Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Motorola Moto G (2022) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 May 19, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 117.85 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 189 g 204 g
Height 159.9 mm 165.4 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Moonlight Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 81.4 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 42.43 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Motorola Moto G (2022)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm165.4 x 75.8 x 9.4 mmMoto G is taller and thicker, potentially less comfortable in smaller hands/pockets.
Weight189g204gSamsung A52 is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.5"Identical screen size.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Samsung A52 offers a much sharper, more detailed image with significantly more pixels.
Pixel Density407 PPI270 PPISamsung A52 provides a noticeably clearer and less pixelated display.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDSamsung A52's AMOLED display provides superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth provide a smooth scrolling experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones share the same peak brightness which is not specified.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm)MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm)Moto G has a newer chipset, while A52 provides similar performance for everyday tasks.
AnTuTu Score341,212389,300Moto G has a higher benchmark score, suggesting slightly better overall performance.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G57 MC2Different GPUs, meaning different graphic processing capabilities, but both handle day-to-day tasks well.
Camera
Main Camera Resolution64MP50MPSamsung A52 has higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail in well-lit conditions.
Main Camera Sensor Size1/1.7"1/2.76"Samsung A52's larger sensor allows for better light capture and improved low-light performance.
Selfie Camera Resolution32MP13MPSamsung A52 offers significantly higher resolution for selfies.
Wide-Angle LensYesNoSamsung A52 allows for wider field-of-view shots.
Portrait Mode Lens5MP2MPSamsung A52 has a higher resolution portrait lens.
Macro Lens5MP2MPSamsung A52 has a higher resolution macro lens.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps (with EIS)1080p@30fpsSamsung A52 can capture higher resolution videos.
Video StabilisationEISNoSamsung A52 features video stabilisation.
Slow Motion120fpsNoSamsung A52 can record slow-motion videos.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMoto G has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life.
Charging25W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingSamsung A52 charges significantly faster.
Battery TypeLi-PolymerLi-IonDifferent battery chemistries, but both are non-removable.
Software & Connectivity
Operating SystemAndroid 11 (upgradable to 14)Android 12Moto G has a slightly newer version of Android out of the box.
WiFi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/acBoth offer standard WiFi connectivity, but Samsung A52 also includes dual-band support.
Bluetooth5.05.1Moto G has a slightly newer version of Bluetooth with additional profiles.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPLSamsung A52 offers support for more satellite systems, potentially better accuracy.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbySingle SIMSamsung A52 supports two SIM cards simultaneously.
Storage
Internal Storage128/256GB64GBSamsung A52 offers much more storage.
RAM4/6/8GB6GBSamsung A52 has more RAM options.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage.
Audio & Security
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersBasic AudioSamsung A52 has superior audio with richer sound and immersion.
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedMoto G has a more accessible fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownSamsung A52 has better screen protection against scratches and damage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution and pixel density offers a vastly superior viewing experience (sharper, vibrant, better contrast).
  • Better Cameras: Higher resolution sensors, larger main camera sensor, and the inclusion of a wide-angle lens, result in better photos and more versatile camera system.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the 10W on the Moto G.
  • Dual SIM Support: Allows for use of two SIM cards.
  • Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers provide a much better audio experience.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides more protection from scratches and damage.

Motorola Moto G (2022) Advantages:

  • Slightly Better Performance: Marginal advantage in benchmarks due to the newer Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset.
  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery can potentially provide longer battery life, especially under moderate use.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Considered more convenient by some users.
  • Newer OS Out of the Box: Comes with a newer version of Android.
  • Slightly newer Bluetooth version: Supports newer Bluetooth profiles.
  • Barometer Sensor: Includes a barometer for more environmental data.

Trade-offs:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A52 sacrifices battery life and a slightly newer chipset for a superior display, camera system, and faster charging.
  • The Motorola Moto G prioritizes battery life, a slightly newer chipset, and a more modern fingerprint sensor, but sacrifices a high-quality display, camera features, and fast charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal Users:

  • Media Consumers: Users who prioritize a high-quality display for watching videos, browsing, and gaming.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera system with good image quality.
  • Users who value speed: Those who prefer faster charging and more storage.
  • Dual Sim Users: People who need to manage two phone numbers.
  • Audiophiles: Users who prefer enhanced sound and spatial audio.

Use Cases:

  • Watching movies and TV shows in high detail with vivid colors.
  • Capturing high-quality photos and videos, including wide-angle shots.
  • Playing graphic-intensive games with smooth visuals.
  • Rapidly charging the phone and carrying it all day without having to worry about running out of battery.
  • Listening to music with an enhanced sound experience.

Motorola Moto G (2022) Ideal Users:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Users who want a reliable phone with decent performance at a lower price point.
  • Battery Life Seekers: Users who need a phone that can last all day on a single charge, without intensive use.
  • Users who prefer a side mounted fingerprint reader Those who prefer that type of fingerprint reader.
  • Users who prefer newer OS version: Those who prefer the latest Android version out of the box.

Use Cases:

  • Daily tasks like browsing social media, checking emails, and making calls, without needing to recharge the device.
  • Casual photography where image quality is not the primary concern.
  • Users who prioritize battery life over display quality.
  • Simple tasks that don't require high graphic performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display quality to you? (Crucial: Samsung A52, Less Important: Moto G)
  2. Do you need a versatile camera system or is basic photography sufficient? (Versatile Camera: Samsung A52, Basic Photography: Moto G)
  3. Is long battery life or fast charging more important to you? (Long Battery Life: Moto G, Fast Charging: Samsung A52)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Multimedia Lover: If you primarily use your phone for watching videos and consuming content, choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 for its superior AMOLED display.
  • Scenario 2: Battery Focused User: If you need your phone to last all day without worrying about charging, choose the Motorola Moto G (2022) for its larger battery.
  • Scenario 3: Budget Conscious User: If cost is your primary concern, the Motorola Moto G (2022) offers a cheaper alternative with a few tradeoffs.
  • Scenario 4: Well Rounded Experience: If you want a superior screen, camera, and charging while maintaining a good battery, Samsung Galaxy A52 is the best option.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A52. Although it is an older phone, the drastically superior display, camera quality, faster charging and overall user experience make it a far better option. While the Motorola Moto G (2022) provides a slightly newer chipset, and a potentially longer battery life, the significant trade-offs in display quality, camera versatility, and charging speed are too significant for my priorities. The Samsung Galaxy A52 caters to my needs as a media consumer and photography enthusiast better, while still providing a comfortable battery life that would meet my typical needs. The enhanced audio and screen protection are further reasons to choose this phone over the Moto G. In my opinion the benefits of the A52 far outweigh the additional costs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.