1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G52 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 160.1 × 74.5 × 8 mm | Similar size, A52 is slightly thicker but has same height (159.9 mm), and width (75.1 mm). |
| Weight | 189g | 169g | Moto G52 is 20g lighter, making it more comfortable for extended one-handed use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Negligible difference in screen size; both are suitable for media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both provide the same level of detail; sharp, clear images and text. |
| PPI | 407 | 402 | Both have similar pixel density; virtually indistinguishable in sharpness. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Rich colors and deep blacks; excellent for media consumption and general use. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Smoother scrolling and animations; improves the overall user experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Brightness information is unavailable, both peak at 0 nits |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Snapdragon 720G offers better performance for demanding apps and gaming. The 680 is more energy efficient. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 216,000 | A52 has significantly better performance, leading to smoother multitasking and gaming experiences. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 610 | A52's GPU is more powerful, leading to better graphical performance in games and apps. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Resolution | 64MP | 50MP | A52 captures more detailed images. |
| Main Camera Sensor Size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.76" | A52's larger sensor allows better light capture, leading to better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 32MP | 16MP | A52 captures more detailed selfies. |
| Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.45 | A52 allows more light to enter, improving low-light selfies. |
| Wide Angle Camera | 12MP | 8MP | A52 has a slightly higher resolution for wide-angle shots. |
| Portrait Mode | Yes | No | A52 offers a dedicated depth camera for portrait mode. |
| Macro Camera | 5MP | 2MP | A52 captures more detailed macro shots. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | A52 allows higher resolution videos; G52 doesn't support stabilization |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G52 has a larger battery and can potentially last longer on a single charge. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer | 30W Fast Charging, Li-Ion | Moto G52 charges slightly faster; A52 has QC2.0 and AFC support. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to 14 | Android 12 | Moto G52 has a newer OS out of the box but lacks max version info. A52 has guaranteed upgrades to android 14. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 128GB or 256 GB | 64GB or 128GB or 256GB | Both have the same maximum capacity of 256GB. A52 has fewer options. |
| RAM | 4GB, 6GB or 8GB | 4GB or 6GB | A52 has a higher RAM option of 8GB, which improves multitasking and gaming. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers the option to expand storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | A52 offers more advanced audio features for a slight edge in audio experience, the G52 features a 2-mic system for clarity. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Basic Sensor | Side-mounted Sensor | Moto G52 uses a more convenient and faster side-mounted fingerprint sensor. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Similar standards | Similar standards | A52 has dual band and Wi-Fi Display support, which may improve Wi-Fi performance and connectivity. |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 LE | Bluetooth 5.0 LE | Moto G52 has more Bluetooth profiles support, enhancing connectivity with more devices. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | A52 supports Beidou, G52 supports SUPL; Both have similar overall performance. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Similar protection from scratches and minor drops. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | G52 has a compass, A52 has hall and geomagnetic sensors, both have different advantages. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset and Adreno 618 GPU offer better processing and graphics capabilities, suitable for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
- Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution main, selfie, wide, and macro cameras, plus a dedicated portrait lens, provide more versatile photography and videography options.
- Better Video Recording: 4K video recording with EIS, providing higher quality videos.
- More RAM Options: Up to 8GB of RAM, leading to better multitasking.
- Enhanced Audio: Features such as Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo speakers offering superior audio immersion.
- Future proof software support: The device is upgradable to Android 14, giving more life to the phone.
- More Wi-Fi features: supports Dual-band and Wi-Fi display for more flexibility and connectivity.
Motorola Moto G52 Advantages:
- Lighter and Slimmer: More comfortable for extended use.
- Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life due to a larger capacity.
- Faster Charging: 30W charging is slightly faster.
- Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient and faster unlocking.
- More Bluetooth profiles support: Enhance connectivity with more devices, better for listening to music with wireless devices.
- Newer OS Out of Box: Comes with android 12, although the maximum version is not mentioned.
- Potentially Cheaper: May be more budget-friendly depending on pricing.
Trade-offs:
- A52: Heavier and thicker, also has a lower capacity battery.
- G52: Lower performing chipset and GPU, a less versatile camera system, with no portrait camera.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Power users who demand performance, gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who need a versatile camera.
- Use Cases:
- Playing graphics-intensive mobile games.
- Capturing high-quality photos and videos in different scenarios.
- Multitasking with demanding apps.
- Viewing high-resolution content, such as YouTube videos or streaming movies.
- Listening to High fidelity audio
Motorola Moto G52:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize battery life, comfort, and affordability, with typical usage patterns.
- Use Cases:
- Everyday tasks such as browsing, social media, and messaging.
- Casual photography and video recording.
- Extended use without frequent charging.
- People who prefer lighter phones.
- Users looking for a reliable, good value device.
Price-to-Value Ratio: The Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a better price-to-value ratio for users who value performance and camera versatility, while the Motorola Moto G52 offers better value for users who want a budget-friendly phone with great battery life, and a comfortable design.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- Performance vs. Battery Life: Do you prioritize smooth performance and a better camera system, or longer battery life and comfortable ergonomics?
- Camera Needs: Are you a heavy mobile photographer or just need a reliable camera for casual use?
- Budget: Are you willing to spend more for a superior all-around experience, or do you need a more affordable option?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- If you need the best performance and camera: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.
- If you want the longest battery life and a comfortable design: Choose the Motorola Moto G52.
- If you want a balance: The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better performing chipset but a smaller battery, the Motorola Moto G52 is lighter and has a bigger battery.
Personal Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would opt for the Samsung Galaxy A52. While the Moto G52 has a larger battery and is lighter, the superior performance of the Snapdragon 720G, coupled with the significantly better camera system of the A52 makes it a more compelling option for my needs. As someone who frequently uses their phone for media consumption, gaming, and photography, the A52's advantages in these areas are significant. The better video recording capabilities and future proofing, with guaranteed android 14 updates, also make it a better long-term investment despite being older than the G52. While the lighter weight and longer battery life of the G52 are desirable, I find the A52's overall feature set and performance to be more aligned with my priorities.
