1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G24 Power | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 163.5 × 74.5 × 9 mm | The Moto G24 Power is slightly taller and thicker, potentially feeling bulkier in hand. |
| Weight | 189g | 197g | The Galaxy A52 is slightly lighter, which may be more comfortable for extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.56" | Virtually identical screen sizes; negligible difference. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | The Galaxy A52's display is significantly sharper, making text and images clearer. |
| PPI | 407 | 269 | The Galaxy A52 provides much crisper visuals, particularly for detailed content. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | The Galaxy A52 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 500 nits | The Moto G24 Power is significantly brighter, enhancing outdoor visibility in sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | The Galaxy A52 offers slightly better performance for everyday tasks and gaming. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 266,894 | The Galaxy A52 will load apps and perform tasks faster. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G52 MC2 | The Galaxy A52 is expected to handle graphically intensive tasks slightly better. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 6000mAh | The Moto G24 Power has a much larger battery, potentially lasting significantly longer between charges. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 33W fast charging | The Moto G24 Power charges faster. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Main Camera | 64MP f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm | 50MP f/1.8, 0.64µm | The Galaxy A52 has higher resolution. |
| Front Camera | 32MP f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8MP f/2.0, 1.12µm | The Galaxy A52 takes much higher-resolution selfies. The Moto G24 Power's wider aperture allows more light. |
| Wide Angle Camera | 12MP f/2.2 | 2MP f/2.4 | The Galaxy A52 has a higher resolution ultrawide camera. |
| Portrait Mode | 5MP f/2.4 | None | The Galaxy A52 offers a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait shots |
| Macro Camera | 5MP f/2.4 | 2MP f/2.4 | The Galaxy A52 offers higher resolution in macro mode. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps (with EIS) | 1080p@30fps | The Galaxy A52 can record higher-resolution videos with smoother capture and better video stabilization. |
| Camera Features | OIS, Night Mode, 4K Video | PDAF, RAW | The Galaxy A52 has Optical Image Stabilization and Night Mode. The G24 Power has Phase Detection Autofocus and RAW. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | The Moto G24 Power has a newer OS out of the box. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Both have similar Wi-Fi capabilities, the Galaxy A52 adds support for Wi-Fi Display. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 LE | 5.0 LE | Both have similar Bluetooth capabilities, the Galaxy A52 adds support for ANT+. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | The G24 Power supports SUPL for improved location. |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Both offer dual SIM support. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB or 256 GB | - | The A52 offers up to 256GB storage |
| RAM | 4 GB or 6 GB or 8 GB | - | The A52 offers up to 8GB RAM |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither supports expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | The Galaxy A52 offers slightly better audio with Dolby Digital Plus. |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | The side-mounted fingerprint sensor on the Moto G24 Power is generally more convenient. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | The Galaxy A52 offers better screen protection. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | The G24 Power includes a Compass, the A52 also offers a Hall and Geomagnetic sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: The AMOLED display with higher resolution and pixel density offers significantly better image quality, colors, and clarity than the Moto G24 Power's LCD.
- Better Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset and higher AnTuTu scores indicate smoother multitasking and gaming performance.
- Enhanced Camera System: The Galaxy A52 has a much more versatile camera setup, with higher resolutions across all lenses, OIS, 4K video recording, and a dedicated portrait lens, leading to more detailed and high-quality photos and videos.
- Better Audio Features: With Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital Plus, it offers a superior audio experience.
- Better Build Quality: The use of Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides enhanced screen protection.
- More Storage and RAM Options: The A52 offers more storage and RAM variations, giving more choices based on user needs.
Motorola Moto G24 Power Advantages:
- Significantly Larger Battery: The 6000mAh battery offers substantially longer battery life, ideal for users who need their phone to last all day (or multiple days) without recharging.
- Faster Charging: The 33W charging capability allows for quicker battery top-ups compared to the 25W charging of the Galaxy A52.
- Brighter Display: The screen has a much higher brightness, making it easier to view in direct sunlight.
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 14 out of the box.
- Practical Features: Supports a compass and offers RAW shooting mode.
Trade-offs:
- The Galaxy A52 offers better display, performance, and camera capabilities but may require more frequent charging.
- The Moto G24 Power has better battery life, faster charging, and higher brightness but lags behind in display quality, processing power and camera features.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize high-quality visuals, gaming performance, and superior camera capabilities. Good for content creators, social media enthusiasts, or anyone who values a vibrant and detailed display.
- Specific Use Cases:
- High-quality media consumption: Enjoying movies, videos, and games on a vivid, sharp display.
- Photography and videography: Taking detailed photos and videos for social media or personal use.
- Mobile gaming: Playing graphically intensive games with smoother performance.
- Multitasking: Running multiple apps smoothly due to greater processing power.
Motorola Moto G24 Power:
- Ideal User: Users who need long battery life, a reliable phone for outdoor use and don't prioritize top-tier display or camera performance.
- Specific Use Cases:
- Extended travel or outdoor activities: Staying connected without worrying about frequent charging.
- Work or essential communication: Using the phone for calls, messages, and basic tasks throughout the day.
- Users who need a basic but reliable phone: Not focused on intensive use but need the device to last a long time.
- Users who frequently use the phone in bright sunlight: The higher brightness display will be more easily visible.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality to you? (Do you prioritize a vibrant, sharp screen for media consumption or is a basic display sufficient?)
- Do you need a battery that will last you more than a day, or can you manage with a standard battery? (Will you have easy access to charging or do you often find yourself away from a power source?)
- How important are advanced camera features to you? (Do you take a lot of photos and videos, or are basic camera capabilities enough?)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Media Enthusiast: If you frequently watch videos, play games, or value a great display experience, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is the better choice.
- Scenario 2: Outdoor User: If you need a phone that can last all day (or more) without charging, and you're often in bright conditions, the Motorola Moto G24 Power will serve you better.
- Scenario 3: Casual User: If you just need a reliable phone for basic tasks and prefer a newer OS, the Motorola Moto G24 Power is a solid choice.
Personal Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. While the Motorola G24 Power's battery life is undeniably appealing, the overall experience of using the A52 is much better.
The significantly better display quality, more powerful processor, and superior camera capabilities are very important for my typical usage. I frequently consume media, play games, and often rely on my phone's camera. While the battery might require more frequent charging, the overall advantages of the A52 outweigh this drawback. I would also prefer the build quality of the A52 with a gorilla glass 5 screen.
Ultimately, the "better" phone depends on individual priorities, and if battery life is paramount, the Moto G24 Power is a strong choice. However, for a more well-rounded experience and a higher level of performance in the most important areas, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A52.
