Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs. Motorola Moto G24
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2021-03-26 | 2024-02-06 | The Moto G24 is a newer phone, potentially offering more up-to-date software. |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm | Moto G24 is taller but thinner; A52 slightly wider but thicker. Impact on grip and pocketability is minimal for most users. |
| Weight | 189g | 181g | Moto G24 is slightly lighter, which may be noticeable during extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.56" | Nearly identical screen size; Negligible difference. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | Samsung A52 has a significantly sharper and clearer display. Text and images will appear more crisp. |
| PPI | 407 | 269 | A52 will have a much more detailed and visually appealing screen compared to Moto G24. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A52 has better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors which provide a better viewing experience. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits (spec error) | 500 nits | Moto G24's higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight. A52's brightness spec is missing and could be an important consideration |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | A52's chip is slightly faster, leading to better app loading and smoother UI. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 266,894 | A52 has superior benchmark scores which translates to snappier performance. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G52 MC2 | A52's GPU offers better performance, specifically for gaming and graphics intensive apps. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G24 offers longer battery life for daily use. |
| Charging | 25W | 15W | A52 charges faster, reducing downtime. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 0.64µm | A52 main sensor has higher resolution and potentially better image quality in good light. Moto G24's sensor details are limited. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.8µm | 8MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm | A52's front camera offers a significant boost in resolution for high-quality selfies. Moto G24 has a wider aperture, beneficial for low light. |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 offers much higher resolution and a slightly wider aperture for wide-angle shots. Moto G24's wide angle is very basic. |
| Portrait (Depth) | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A52 provides better depth sensing for portrait photos; G24 lacks a dedicated depth sensor. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 provides higher resolution for capturing more detail in macro shots. |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS, Yes, Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fps | 1080p@30fps, No, Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fps | A52 can record sharper video with higher resolution, and has video stabilization for smoother capture. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | Moto G24 has newer operating system out of the box. A52 will receive upgrades up to Android 14, but Moto G24 may have a longer software support life. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band, Hotspot, Direct, Wi-Fi Display | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band, Hotspot, Direct | Both have similar Wi-Fi connectivity with A52 having additional Wi-Fi Display feature. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+ | 5.0 LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE | Both offer standard Bluetooth 5.0 capabilities; A52 has the ANT+ feature. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Both phones provide similar GPS performance with G24 having SUPL. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 128/256 GB | 128/256 GB | Both have similar storage options. |
| RAM | 4/6/8 GB | 4/8 GB | Both have adequate RAM options for multitasking and gaming. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Both phones do not support expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | A52 provides a richer audio experience with Dolby Digital Plus. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Moto G24 features a more convenient, modern side mounted fingerprint sensor for enhanced security. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | A52 offers better screen protection with Gorilla Glass. Moto G24's screen protection is not specified. |
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | G24 has a compass for navigation, while A52 has Hall and Geomagnetic sensors. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED panel with higher resolution and pixel density offers a significantly better viewing experience with vibrant colors and sharper images.
- Better Performance: Faster Snapdragon 720G chipset and GPU leads to smoother app loading, multitasking, and gaming performance.
- Better Cameras: Higher resolution main, selfie, wide-angle, macro and depth cameras, plus 4K video recording, all offer a significant step up in image and video quality, including OIS.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging reduces downtime compared to the Moto G24's 15W.
- More Advanced Features: Better audio with Dolby Digital Plus, more advanced connectivity like ANT+ and Wi-Fi display
Motorola Moto G24 Advantages:
- Newer Phone: Launched almost 3 years later, it has a more recent Android version (Android 14).
- Larger Battery: 500mAh larger battery providing better battery life for extended usage.
- Brighter Display: 500 nits brightness offers better sunlight visibility.
- Lighter Build: Slightly lighter, which some might find more comfortable for prolonged usage.
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: More convenient access and modern design.
- Compass Sensor: Built-in compass for navigation.
Trade-offs:
- The A52 trades battery life and weight for a superior display, performance and camera.
- The G24 trades camera and performance for better battery life and a more recent Android.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize display quality, camera performance, and faster charging.
- Use Cases: Ideal for:
- Multimedia consumption (watching videos, browsing photos).
- Social media users who share high-quality photos and videos.
- Users who play mobile games and require smooth performance.
- Users who take selfies and require high resolution images and videos.
- Price-to-Value: Still represents good value for those seeking a premium display and camera at a reasonable price, however due to its age, might be harder to find in new condition.
Motorola Moto G24:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize battery life, a newer Android OS and good outdoor visibility while being more budget-conscious.
- Use Cases: Ideal for:
- Users who require extended battery life and spend long hours away from a charger.
- General users focused on reliability, ease of use and modern security.
- Users who frequently use their phone in bright outdoor environments.
- Price-to-Value: Offers a good balance between cost and performance with the newer Android OS, making it a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious buyers.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- How important is display quality? If vibrant colors, high resolution, and crispness are essential, the A52 is the better choice. If you prioritize screen brightness and are willing to sacrifice display quality for a lower price and newer software, then the G24 will be sufficient.
- How important is the camera? If taking high quality photos and videos is important, especially 4k quality, the A52 will be the better choice. If you take occasional photos, then the G24 will be sufficient.
- How much do you value battery life versus charging speed? If having a long-lasting battery is paramount, choose the G24. If you prefer faster charging, choose the A52.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (Media Enthusiast): If you frequently watch videos, browse photos, and play games, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is recommended for its superior display and performance.
- Scenario 2 (Power User): If you prioritize extended battery life and a more recent version of Android without spending too much, the Motorola Moto G24 is the better option.
- Scenario 3 (Outdoor User): If you use the phone frequently outside in bright sunlight, the Motorola Moto G24 is better suited due to its 500 nits of brightness.
- Scenario 4 (Social Media & Camera): If you tend to take lots of photos and videos, especially selfies, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is the obvious pick because of its much more robust camera setup.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would select the Samsung Galaxy A52. While it is an older phone, its strengths in display quality, performance and camera capabilities are just more important to me personally, than having the latest version of Android and a bigger battery. My typical usage would definitely benefit more from having a superior viewing experience, better performance and a great camera system, despite the fact that it's not the newest device. While the G24 is a newer phone with a more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor and a bigger battery, those features do not outweigh the advantages provided by the A52 for my own particular usage habits. However, for someone who prioritizes battery life, sunlight visibility and a more recent Android OS, then the G24 would be a better choice.
