1. Specifications Comparison
Design
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Practical Impact |
Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 162.6 × 76.5 × 8.8 mm | Pixel 8 Pro is slightly larger; may be less comfortable for smaller hands. |
Weight | 189g | 213g | A52 is noticeably lighter; Pixel 8 Pro is heavier, potentially causing fatigue during extended use. |
Build | Standard | Standard | Both are standard smartphone designs, not foldable. |
Display
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Practical Impact |
Size | 6.5" | 6.7" | Pixel 8 Pro offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1344x2992 | Pixel 8 Pro offers significantly sharper text and images; better for detailed content and VR. |
PPI | 407 | 489 | Pixel 8 Pro has a visibly clearer and sharper screen due to higher pixel density. |
Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; minimal practical difference in display quality. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Pixel 8 Pro provides smoother scrolling and animations, making for a more fluid user experience. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 2400 nits | Pixel 8 Pro is dramatically brighter, much more usable in direct sunlight; A52 will be difficult to see outdoors |
Performance
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Practical Impact |
Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) | Pixel 8 Pro offers significantly faster processing for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and AI features. A52 will be much slower. |
Antutu Score | 341,212 | 1,142,984 | Pixel 8 Pro performs exceptionally better than A52 in benchmarks indicating a huge difference in overall performance. |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 | Pixel 8 Pro provides a vastly superior gaming and graphics experience. A52 will have much lower graphical performance. |
Camera
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Practical Impact |
Main Camera | 64MP f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm | 50MP f/1.69, 1/1.31", 1.2µm | Pixel 8 Pro has a larger sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and potentially better dynamic range. A52 has more megapixels. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10.8MP f/2.2, 1/2.65", 1.22µm | A52 has higher resolution for selfies; Pixel 8 Pro's larger pixels may lead to better low-light selfies. |
Telephoto Lens | None | 48MP f/2.8, 1/2.55", 0.7µm | Pixel 8 Pro has an extra telephoto lens, allowing for better optical zoom, which is essential for detailed shots from a distance. A52 has digital zoom. |
Wide Angle Lens | 12MP f/2.2 | None | A52 has a dedicated ultrawide lens for capturing expansive scenes. Pixel 8 Pro lacks dedicated wide-angle lens. |
Depth Lens | 5MP f/2.4 | None | A52 has a depth sensor dedicated for portrait shots. |
Macro Lens | 5MP f/2.4 | None | A52 has a dedicated macro lens for detailed close up photography. |
Wide + Macro | None | 48MP f/1.95, 0.8µm | Pixel 8 Pro uses one ultrawide with macro capabilities. |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS; 120fps slow-mo | 4K@60fps, 1080p@240fps with HDR, OIS, EIS; 240fps slow-mo | Pixel 8 Pro can capture higher quality videos in higher frame rates with additional features, with more slow motion capabilities and better stabilization. |
DxOMark | Not tested | Mobile: 153, Selfie: 145 | Pixel 8 Pro has a very high DxOMark score. A52 is not tested |
Features | Quadruple camera, OIS, EIS, HDR | Triple camera, Optical Zoom, OIS, EIS, RAW, NPU AI Engine | Pixel 8 Pro has more advanced features including RAW capture, pro mode, AI and optical zoom compared to A52. A52 has a quadruple camera setup. |
Battery
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Practical Impact |
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5050mAh | Pixel 8 Pro is likely to offer better battery life due to a higher capacity. |
Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 30W Fast Charging | Pixel 8 Pro can charge slightly faster than the A52. |
Features | QC2.0, AFC | Reverse, 23W Wireless | Pixel 8 Pro offers wireless charging and reverse charging which A52 does not support. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Lighter and more compact: More comfortable for extended use and those with smaller hands.
- Dedicated Ultrawide, Depth and Macro lenses: More versatile camera system with specialized lenses
- Lower Price: Will be significantly cheaper compared to the Pixel 8 Pro.
Google Pixel 8 Pro Advantages:
- Significantly better Performance: Superior chipset for demanding tasks, gaming and AI features.
- Superior Display: Higher resolution, refresh rate, and much higher brightness for better viewing experience, especially outdoors.
- Better Camera System: Larger sensors, telephoto lens, and advanced features, resulting in much higher overall photo and video quality.
- Larger Battery: Longer battery life and faster charging.
- Wireless & Reverse Charging: Offers more convenience for power management.
- Newer Software and Support: Longer software updates and access to the latest Android features.
- Better Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards.
Trade-offs:
- Google Pixel 8 Pro: Significantly more expensive and larger/heavier. Lacks dedicated Macro and Depth lenses.
- Samsung Galaxy A52: Much lower performance, inferior display, and less versatile camera in most scenarios, no wireless charging support.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, those who prioritize comfort, everyday users, and those who need a flexible camera setup at a lower price.
- Use Cases:
- Casual social media browsing, messaging, and basic app use.
- Users needing a lower price point.
- Users who prefer a lighter and more compact phone.
- Users who take regular macro and ultrawide shots.
- Users with limited gaming needs.
- Users who do not need top-tier performance.
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Ideal User: Power users, photographers, gamers, tech enthusiasts, those seeking the best performance, camera quality and latest features, and those who watch a lot of media.
- Use Cases:
- Demanding mobile gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
- Professional or amateur photographers and videographers looking for top-tier image quality, good zoom capability and extensive features.
- Frequent media consumption in various lighting conditions (especially outdoors).
- Users needing the latest software features and consistent updates.
- Users requiring long battery life with wireless/reverse charging capabilities.
- AI and machine learning focused tasks.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- Budget: How much are you willing to spend on a phone? The Pixel 8 Pro is significantly more expensive.
- Performance Needs: Do you need top-tier performance for demanding tasks, or is a mid-range performance sufficient?
- Camera Priorities: Do you prioritize image quality, advanced features like optical zoom and RAW capture, or do you prefer a versatile setup with wide, macro and depth lenses?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User: If your main focus is on basic smartphone functionality at a lower cost and camera versatility, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is the better choice.
- Scenario 2: Power User/Photographer: If you need the best performance, top-tier camera quality, and the latest features, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the superior option, despite the higher price.
- Scenario 3: Everyday User: If you want a good performing phone and don't need the top tier performance of the Pixel, or the specialized lenses of the A52, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the better choice due to its excellent all-round capabilities. However, if budget is a concern, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is suitable if you are willing to compromise performance and some features.
My Choice
If I were choosing, I would pick the Google Pixel 8 Pro. While the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a respectable mid-range phone, the Pixel 8 Pro offers significant improvements in areas that I value more such as performance and camera capabilities. The much higher brightness screen is crucial for outdoor visibility and the better video capture capabilities is very important to me.
Although the Pixel 8 Pro is more expensive and heavier, I believe the improvements it provides in the screen, speed, camera and battery life make it a much more compelling overall package.