Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Google Pixel 9 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 August 22, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 189 g 198 g
Height 159.9 mm 152.8 mm
Width 75.1 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Wintergreen
  • Peony

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2424
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 422 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 14 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Google Pixel 9, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Google Pixel 9Practical Impact
Physical Size159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mmA52 is slightly larger, may be less comfortable for single-handed use. Pixel 9 is more compact.
Weight189g198gA52 is lighter by 9g. Difference is minimal, unlikely to be a major factor.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones, not foldable.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Google Pixel 9Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.3"A52 has a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption. Pixel 9 is more compact and easier to handle.
Resolution1080x24001080x2424Both are very similar, negligible difference in sharpness for most use cases.
Pixel Density (PPI)407422Pixel 9 is negligibly sharper, but not noticeable by most users
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Difference is minimal in practical use.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzPixel 9's 120Hz display will offer smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness, brightness is unspecified and cannot be accurately compared

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Google Pixel 9Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)Pixel 9's newer chip results in much faster performance, better efficiency, and future-proofing.
AnTuTu Score341,2121,071,616Pixel 9 is significantly faster for gaming, app loading, and multitasking
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G715 MC7Pixel 9's GPU offers better graphics performance for demanding tasks and gaming

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Google Pixel 9Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4700mAhPixel 9 has slightly more battery, which may translate to a bit longer runtime.
Charging25W fast charging27W fast chargingPixel 9 charges slightly faster.
FeaturesNon-removable, QC2.0 and AFCReverse charging, Non-removable, Wireless charging 15WPixel 9 supports wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. A52 does not, A52 has QC2.0 and AFC charging.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Google Pixel 9Practical Impact
Main Camera64MP f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.80µm50MP f/1.69, 1/1.3", 1.20µmPixel 9 captures more light with larger sensor and wider aperture, should perform better in low light; A52 has higher megapixel count, good for prints but not necessarily better photos.
Selfie Camera32MP f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.80µm10.5MP f/2.2A52 has higher-resolution selfie camera.
Wide Angle Lens12MP, f/2.2NoneA52 has a dedicated wide-angle lens
Portrait Mode Lens5MP, f/2.4NoneA52 has a dedicated depth sensor
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.4NoneA52 has a dedicated macro lens
Wide Angle + MacroNone48MP, f/1.7Pixel 9 combines wide and macro in a single lens
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS4K@60fps, 1080p@240fps, with OIS and EISPixel 9 offers a wide variety of video quality including better stabilization
DXOMark ScoreN/AMobile: 154 (Photo: 161, Video: 150)Pixel 9 has a high-rated camera based on DXOMark, A52 is not tested.
Camera FeaturesQuadruple camera, OIS, EISDual camera, OIS, EIS, Flicker sensor, Noise reduction, Pro Video Mode, LAF, PDAF, NPU AI Engine, RAWPixel 9 offers more advanced camera features, and processing, especially in video and low-light conditions

2. Key Differences Analysis

Advantages of Samsung Galaxy A52:

  • More Camera Lenses: Dedicated wide-angle, macro, and depth sensors provide flexibility in photography.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: May appeal to users who prioritize selfie detail.
  • Potentially Lower Price: As an older model, may be more affordable now.

Practical Implications: The A52's camera system is versatile for different scenarios, offering more options. However, it does not offer features like RAW or a 'Pro Mode' on video, which are more advanced.

Advantages of Google Pixel 9:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: The Tensor G4 chipset offers a large performance leap over the Snapdragon 720G, impacting all use cases.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate offers a noticeably smoother user experience in all scrolling.
  • Superior Camera Quality: Larger sensor and better processing result in better photo quality, particularly in low light and advanced video recording.
  • Better Video Recording: Better video resolution, frame rate, and stabilization.
  • Wireless Charging and Reverse Wireless Charging: Adds convenience not available on the A52.
  • Newer Software and More Updates: Latest version of Android with years of future updates.
  • Better Screen Protection - Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Better Connectivity - Bluetooth 5.3 vs Bluetooth 5.0, WiFi 6 and MIMO support, more GPS systems.
  • More RAM - 12GB RAM vs 4/6/8GB RAM on A52

Practical Implications: Pixel 9 provides a much smoother, faster experience for daily use. Camera performance is improved across the board, and the software experience is optimized for this hardware.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • A52 loses out on performance and future proofing: The A52 has an older processor, camera technology, and software.
  • Pixel 9 gives up dedicated camera lenses: Although the pixel 9 has a great primary camera lens, it loses dedicated depth and macro lenses that the A52 has.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who value versatility in their camera, and prefer a device with multiple camera lenses.
  • Use Cases: Casual photography, social media, everyday browsing, watching videos.
  • Why: It's a capable device for everyday tasks with more camera options than the Pixel, offered at a lower cost.

Google Pixel 9:

  • Ideal User: Users who want top-tier performance, the best camera quality, and the latest Android software.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, professional photography/videography, power users, multi-tasking, users who prioritize the latest software and features.
  • Why: It excels in performance, camera quality, and software experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is raw performance and future-proofing? (Pixel 9 is significantly faster)
  2. How important is camera versatility vs overall photo quality? (A52 has multiple lenses, Pixel 9 has a better main camera)
  3. What is your budget? (A52 should be more affordable)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget Shopper: If cost is a primary concern and your needs are basic, the Galaxy A52 offers a good value, with a versatile camera.
  • Photography Enthusiast: The Google Pixel 9 provides superior photo quality and video features, despite lacking multiple lenses.
  • Performance Seeker: The Google Pixel 9 is the clear winner for gamers and those who demand fast, smooth performance with the latest software.

My Choice

I would choose the Google Pixel 9.

Here's why:

  • Performance is Key: The Tensor G4 chip offers a significantly better performance experience. The smoother display with a 120Hz refresh rate is also a big plus. I prioritize responsiveness and the ability to use the phone for demanding tasks such as gaming and productivity.
  • Camera Quality: While the A52 offers versatility in its lens choices, the Pixel 9's primary camera will give better results in a wider variety of situations, especially in low light, and overall better video recording. I’d rather have high-quality photos and videos over having a macro and depth lens. The improved video features, and the inclusion of 'Pro Mode' with manual focus and RAW capabilities will give a more professional-grade experience.
  • Software & Future Proofing: The Pixel 9 comes with the latest Android version and will get software updates much longer than the A52. This makes the Pixel 9 the better choice for future usage.
  • Improved Convenience Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging are nice quality of life features. The extra connectivity with Wifi 6 and newer bluetooth are also a plus.
  • Better screen protection The added protection from Gorilla Glass Victus 2 is a good thing.
  • Value: While the Pixel 9 will likely cost more initially, it's a better long-term investment due to its superior performance, camera, software support and features. For my usage, the increased price is worth the added performance and features.

While the A52 has some features that might appeal to others, the Pixel 9 provides a noticeably superior user experience for my specific preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.