1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Moto G85, focusing on real-world implications:
Design & Build
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G85 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 161.9 × 73.1 × 7.6 mm | The Moto G85 is taller but narrower and thinner, potentially more comfortable to hold. The A52 has a larger overall volume, which could feel bulkier. |
Weight | 189g | 171g | The Moto G85 is significantly lighter, which can improve comfort during extended use and reduces fatigue. |
Build Material | Not Specified | Not Specified | Impact on durability and feel in hand. Without the exact material specification, this remains a general quality factor |
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Both offer similar protection against scratches and minor impacts. |
Display
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G85 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Size | 6.5" | 6.67" | The Moto G85 has a slightly larger screen, offering a marginally more immersive viewing experience. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both have the same Full HD+ resolution, providing sharp and detailed visuals. |
Pixel Density | 407 PPI | 395 PPI | Both have very similar pixel density, resulting in comparable sharpness. |
Technology | AMOLED | P-OLED | Both provide vibrant colors and good contrast with minimal difference between display technologies |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | The Moto G85 offers a smoother experience for scrolling and animations, making the UI feel more responsive. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 1600 nits | The Moto G85 offers significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight conditions. |
Performance
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G85 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | The Moto G85 has a newer and more efficient chipset, offering better performance and potentially better battery life. |
AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 475,000 | The Moto G85 scores significantly higher in benchmarks, indicating smoother app loading, better gaming performance, and overall responsiveness. |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 | The Moto G85's newer GPU likely offers slightly better graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps. |
RAM | 4/6/8 GB | 8/12 GB | The Moto G85 offers substantially more RAM, which is beneficial for heavy multitasking and ensures smoother performance with multiple apps open. |
Camera
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G85 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682 | 50MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Sony LYT-600 | The A52 has a higher resolution sensor, but the Moto G85's larger pixels and wider aperture can capture more light and detail in low-light conditions. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616 | 32MP, f/2.4 | The A52's slightly wider aperture can improve selfie performance in low light. |
Ultrawide Camera | 12MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | The A52 captures ultrawide photos with more detail due to its higher resolution. |
Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not present | A dedicated macro lens on the A52 can capture closeup details that the G85 cannot. |
Depth Sensor | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not present | The A52 can take more accurate portrait photos with enhanced background blur. |
Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps | The A52 has 4k recording for those who need higher resolution video. |
Slow-Motion | 120 fps | 30 fps | The A52 offers more detail in slow-motion videos. |
Camera Features | 4K Video, Quadruple camera, Ultra stable video, Continuous autofocus, Night Mode | Dual camera, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Laser autofocus (LAF), RAW | The A52 provides a wider range of camera modes and features while the G85 has faster focus and better manual controls (RAW). |
DxOMark Score | Not Tested | 88 (Photo: 83, Video: 109) | Moto G85 has a decent camera score from DxOMark. |
Battery
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G85 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | The Moto G85 offers longer battery life, allowing users to go longer between charges. |
Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 30W Fast Charging | The Moto G85 has a slightly faster charging speed, reducing the time it takes to recharge the battery. |
Battery Features | QC2.0, AFC | None specified | Both feature non-removable batteries, but Samsung Galaxy A52 offers wider charging support. |
Other Features
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G85 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Operating System | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | The Moto G85 ships with a newer version of Android, providing the latest features, security updates and potentially longer software support. |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | The Moto G85 offers faster speeds and improved network performance. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 | The Moto G85 has a newer Bluetooth version which is more energy efficient and offers wider compatibility. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | The Moto G85 provides better location accuracy due to more satellite systems. |
SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM + eSIM | The Moto G85 provides more flexibility with an eSIM for secondary network use. |
Storage | 128 GB / 256 GB | 128 GB / 256 GB | Both provide the same storage options |
Expandable Storage | No | No | No option for storage expansion on either device. |
Audio | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | The A52 has slightly better spatial audio capabilities while the G85 has 2 microphones for enhanced audio recording. |
Security | Basic fingerprint sensor | Basic fingerprint sensor | Both provide basic biometric security with a fingerprint sensor. |
Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Both feature all common sensors, with Moto G85 also offering a Compass. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- More versatile camera system: Offers a dedicated macro lens and depth sensor, and has a higher resolution ultrawide camera, catering to more diverse photography needs. It also supports 4K video recording which the Motorola doesn't.
- Enhanced Audio: Supports Dolby Digital Plus and has a higher range of audio features for a richer experience.
- Wider Charging Support: Features QC2.0 and AFC for potentially better fast charging compatibility.
- More slow motion video detail: Supports higher FPS slow motion recording.
Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:
- Superior Performance: Newer and more efficient chipset, significantly higher benchmark scores, and more RAM make it faster and smoother for multitasking, gaming and demanding apps.
- Larger and Smoother Display: Offers a slightly larger screen with a 120Hz refresh rate, providing a more fluid visual experience and enhanced viewing.
- Significantly Brighter Display: 1600 nits brightness is better for viewing in bright sunlight
- Longer Battery Life and Faster Charging: Larger battery capacity and slightly faster charging speed for all-day usage.
- Newer Software: Ships with Android 14 providing the latest features.
- Enhanced Connectivity: Supports Wi-Fi 6 for faster internet speeds and a newer Bluetooth 5.1 version.
- Better Location Accuracy: Includes QZSS satellite support for improved location tracking.
- eSIM support: Offers eSIM for digital carrier switching.
- Better low light photos: Due to wider aperture and larger pixel size on main camera.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Camera versatility: The Moto G85 lacks a dedicated macro lens and a depth sensor, limiting its flexibility in different photography scenarios.
- Video recording: Moto G85 doesn't offer 4K recording and has less slow motion video detail.
- Audio quality: Moto G85 misses Dolby Digital Plus which may be missed for some users.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 is ideal for:
- Photography enthusiasts: Those who prioritize a versatile camera system with different lenses and modes.
- Multimedia consumers: Users who enjoy consuming content with enhanced audio (Dolby Digital Plus) and prefer 4K video recording capabilities.
- Users with existing Samsung Ecosystem: Preferring a more established brand ecosystem and are already invested in Samsung's products or services.
- Users looking for a good mid-range camera
Use Cases:
- Taking detailed macro photos of nature or small objects.
- Capturing high-resolution ultrawide landscapes or group photos.
- Watching 4K videos with enhanced sound quality.
- Users who prioritize slightly better camera capabilities over peak performance.
Motorola Moto G85 is ideal for:
- Performance-focused users: Those who prioritize smooth and responsive performance for multitasking and gaming.
- Users requiring better battery life: Those who need a phone that can last all day without needing to be charged frequently.
- Users who value outdoor visibility: Those who need to use their phone in bright sunlight.
- Users who value the latest software: Those who prefer the latest android OS version.
- General purpose users: Great all round performer in most use cases.
Use Cases:
- Playing graphically intensive games with smooth frame rates.
- Multitasking between multiple apps without experiencing slowdowns.
- Using the phone in bright outdoor conditions.
- Users who prioritize peak performance and battery life above camera features.
- Users who prefer a simple user experience with minimal bloatware
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is camera versatility? (Macro, depth, 4K recording).
- How important is peak performance and battery life? (For gaming and heavy use).
- Do you prioritize the latest software and connectivity? (Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1, Android 14).
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Camera Enthusiast: If you frequently take photos in various scenarios and want the most diverse camera system, the Samsung Galaxy A52 would be more suitable.
- Scenario 2: Performance User: If you prioritize smooth performance, long battery life, and a better display, the Motorola Moto G85 is the better choice.
- Scenario 3: Balanced User: If you are looking for a balance of performance and features, consider whether the camera differences or the performance and battery advantages are more critical to you personally.
My Choice
If I had to choose, I would pick the Motorola Moto G85.
Reasons:
While the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a more versatile camera setup, the Motorola Moto G85 offers a superior overall experience for my typical use cases. The significantly better performance due to the newer chipset and more RAM is a major advantage, leading to smoother multitasking and gaming. The larger display with a 120Hz refresh rate makes everyday use more fluid and enjoyable, and the greatly improved brightness is essential for comfortable use in bright conditions. Additionally, the longer battery life and faster charging are very appealing, ensuring I wouldn't be caught off guard with a dead battery. Lastly, I prefer the latest android OS version and would also like faster internet speeds with Wi-Fi 6.
While I may miss the dedicated macro lens, the overall gains in performance, display quality, and battery life outweigh the drawbacks. For me, the Motorola Moto G85 provides a better balance of practical benefits and overall value for daily use.