1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Moto G04s, focusing on their practical implications:
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G04s | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm | The Moto G04s is slightly taller and thinner, while the A52 is a bit wider and thicker. |
| Weight | 189g | 178.8g | The Moto G04s is slightly lighter, which may be more comfortable for prolonged use. |
| Build | Plastic back, Gorilla Glass 5 | Plastic back, Gorilla Glass 3 | A52 offers better screen protection against scratches and damage, while both have plastic back for weight reduction. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G04s | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.56" | Virtually identical screen sizes; negligible difference for most users. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | The A52 has a much sharper display; text and images will be noticeably clearer. |
| PPI | 407 | 269 | The A52 provides a significantly clearer picture and more detail. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | The A52's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, better for multimedia consumption and outdoor visibility. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness is identical at 0 nits, limiting outdoor visibility under direct sunlight. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G04s | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | The A52's Snapdragon is more powerful, offering better performance for gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 220,000 | The A52 delivers a noticeably smoother and faster user experience; more suitable for demanding tasks. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MP1 | The A52 has a superior GPU, providing better graphics performance for gaming and GPU-intensive tasks. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G04s | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN1, 1.0µm | The A52 has a higher resolution sensor and larger sensor size which could result in better low-light photos and more details; the Moto G04s larger pixels could aid in low light photos too. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.8µm | 5MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | The A52 takes significantly higher-resolution selfies, better for social media and video calls. |
| Wide-Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | Not Available | The A52 can capture wider scenes, good for landscapes and group photos. |
| Depth Sensor | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | The A52 can create better background blur for portrait photos. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | The A52 can take close-up photos with more detail. |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, EIS | 1080p@30fps | The A52 can record higher resolution video; better for capturing sharp videos. |
| Features | 4K Video, Digital zoom, Quadruple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous autofocus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night Mode | Digital zoom, Optical zoom, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Autofocus, Touch focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Laser autofocus (LAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer | The A52 offers advanced features for video shooting; both offer similar photo capturing features. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G04s | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | The Moto G04s has a larger battery, likely offering longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 15W Fast Charging | The A52 charges faster, reducing the time it takes to replenish battery power. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages
- Superior Display: AMOLED, higher resolution, and higher pixel density provide a much better viewing experience with vibrant colors, clarity, and better outdoor visibility.
- Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 720G offers faster processing, better multitasking, and smoother gaming performance.
- More Versatile Camera System: Includes wide-angle, depth, and macro lenses; high-resolution selfie camera, and 4K video recording.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging reduces the downtime for charging.
- Software Support: Offers future software upgrades, up to Android 14.
- Advanced Audio Features: Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers.
Motorola Moto G04s Advantages
- Longer Battery Life: A larger 5000mAh battery means less frequent charging for users who prioritize battery endurance.
- More Recent Software: Comes with Android 14 out of the box.
- Lighter Weight: Easier to hold and handle for extended periods.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Considered more convenient for some users.
Significant Trade-offs
- A52: Lower battery capacity, slightly heavier.
- G04s: Lower display quality, significantly less performance, basic camera features.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52:
Ideal User:
- Multimedia consumers who watch videos and movies.
- Gamers who play graphically intensive games.
- Social media users who value high-quality photos and videos.
- Users who prioritize smooth performance, better multitasking, and faster app loading.
- Users that appreciate quality audio.
Use Cases:
- Streaming content (Netflix, YouTube) with vibrant display.
- Playing games with smooth graphics and frame rates.
- Taking detailed photos and videos for social media.
- Productivity and multitasking with multiple apps open.
- Video calls and recordings.
Motorola Moto G04s:
- Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize battery life above all else.
- Budget-conscious buyers looking for a basic smartphone for everyday use.
- Users who mostly use their phones for calls, text, browsing, and simple tasks.
- Users that prioritize ergonomics over performance.
- Use Cases:
- Daily web browsing and social media scrolling.
- Longer use throughout the day without needing to recharge.
- Basic photo and video needs.
- Casual gaming.
- Simple everyday tasks.
4. Decision Framework
Here are three key questions for buyers to consider, along with scenario-based recommendations:
- How important is display quality and performance to you?
- Scenario 1: If you watch a lot of videos, play games, or want a vibrant and sharp display, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is the better choice.
- Scenario 2: If display quality is not your priority and you just need basic functionality, the Motorola Moto G04s is acceptable.
- Do you need versatile camera features?
- Scenario 1: If you need a wide range of camera capabilities (wide-angle, macro, depth) and want high-resolution selfies, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is significantly better.
- Scenario 2: If you have basic camera needs, the Motorola Moto G04s will suffice.
- Is battery life a priority?
- Scenario 1: If you need all-day battery life without needing to recharge often, the Motorola Moto G04s is better.
- Scenario 2: If you don't mind charging more frequently, the Samsung Galaxy A52's faster charging makes it acceptable.
Final Decision
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.
While the Motorola Moto G04s offers a larger battery and a more recent operating system version, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is superior in almost every other critical aspect: display quality, performance, and camera versatility. The AMOLED screen of the A52 is a game-changer, offering a much more enjoyable viewing experience, and the Snapdragon 720G provides a significantly better user experience. For my personal needs and based on the provided spec, the advantages of the Galaxy A52 outweigh the slightly better battery life of the Moto G04s. The ability to take high quality photos and videos, combined with the superior performance, make it the more suitable phone for my usage pattern. I am willing to trade a slight decrease in battery life for better performance, higher quality pictures and a great screen.
