1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 162.6 × 74.8 × 8.3 mm | Motorola slightly taller and thinner; A52 a bit wider. Differences are minor and unlikely noticeable. |
| Weight | 189g | 190g | Both phones feel very similar in hand. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.7" | Motorola's larger display provides more screen real estate for content consumption and multitasking. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both phones offer the same sharpness and clarity. |
| PPI | 407 | 395 | Almost identical pixel density; both will appear equally sharp. |
| Technology | AMOLED | P-OLED | Both offer vibrant colors and good contrast. AMOLED slightly better for deep blacks |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Motorola's 120Hz display offers smoother scrolling and animations, making it feel more responsive. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1200 nits | Motorola's display is significantly brighter, providing much better visibility in direct sunlight. Samsung's brightness is unknown, so its outdoor visibility is an unknown factor. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Motorola’s newer 4nm chip is more power-efficient and provides better overall performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 514,000 | Motorola is significantly faster for daily use, gaming, and app loading due to higher processing power. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 710 | Motorola has a newer GPU for better graphics performance, particularly in gaming. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony LYT-700C, 1.0µm | Motorola's larger sensor and larger pixel size often translate to better low-light performance despite lower resolution. Samsung's higher resolution may result in sharper images in good lighting. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.8µm | 32MP, f/2.45, 0.7µm, sensor model not specified | Samsung has a wider aperture for better low light selfies. |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | None | Samsung offers a dedicated wide-angle lens for capturing expansive scenes. |
| Depth | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | Samsung has a dedicated depth camera for enhanced portrait mode effects. |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | Samsung has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots. |
| Wide Angle + Macro | None | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | Motorola combines these functions into a single lens for versatility. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | Up to 4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps | Motorola offers 1080p video recording at 120 fps for smoother slow-motion. Both phones support 4K recording. |
| Features | Quad camera, OIS, Ultra stable video | Dual Camera, OIS, PDAF, Dual Capture | Samsung includes features like ultra-stable video, while Motorola boasts PDAF for faster focus and dual capture for simultaneously recording from front and back. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Motorola's larger battery will likely provide longer battery life, reducing the need for frequent charging. |
| Charging | 25W | 30W | Motorola charges slightly faster, minimizing downtime. |
| Features | Non-removable, QC2.0 and AFC | Non-removable, 15W wireless charging, Reverse Charging | Motorola offers more versatile charging options with wireless and reverse charging. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- More Versatile Camera System: Includes dedicated wide-angle, macro, and depth sensors, offering flexibility for different shooting scenarios.
- Wider Aperture Front Camera: Better for low-light selfies.
- Dolby Digital Plus audio: Offers potentially better audio quality for media consumption.
- Better screen protection: Uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5, while Motorola's protection is unknown.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Advantages:
- Significantly Better Performance: Newer, more powerful chipset results in faster performance for apps and gaming.
- Smoother Display: Higher 120Hz refresh rate offers a more fluid user experience.
- Superior Outdoor Visibility: Much brighter display is easier to see in bright sunlight.
- Larger Battery: Longer battery life between charges.
- Faster Charging: 30W wired charging and 15W wireless charging
- More Modern Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.1, and more precise GPS.
- eSIM Support: Provides flexibility for switching between carriers.
- Better slow-motion video: records in 1080p at 240 FPS, which is twice as many frames per second as the Samsung Galaxy A52's 120 FPS in the same resolution.
- Newer OS: Comes with Android 14, guaranteeing better updates.
Trade-offs:
- Samsung Galaxy A52 sacrifices performance, battery, display brightness, and modern connectivity for camera versatility.
- Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) trades the depth, macro, and wide angle lens for performance, display, and battery improvements.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal Users:
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize a more versatile camera system with dedicated macro and wide-angle lenses.
- Users Who Value Audio: Users who watch a lot of movies or listen to music on their phones and like stereo sound.
Budget-Conscious Buyers: May appeal to those who are fine with older specs to save on the cost.
Specific Use Cases:
- Capturing diverse landscape and close-up shots
- Taking detailed portrait photos with depth effects
- Users who consume video and music.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Ideal Users:
- Performance-Focused Users: Those who need a fast phone for gaming, multitasking, and general use.
- Heavy Phone Users: Users who need long battery life.
- Outdoor Users: Those who use their phone in bright sunlight.
Users who prefer new devices: Those who want the most recent software, connectivity, and charging features.
Specific Use Cases:
- Gaming and other performance-intensive tasks.
- Long days away from a power outlet.
- Using the phone in bright outdoor conditions.
- Those who prioritize wireless charging.
- Users who need eSIM compatibility.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- How important is camera versatility vs. performance? If you need a wide array of lenses, the Samsung is better. If you prefer smooth performance, the Motorola is the better choice.
- How much do you value display quality? Motorola has a brighter screen and 120hz, while the Samsung screen is an unknown in brightness.
- What features do you need for daily use? Motorola has wireless charging, modern connectivity, and better battery life.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Casual User: If the user's priorities are a decent camera, good performance, a solid screen, and good battery, the Motorola G Stylus 5G (2024) is the better choice.
- Scenario 2: Avid Photographer: If having a good set of lenses is the priority, the Samsung is the better phone, with dedicated wide, macro and depth sensors, but sacrifices other areas of performance.
- Scenario 3: Gaming or Heavy Usage: For demanding users who prioritize performance and battery life the Motorola G Stylus 5G (2024) is the better choice with its upgraded chipset, larger battery and smoother 120Hz screen.
What I would choose and why!
I would choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). The significantly improved performance, brighter 120Hz display, larger battery, faster charging and modern connectivity are more valuable to me than the extra camera lenses on the Samsung. The larger battery and faster charging will keep me powered through long days, and the much brighter screen will improve usability in direct sunlight. While the Samsung has a more versatile camera, the better performance and other advantages of the Motorola make it a more well-rounded device for my needs. The inclusion of wireless and reverse charging are also convenient for a busy lifestyle.
