1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G (2022) | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 165.4 x 75.8 x 9.4 mm | Moto G is taller and thicker, potentially less comfortable in smaller hands/pockets. |
Weight | 189g | 204g | Samsung A52 is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.5" | Identical screen size. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | Samsung A52 offers a much sharper, more detailed image with significantly more pixels. |
Pixel Density | 407 PPI | 270 PPI | Samsung A52 provides a noticeably clearer and less pixelated display. |
Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Samsung A52's AMOLED display provides superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both provide a smooth scrolling experience. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones share the same peak brightness which is not specified. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) | Moto G has a newer chipset, while A52 provides similar performance for everyday tasks. |
AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 389,300 | Moto G has a higher benchmark score, suggesting slightly better overall performance. |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Different GPUs, meaning different graphic processing capabilities, but both handle day-to-day tasks well. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera Resolution | 64MP | 50MP | Samsung A52 has higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail in well-lit conditions. |
Main Camera Sensor Size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.76" | Samsung A52's larger sensor allows for better light capture and improved low-light performance. |
Selfie Camera Resolution | 32MP | 13MP | Samsung A52 offers significantly higher resolution for selfies. |
Wide-Angle Lens | Yes | No | Samsung A52 allows for wider field-of-view shots. |
Portrait Mode Lens | 5MP | 2MP | Samsung A52 has a higher resolution portrait lens. |
Macro Lens | 5MP | 2MP | Samsung A52 has a higher resolution macro lens. |
Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps (with EIS) | 1080p@30fps | Samsung A52 can capture higher resolution videos. |
Video Stabilisation | EIS | No | Samsung A52 features video stabilisation. |
Slow Motion | 120fps | No | Samsung A52 can record slow-motion videos. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life. |
Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 10W Fast Charging | Samsung A52 charges significantly faster. |
Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Ion | Different battery chemistries, but both are non-removable. |
Software & Connectivity | |||
Operating System | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 12 | Moto G has a slightly newer version of Android out of the box. |
WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both offer standard WiFi connectivity, but Samsung A52 also includes dual-band support. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 | Moto G has a slightly newer version of Bluetooth with additional profiles. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL | Samsung A52 offers support for more satellite systems, potentially better accuracy. |
SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Single SIM | Samsung A52 supports two SIM cards simultaneously. |
Storage | |||
Internal Storage | 128/256GB | 64GB | Samsung A52 offers much more storage. |
RAM | 4/6/8GB | 6GB | Samsung A52 has more RAM options. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone has expandable storage. |
Audio & Security | |||
Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Basic Audio | Samsung A52 has superior audio with richer sound and immersion. |
Fingerprint Sensor | Basic | Side-mounted | Moto G has a more accessible fingerprint sensor. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Samsung A52 has better screen protection against scratches and damage. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution and pixel density offers a vastly superior viewing experience (sharper, vibrant, better contrast).
- Better Cameras: Higher resolution sensors, larger main camera sensor, and the inclusion of a wide-angle lens, result in better photos and more versatile camera system.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the 10W on the Moto G.
- Dual SIM Support: Allows for use of two SIM cards.
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers provide a much better audio experience.
- Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides more protection from scratches and damage.
Motorola Moto G (2022) Advantages:
- Slightly Better Performance: Marginal advantage in benchmarks due to the newer Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset.
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery can potentially provide longer battery life, especially under moderate use.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Considered more convenient by some users.
- Newer OS Out of the Box: Comes with a newer version of Android.
- Slightly newer Bluetooth version: Supports newer Bluetooth profiles.
- Barometer Sensor: Includes a barometer for more environmental data.
Trade-offs:
- The Samsung Galaxy A52 sacrifices battery life and a slightly newer chipset for a superior display, camera system, and faster charging.
- The Motorola Moto G prioritizes battery life, a slightly newer chipset, and a more modern fingerprint sensor, but sacrifices a high-quality display, camera features, and fast charging.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal Users:
- Media Consumers: Users who prioritize a high-quality display for watching videos, browsing, and gaming.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera system with good image quality.
- Users who value speed: Those who prefer faster charging and more storage.
- Dual Sim Users: People who need to manage two phone numbers.
- Audiophiles: Users who prefer enhanced sound and spatial audio.
Use Cases:
- Watching movies and TV shows in high detail with vivid colors.
- Capturing high-quality photos and videos, including wide-angle shots.
- Playing graphic-intensive games with smooth visuals.
- Rapidly charging the phone and carrying it all day without having to worry about running out of battery.
- Listening to music with an enhanced sound experience.
Motorola Moto G (2022) Ideal Users:
- Budget-Conscious Users: Users who want a reliable phone with decent performance at a lower price point.
- Battery Life Seekers: Users who need a phone that can last all day on a single charge, without intensive use.
- Users who prefer a side mounted fingerprint reader Those who prefer that type of fingerprint reader.
- Users who prefer newer OS version: Those who prefer the latest Android version out of the box.
Use Cases:
- Daily tasks like browsing social media, checking emails, and making calls, without needing to recharge the device.
- Casual photography where image quality is not the primary concern.
- Users who prioritize battery life over display quality.
- Simple tasks that don't require high graphic performance.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality to you? (Crucial: Samsung A52, Less Important: Moto G)
- Do you need a versatile camera system or is basic photography sufficient? (Versatile Camera: Samsung A52, Basic Photography: Moto G)
- Is long battery life or fast charging more important to you? (Long Battery Life: Moto G, Fast Charging: Samsung A52)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Multimedia Lover: If you primarily use your phone for watching videos and consuming content, choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its superior AMOLED display.
- Scenario 2: Battery Focused User: If you need your phone to last all day without worrying about charging, choose the Motorola Moto G (2022) for its larger battery.
- Scenario 3: Budget Conscious User: If cost is your primary concern, the Motorola Moto G (2022) offers a cheaper alternative with a few tradeoffs.
- Scenario 4: Well Rounded Experience: If you want a superior screen, camera, and charging while maintaining a good battery, Samsung Galaxy A52 is the best option.
My Choice
If I had to choose, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A52. Although it is an older phone, the drastically superior display, camera quality, faster charging and overall user experience make it a far better option. While the Motorola Moto G (2022) provides a slightly newer chipset, and a potentially longer battery life, the significant trade-offs in display quality, camera versatility, and charging speed are too significant for my priorities. The Samsung Galaxy A52 caters to my needs as a media consumer and photography enthusiast better, while still providing a comfortable battery life that would meet my typical needs. The enhanced audio and screen protection are further reasons to choose this phone over the Moto G. In my opinion the benefits of the A52 far outweigh the additional costs.