1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G55 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 161.6 × 73.8 × 8.1 mm | Moto G55 is slightly taller and thinner, while the A52 is a bit wider. The differences are marginal and unlikely to significantly affect handling. |
| Weight | 189g | 179g | Moto G55 is slightly lighter, which might be noticeable during long periods of usage. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.49" | Negligible size difference. Both phones offer a similar screen experience. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Identical resolution means comparable sharpness and detail. |
| PPI | 407 | 405 | Very similar pixel density, making it difficult to perceive any difference in sharpness. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, making the A52's display noticeably better for media consumption and viewing under different lighting conditions. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Moto G55 offers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall perceived responsiveness of the phone. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Brightness is the same on both phones, however, 0 nits is an unusual value and likely incorrect, assuming that the phones would have some maximum brightness levels. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Moto G55's chipset is newer and generally faster, leading to quicker app launches and smoother multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 470,000 | Moto G55 demonstrates significantly better performance in benchmarks, which translates to a snappier user experience in day-to-day tasks and gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | IMG BXM-8-256 | Different GPU, benchmarks suggest that the Moto G55 performs slightly better in gaming and graphical tasks. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" | 50MP, f/1.8 | A52 has a higher resolution main camera and a larger sensor size potentially capturing more detail and performing slightly better in low light. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" | 16MP, f/2.4 | A52 has a significantly higher resolution and wider aperture, likely resulting in better selfie image quality, especially in low-light conditions. |
| Wide-Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | A52 has a higher resolution wide-angle lens, which could translate to slightly better wide-angle shots. |
| Portrait Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A52 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode photos, offering better background blur effects, while the Moto G55 doesn't offer this feature. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A52 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up photos, while the Moto G55 doesn't offer this feature. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps | Up to 1080p@60fps | A52 offers higher-resolution 4K video recording, which may be important for users wanting the highest quality footage. The Moto G55, however, can record at 60fps at 1080p. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G55 has a larger battery, which is likely to result in longer battery life, potentially making it last a day for most users. |
| Charging | 25W | 30W | Moto G55 has slightly faster charging, which will reduce the time spent plugged in to an outlet. |
| Features | Non-removable, QC2.0 and AFC | Reverse charging, Non-removable | A52 has fast-charging protocols but Moto G55 has a reverse charging function. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | Moto G55 comes with a newer OS version out of the box; the A52 can be upgraded to Android 14. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi MiMO | Both phones support similar WiFi standards; Motorola Moto G55 additionally supports: Wi-Fi MiMO |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+ | 5.3, A2DP, LE, APT-x, LDAC, AAC | Moto G55 has newer Bluetooth version with better audio codecs (APT-x, LDAC, AAC) for superior audio streaming quality. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1) | Moto G55 supports more satellite systems leading to higher location accuracy. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM + eSIM | Moto G55 can use an eSIM to connect to multiple carriers |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256GB | 128/256GB | Both offer similar storage options |
| RAM | 4/6/8GB | 8GB | Moto G55 has 8GB of RAM, for improved multitasking |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither device offers expandable storage |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | A52 offers slightly enhanced spatial and surround sound, while the Moto G55 features two microphones for improved sound quality during calls. |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Moto G55 has a side mounted fingerprint sensor which is generally faster and more reliable than the in-display sensor on the A52. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Both devices are well protected with the same screen technology. |
| Sensors | |||
| Features | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass | The A52 has a Gyroscope, while the Moto G55 has a compass. Both have a similar number of sensors overall. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED technology provides better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors than the Moto G55's IPS LCD. This makes for a more enjoyable viewing experience, especially for media consumption.
- Better Camera System: Offers a higher-resolution main camera, selfie camera, and wide-angle lens. It also includes dedicated portrait and macro lenses, providing more versatility and options for photography.
- Higher Video Resolution: Supports 4K video recording, whereas the Moto G55 is limited to 1080p. This could be crucial for users needing the highest quality video footage.
- Audio: Offers slightly enhanced spatial and surround sound
- Gyroscope Sensor: Provides better motion tracking for gaming and AR applications.
Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:
- Newer and Faster Chipset: The Mediatek Dimensity 7025 offers better overall performance, leading to smoother app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
- Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother and more responsive display experience compared to the A52's 90Hz, making scrolling feel more fluid.
- Larger Battery: A 5000mAh battery coupled with a more efficient chipset provides better battery life and endurance.
- Faster Charging: 30W fast charging reduces the time it takes to recharge the device.
- Newer Bluetooth Version: Bluetooth 5.3 offers improved audio quality with support for codecs like APT-x, LDAC, and AAC, leading to a better wireless listening experience.
- More Advanced GPS: Supports more satellite systems for improved location accuracy.
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: More advanced and reliable compared to basic sensors.
- eSIM Support: Allows for digital carrier switching, adding convenience and flexibility for international travel or managing multiple phone lines.
- Reverse charging: Convenient feature for charging other devices.
- More RAM: Comes with 8GB of RAM
Significant Trade-offs:
- The A52's main trade-off is its older chipset, making it slightly slower than the Moto G55.
- The Moto G55's trade-off is its IPS LCD panel which does not offer the same level of contrast and color vibrancy as the A52's AMOLED. The camera system is also less versatile compared to the A52.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 is Ideal For:
- Media Enthusiasts: Those who prioritize high-quality displays for watching videos, movies, and browsing photos will benefit from the AMOLED display.
- Photography Lovers: Users who value versatile camera systems with multiple lenses and higher resolution sensors will appreciate the options provided by the A52.
- Casual Gamers: Users who game casually but still appreciate better motion tracking can use the A52.
Motorola Moto G55 is Ideal For:
- Power Users: Users who need a fast phone for intensive tasks, heavy multitasking, and gaming on the go.
- Battery Life Seekers: Users who prioritize long battery life to make it through the day without worrying about recharging.
- Audio Lovers: Users who want the highest quality audio streaming experience over wireless headphones.
- International Travelers: Users who frequently travel and need an eSIM for convenient carrier switching.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Display Preference: Do you prioritize superior contrast and color accuracy (AMOLED on A52), or a smoother scrolling experience (120Hz on Moto G55)?
- Performance Needs: Do you need a powerful processor for heavy gaming and multitasking (Moto G55), or is a mid-range processor adequate (A52)?
- Camera Versatility: Do you value a versatile camera system with multiple lenses and higher resolution (A52), or is a standard dual camera setup sufficient (Moto G55)?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Frequent Traveler & Power User: Choose the Motorola Moto G55. Its eSIM support, fast performance, and long battery life make it ideal for people on the go.
- Scenario 2: Photography and Media Buff: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. Its superior AMOLED display and versatile camera system make it perfect for users who enjoy taking photos and consuming content.
- Scenario 3: Budget-Conscious User Needing Smooth Performance: Choose the Motorola Moto G55. It offers better performance and a smoother display for a more modern user experience.
Personal Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would lean towards the Motorola Moto G55.
Reasons:
- Performance: As a daily user who often multitasks and engages in some mobile gaming, the newer, faster chipset and the higher refresh rate make the Moto G55 the better choice. The Antutu score and the chipset advantage can be noticed during usage.
- Battery Life: The bigger battery and fast charging capabilities is an important factor for me as I tend to use my phone for extended periods. The extra battery life would give peace of mind throughout the day.
- eSIM: As a frequent traveler, the eSIM support is very convenient for managing multiple phone plans and carrier switching without physical SIM cards.
- Modern Features: The side mounted fingerprint sensor and Bluetooth 5.3 are nice additions that the Moto G55 has that make it the more modern device of the two.
While the Samsung A52 has a better display and more versatile camera system, for my personal use case, the performance, battery, and newer features on the Moto G55 edge it out slightly. The overall practical user experience of the G55, particularly in performance, is more relevant to my daily activities.
