1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 161.2 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm | Similar size, slight difference may affect grip and pocket fit, the Motorola is slightly taller but less wide. |
| Weight | 189g | 179g | Motorola is 10g lighter, which may be noticeable for extended holding. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.4" | Negligible difference in screen size. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Identical sharpness. |
| PPI | 407 | 411 | Virtually the same pixel density. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good viewing angles. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 60Hz | Samsung A52 has smoother scrolling and animations, making it feel more responsive. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both peak brightness at 0 nits, which is not very useful for comparison. (Note: these values seem incorrect. Real-world testing would be needed). |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Moto G71 has a slightly newer and more efficient chipset which can lead to better performance in demanding tasks and better battery life. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 396,564 | Motorola Moto G71 shows slightly better overall performance. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 | Motorola's newer GPU offers better graphics performance. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Motorola Moto G71 is likely to offer longer battery life per charge. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 33W Fast Charging | Motorola Moto G71 charges faster, reducing downtime. |
| Features | QC2.0, AFC | Non-removable | Samsung A52 offers additional proprietary charging features. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Main Cam | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682 | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung A52 has higher resolution, larger sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and more detailed photos. |
| Front Cam | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616 | 16MP, f/2.2 | Samsung A52 offers higher detail in selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | Samsung A52 captures wider scenes with more detail. |
| Portrait Mode (depth) | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not available | Samsung A52 has a dedicated depth sensor for bokeh effects. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | Samsung A52 offers better macro shots with more detail. |
| Video | 4K@30fps w/ EIS, 1080p@60fps w/EIS | 1080p@60fps | Samsung A52 records higher resolution video, along with EIS for all recording options. |
| Camera Features | OIS, Quad, Night Mode, 4K Video | Optical Zoom, Triple, PDAF, LAF, RAW | Each offers a different set of photography features to cater to a different style. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, Max version 14 | Android 11, Max version 12 | Samsung provides longer software support for its phone which means it will receive more updates. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both support current Wi-Fi standards. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+ | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Samsung A52 has additional Bluetooth features. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Both offer solid location services, Motorola supports SUPL as well. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano) | Both offer dual SIM functionality. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256 GB | 128 GB | Samsung A52 offers up to 256 GB of internal storage. |
| RAM | 4/6/8 GB | 6/8 GB | Both offer similar RAM options. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports microSD card. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, 2 microphones | Samsung A52 offers a more immersive audio experience with stereo speakers, while the Motorola has 2 microphones for better audio recording. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Rear-mounted fingerprint sensor | Both offer a similar level of security using fingerprint sensors. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Samsung A52 has better screen protection. |
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Geomagnetic | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Samsung has better options when it comes to sensors |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: 90Hz refresh rate for smoother visuals, enhancing the overall user experience.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution main, selfie, wide and macro cameras offer more detail and versatility, dedicated depth sensor, and 4K video recording.
- Enhanced Audio: Stereo speakers for a more immersive audio experience.
- Longer Software Support: The phone is eligible for more updates
- More Internal Storage Options: Comes in 128 GB and 256 GB
Motorola Moto G71 5G Advantages:
- Better Performance: Marginally faster processor and GPU for smoother multitasking and gaming.
- Longer Battery Life: Larger battery for extended use without needing to recharge.
- Faster Charging: 33W charging gets you back up and running quicker.
- Additional GPS support: Supports SUPL
Trade-offs:
- Samsung A52: While it has a superior camera and display, it has a slightly older chip, and a smaller battery with slower charging.
- Motorola G71 5G: The camera is not as versatile as the Samsung, the display is only 60Hz and it lacks stereo speakers.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 - Ideal User:
- Content Consumers: Users who enjoy watching videos, browsing social media, and prefer a smoother experience with a high refresh rate.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Those who value a versatile camera system with high-resolution images, OIS, and 4K video recording.
- Multimedia Lovers: Appreciate good sound quality with stereo speakers and need more storage space.
Users seeking long-term software support Prefer longer software support.
- Use Cases: Social media browsing, casual gaming, photography, videography, watching movies/TV shows, streaming music.
Motorola Moto G71 5G - Ideal User:
- Power Users: Users who prioritize battery life and need a phone that can last a full day on a single charge.
- Gamers: Those who prefer slightly better performance and are less demanding on display smoothness.
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users looking for a solid all-around phone with decent specs at a reasonable price.
Users who do not prioritize camera versatility: The camera is decent enough but lacks features such as 4K recording and optical image stabilization.
- Use Cases: Everyday tasks, moderate gaming, long commutes, general use.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display smoothness and media consumption? If smooth scrolling and vibrant media is important, the Samsung A52's 90Hz display and stereo speakers are better.
- Do you prioritize camera quality and features? The Samsung A52 offers better camera quality and more versatility with its quadruple-camera setup.
- How crucial is battery life and fast charging? If you need all-day battery and fast top-ups, the Moto G71 5G will be better suited.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Social Media & Media Consumption: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its smoother display and better speakers.
- Scenario 2: Long-Lasting Battery & Daily Tasks: The Motorola Moto G71 5G is more suitable with its larger battery and faster charging.
- Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy A52 is the better choice for its superior camera system.
Personal Choice
If I were to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A52. While the Motorola Moto G71 5G has the benefit of having a more efficient chipset and battery, I value the overall user experience more, and the Samsung A52 simply provides a better experience due to its better display, cameras, audio, and more software support. The 90Hz display is a substantial upgrade, making daily interactions feel more fluid and enjoyable and while the camera on the Motorola is decent, it lacks some important features such as OIS and 4K video which makes a big difference.
