1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, focusing on practical implications:
Design & Build
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 158.5 × 72 × 7.5 mm | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slimmer and more compact, potentially easier to handle. |
| Weight | 189g | 168g | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. |
| Build Quality | Gorilla Glass 5 Screen | Unknown screen protection | Samsung offers slightly better scratch and impact resistance (assuming the Edge 30 doesn't have it) |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.55" | Negligible difference; both provide ample screen real estate. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2400 | Identical sharpness; both provide crisp visuals. |
| PPI | 407 | 402 | Both have very similar pixel density, meaning virtually indistinguishable clarity. |
| Technology | AMOLED | P-OLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; P-OLED is similar to AMOLED |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 144Hz | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion offers significantly smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1100 nits | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has vastly superior outdoor visibility, significantly better for use in bright sunlight. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion offers much faster performance, suitable for demanding tasks like gaming. |
| AnTuTu Score | 341,212 | 904,900 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion offers significantly faster app loading and multitasking. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 660 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion handles graphically intensive games much better. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.55", 1.0µm | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's larger sensor and pixel size suggest better low-light performance, despite lower resolution. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32MP, f/2.2, 0.8µm | Both offer comparable selfie cameras |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | Both are similar, slight edge in resolution for the Motorola |
| Depth Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 2MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm | Samsung A52 offers slightly higher resolution, Motorola has larger pixel size in smaller sensor size |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | Samsung Galaxy A52 has an additional macro camera. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps, EIS; Slow-mo 120fps | Up to 8K@30fps, EIS, slow-mo 960fps | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion records much higher resolution videos, while the A52 has standard options. Motorola supports high frame rate slow motion |
| Camera Features | Quad camera, OIS, Ultra stable video, Continuous AF | Triple Camera, OIS, PDAF, LAF, RAW | Both have OIS, but Motorola's PDAF and RAW support is a plus, while the Samsung features a macro lens and a dedicated ultrawide mode. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4400mAh | Similar battery capacity, expect comparable battery life under similar use. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 68W Fast Charging | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion charges significantly faster, reducing downtime. |
| Features | QC2.0, AFC | None | Samsung Galaxy A52 has more charging features, but Motorola charges much faster |
Other | Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Practical Impact | |-----------------|--------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Software | Android 11 (up to 14) | Android 12 (up to 13) | Samsung offers a longer OS support, Motorola gets to enjoy newer features but less years of them. | | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has faster internet connection, better performance in crowded networks | | Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has newer Bluetooth, potentially more efficient and with better range. | | GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1) | Motorola has more precise location due to dual-band GPS and additional satellite systems | | RAM | 4/6/8GB | 8/12GB | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has more RAM making it better for multitasking | | Storage | 128/256 GB | 128/256 GB | Both devices offer the same storage options, neither one offers expandable storage via SD Card | | Audio | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Both feature Stereo Speakers and Dolby Atmos, Samsung has more immersive sound but no extra microphones | | Security | Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint Sensor | Both offer fingerprint security | Sensors | Hall, Geomagnetic | Compass | Both offer a variety of sensors, Samsung offers hall, Geomagnetic, Motorola a Compass |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion Advantages:
- Significantly faster performance: The Snapdragon 888+ offers vastly superior processing and graphics, making it better for gaming, heavy multitasking, and demanding applications.
- Superior Display: Higher 144Hz refresh rate offers smoother animations. The 1100 nits of brightness is also a considerable upgrade, especially when outdoors.
- Faster Charging: 68W charging is much faster than the 25W offered by Samsung A52, which is very convenient.
- Better video capabilities: 8K video recording is a great bonus for professional video use, and higher slow-mo capabilities.
- Newer connectivity: Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2 offer an improvement over the older version on the Samsung A52
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Macro Camera: Dedicated macro camera for detailed close-up shots.
- Longer OS Support: Samsung offers longer OS support, which means more features and more stable system for longer periods of time
- More Comprehensive Audio: Offers enhanced audio features like Dolby Digital Plus.
- More charging features: Although slower, Samsung offers more charging features like QC2.0 and AFC
- Better Screen Protection: Features Gorilla Glass 5.
Trade-offs:
- The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion sacrifices a macro camera and expandable storage for faster performance and superior screen, potentially limiting versatility.
- The Samsung Galaxy A52 provides a better camera system in terms of versatility, but lacks the faster performance and better display quality of the Motorola
- The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a more powerful chipset but has a shorter OS support
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 is Ideal For:
- Casual users: Users who want a balanced phone with a decent camera system.
- Macro Photography Enthusiasts: Those who enjoy taking close-up photos will benefit from the dedicated macro camera.
- Users with good knowledge in audio: Those who want enhanced spatial audio and surround sound, better separation and immersion
- Users with a longer term in mind: With better OS support, they can expect a stable system for a longer period of time
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is Ideal For:
- Power users: Gamers, multitaskers, and those who need a fast and responsive phone for demanding applications.
- Media consumers: Users who value smooth scrolling and enhanced video experience.
- Users who need faster charging: Those who prioritize quick charging will greatly benefit from 68W charging.
- Content Creators: Those who need high resolution videos and high frame rate slow motion recording.
4. Decision Framework
Here are three key questions buyers should consider:
- How important is performance for you? If you are a casual user, the Samsung A52 would be enough, but if you're planning on gaming, the Edge 30 Fusion is the better choice.
- Do you need a macro camera and enhanced audio? If you prioritize versatile cameras, the Samsung A52 is better, but if you don't use it too much, the Edge 30 Fusion's superior main camera and 8K video would be preferable.
- How do you value fast charging? If you are always in a hurry, or constantly using the phone, the Edge 30 Fusion is a better fit.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Casual daily use
- Recommendation: The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a good choice if you need a solid overall experience and a macro camera and better audio.
- Scenario 2: Gaming and performance focus
- Recommendation: The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion offers significantly better performance for gaming and demanding tasks with a superior display quality.
- Scenario 3: Content creation focus
- Recommendation: The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's ability to record videos in 8K makes it a great phone for video recording with its higher quality slow-motion recording capabilities
- Scenario 4: Budget is a limiting factor
- Recommendation: The Samsung Galaxy A52 should be the choice, as the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion tends to cost more
Personal Choice:
If I were to choose, I would choose the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The primary reasons are:
- Superior Performance: I value a fast and responsive device. The Snapdragon 888+ is a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 720G, which makes it much better for gaming and overall use.
- Enhanced Display: The 144Hz refresh rate and much higher brightness are very important for me, I am constantly using my phone indoors and outdoors, so a brighter display will make a considerable difference.
- Fast Charging: The 68W charging is a huge advantage, ensuring I spend less time plugged into the charger.
- Better Video Performance: Being able to record in 8K is a great bonus for professional use, while higher frame rate slow motion is also very interesting.
- Newer Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2 are better and more reliable.
While the Samsung Galaxy A52 has its merits, particularly in the audio and macro camera department, the significant performance and display advantages of the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion align better with my priorities. Although the Samsung A52 has a better software support in terms of years, I would not trade the better performance, screen and connectivity for more software updates.
