon 720G, which translates to better overall performance and responsiveness, and better 5G support. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 410,072 | Nokia G60 scores higher in benchmarks, suggesting a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 in Nokia G60 offers better graphics performance than Adreno 618, providing smoother gaming and video playback. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4500mAh | Both phones have identical battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life under normal usage. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging, Li-Polymer | 20W fast charging, Lithium | Samsung Galaxy A52 charges slightly faster, which can be convenient in a hurry. |
| Features | Non-removable, QC2.0 and AFC | Non-removable | Samsung A52 has additional QC2.0 and AFC which provides fast charging options. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Resolution | 64MP (f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm) | 50MP (f/1.8, 0.7µm) | Higher resolution on Galaxy A52 allows more detailed photos, especially when cropping; larger sensor size may offer better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 32MP (f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm) | 8MP (f/2.0, 0.64µm) | Significantly higher resolution for selfies on Galaxy A52, resulting in sharper, more detailed images. Wider aperture on Nokia G60 allows more light. |
| Wide-Angle Lens Resolution | 12MP (f/2.2, 1.12µm) | 5MP (f/2.0, pixel size missing) | Galaxy A52 captures more detailed wide-angle shots; wider aperture on Nokia G60 may offer a slightly better low-light performance. Pixel Size of Nokia missing. |
| Portrait Lens Resolution | 5MP (f/2.4, 1.12µm) | 2MP (f/2.4, pixel size missing) | Higher resolution on Galaxy A52 suggests better bokeh quality. Pixel size on Nokia G60 is missing. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP (f/2.4, 1.12µm) | None | Galaxy A52 has a dedicated macro lens, enabling close-up photography, which is lacking on the Nokia G60. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | Galaxy A52 captures higher resolution video, useful for more detailed video recordings; better video stabilisation on the Galaxy A52. |
| Camera Features | OIS, Ultra stable video, Quadruple camera | Contrast detection autofocus (CDAF), Triple Camera | Samsung Galaxy A52 offers Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS) which provides smoother video recording and sharper photos in low light; Samsung A52 features 4 rear cameras, whilst the Nokia G60 features 3. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 14) | Android 12 | Nokia G60 has a slightly newer Android version out of the box. The Samsung A52 is upgradable to the latest version. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | WiFi 6 (802.11ax) | Nokia G60 supports newer Wi-Fi standard, offering faster speeds, lower latency, and better performance in congested networks. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 | Nokia G60 has a newer Bluetooth version, potentially offering better connectivity stability and improved battery efficiency with supported devices. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Nokia G60 offers better location accuracy with QZSS support |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano SIM + eSIM) | Nokia G60 offers the flexibility of an eSIM, which can be convenient for frequent travelers or users with multiple phone numbers. Samsung A52 has two physical slots. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB or 256 GB | 64 GB or 128 GB | Samsung Galaxy A52 has greater storage options for users who store large amounts of media and files. |
| RAM | 4 GB or 6 GB or 8 GB | 4 GB or 6 GB | Samsung Galaxy A52 provides higher RAM options for smoother multitasking and gaming. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone allows for extra memory expansion. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Basic audio features | Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a superior audio experience with Dolby Atmos, enhancing spatial audio and providing better separation. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Nokia G60 offers a more modern side-mounted sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Both phones offer identical screen protection. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Samsung A52 has more sensors, which is useful for gaming and VR. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast compared to the IPS LCD of Nokia G60, enhancing viewing experiences.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution main, selfie, wide, portrait, and a dedicated macro lens provide more versatility and details. Optical Image Stabilization improves video and low-light photos.
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers provide a more immersive audio experience.
- Greater Storage and RAM Options: Up to 256GB storage and 8GB RAM offer more space for files and better multitasking capabilities.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging is faster than the 20W charging of the Nokia G60.
- Comprehensive Sensors: Hall sensor and geomagnetic sensor.
- More upgradeable OS: Upgradable to Android 14.
Nokia G60 Advantages:
- Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a slightly smoother visual experience than the 90Hz on Galaxy A52.
- Better Performance: Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers better overall performance and 5G support.
- More advanced Bluetooth: Nokia G60 has the better Bluetooth 5.1.
- Newer Wi-Fi Standard: Wi-Fi 6 support offers faster and more reliable wireless connections.
- eSIM Support: More flexibility in terms of connectivity, which is convenient for international travelers or using multiple phone numbers.
- More accurate GPS: QZSS support provides additional support for more accurate GPS.
- Newer Android Version Out-of-the-Box: Comes with Android 12.
- Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More modern and convenient compared to the basic sensor on the Samsung A52.
Trade-offs:
- Display: The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a more vibrant display (AMOLED) whereas the Nokia G60 has a smoother refresh rate (120Hz).
- Performance: The Nokia G60 offers a more powerful processor, but the Samsung A52 offers better multitasking due to its better RAM and storage options.
- Camera: The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a more versatile camera system with higher resolution, OIS and dedicated macro lens, but Nokia G60 has a wider aperture in certain lenses and more modern software.
- Connectivity: The Nokia G60 offers newer Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 standards, but Samsung Galaxy A52 has more sensors.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize media consumption, photography, and a premium display experience.
- Use Cases:
- Watching movies and videos with rich colors and deep blacks.
- Taking high-quality photos and selfies with detailed image output.
- Casual gaming due to the additional RAM option.
- Users who use their phones for media and entertainment purposes.
- Users who want good sound quality with their phone.
- Users who like macro photos.
Nokia G60:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize performance, fast internet connectivity, and a smooth display experience.
- Use Cases:
- Demanding mobile games that benefit from better processing power and a higher refresh rate.
- Frequent travelers who want to benefit from eSIM capability.
- Users who want more accurate GPS location data.
- Users who need reliable and fast network performance and appreciate newer tech like Wi-Fi 6.
- Users who want a reliable, stock Android experience.
- Users who want a modern fingerprint sensor on the side of the phone.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Samsung Galaxy A52 may have a slightly higher price point due to its AMOLED display, better camera system, and advanced audio. It provides more value for users focused on media.
- The Nokia G60 may offer a better price-to-performance ratio, with its focus on processing, connectivity, and a smoother display. It provides more value for users focused on performance and speed.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Display Priority: Do you prefer a vibrant AMOLED display (Samsung Galaxy A52) or a smoother 120Hz refresh rate (Nokia G60)?
- Camera Needs: Do you need versatile camera capabilities with high resolution and OIS (Samsung Galaxy A52), or is basic shooting sufficient (Nokia G60)?
- Performance vs Connectivity: Do you prioritize overall performance and 5G capability (Nokia G60) or greater storage, RAM and sensor suite with slightly slower processor (Samsung Galaxy A52)?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (Media Enthusiast): If your main use is watching videos, taking photos, and listening to music, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is the better choice due to its superior display and audio.
- Scenario 2 (Gaming & Performance User): If you primarily game and need a smoother user experience, the Nokia G60 is the better option with its faster processor and 120Hz display.
- Scenario 3 (International Traveler): If you need eSIM support and reliable connectivity while travelling, the Nokia G60 is the better option.
What I Would Choose and Why
Based on my needs, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. Here's my reasoning:
- Display Quality: I value a vibrant display with deep blacks and rich colors for media consumption. The AMOLED display on the A52 is a clear winner in this aspect.
- Camera Versatility: I take a lot of photos and the higher resolution sensors, along with the optical image stabilization, on the Samsung Galaxy A52 provide better photo quality in a wider range of scenarios. The dedicated macro lens and versatile camera suite would be valuable.
- Storage: I tend to use a lot of internal storage for apps, media and photos. The higher storage options of the A52 are a must for me.
- Audio Quality: I enjoy good sound quality and would enjoy the Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers which would enhance the user experience whilst consuming media.
- Usage: My main usage of my smartphone includes media consumption and social media, which would be better with the richer screen on the A52 and better camera system.
While the Nokia G60 has a faster chipset and a smoother display, the A52's overall package for media and camera performance aligns better with my preferences and use case. Additionally, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is still a very capable phone and has enough processing power to handle the day-to-day tasks. The slightly faster charging of the A52 is a nice bonus.
