Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Apple iPhone 13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 September 24, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 80.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 189 g 174 g
Height 159.9 mm 146.7 mm
Width 75.1 mm 71.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Red
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Pink
  • Starlight
  • Midnight

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1170 x 2532
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 87.1 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 87.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 40.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 3240 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Hexa-core (2x3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard)
GPU Adreno 618 Apple GPU (4-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG Lightning 2.0

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 11 15
Maximum OS Version 14 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Apple iPhone 13Practical Impact
Dimensions159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm146.7 x 71.5 x 7.7 mmThe A52 is noticeably larger and slightly thicker, potentially less comfortable for single-handed use or small pockets. The iPhone 13 is more compact.
Weight189g174gThe iPhone 13 is lighter, making it more comfortable to hold for extended periods.
BuildPlastic FrameAluminum FrameiPhone 13 feels more premium. The A52 feels less durable.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Apple iPhone 13Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.1"The A52 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption and gaming. The iPhone 13 is more compact and pocketable.
Resolution1080x24001170x2532The iPhone 13 has a slightly sharper display, but the difference is not always noticeable.
PPI407460The iPhone 13 offers a noticeably sharper image, particularly with text and detailed graphics.
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth provide excellent contrast, deep blacks, and vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzThe A52 has smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience. The iPhone 13 is not as smooth in comparison.
Brightness0 nits1200 nitsThe iPhone 13 has significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. The A52's screen would be hard to see.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Apple iPhone 13Practical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 720G (8nm)A15 Bionic (5nm)The A15 Bionic in the iPhone 13 offers vastly superior performance, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and more demanding gaming.
AnTuTu Score341,2121,256,049The iPhone 13 is significantly faster and more future-proof for resource-intensive tasks.
GPUAdreno 618Apple GPU (4-core)The Apple GPU in the iPhone 13 provides superior graphics performance for gaming and other graphics-intensive applications.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Apple iPhone 13Practical Impact
Main Camera Resolution64MP12MPThe A52 captures more detail due to the higher megapixel count in daylight. The iPhone 13 produces much better photos in low light due to sensor size and aperture.
Main Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.6The iPhone 13 gathers more light, resulting in better low-light photos and shallower depth of field.
Main Camera Sensor Size1/1.7"UnknownThe iPhone 13 will be much better in low light due to better sensors.
Selfie Camera Resolution32MP12MPThe A52 captures more detailed selfies in good lighting.
Wide Angle Lens12MP, f/2.212MP, f/2.4The A52's wide-angle lens will perform slightly better in low light.
Additional Lenses5MP Portrait, 5MP MacroNoneThe A52 has a dedicated portrait depth sensor, and macro camera, providing more versatile shooting options.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps4K@60fps, 1080p@240fpsThe iPhone 13 offers more advanced video recording capabilities including HDR and higher frame rates.
FeaturesQuadruple camera, Digital image stabilizationDual Camera, Manual Focus, Phase Detection AutofocusThe A52 has a versatile quad-camera setup, while the iPhone 13 offers more advanced features for photography purists.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52Apple iPhone 13Practical Impact
Capacity4500 mAh3240 mAhThe A52 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life.
Charging25W Fast Charging20W Fast Charging, 15W MagSafe, 7.5W QiThe A52 charges faster with its wired charger, while the iPhone 13 supports convenient MagSafe wireless charging with slightly slower Qi charging.
Battery TypeLi-PolymerLi-IonBoth are standard battery technologies with no major practical difference.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Provides a more immersive experience for media consumption and gaming.
  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate leads to more fluid scrolling and animations.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life due to higher capacity.
  • More Camera Lenses: Offers dedicated portrait and macro lenses for versatile shooting.
  • Expandable Storage Supports MicroSD expansion up to 1TB.

  • Fingerprint Sensor: Offers a convenient way to unlock the device.

  • Significantly Cheaper: The A52 costs significantly less than the iPhone 13 while providing great value for the price

Apple iPhone 13 Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: The A15 Bionic chip offers vastly superior speed and responsiveness.
  • Sharper Display: Higher pixel density results in a crisper image.
  • Superior Outdoor Visibility: Much higher brightness for use in bright sunlight.
  • Better Camera: Superior image quality, especially in low light and video recording capabilities.
  • Wireless Charging: Supports MagSafe wireless charging, offering convenience.
  • Premium Build Quality: Aluminum and glass design feels more luxurious.
  • Better Audio: Enhanced spatial audio and noise cancellation for clearer calls.

Trade-offs:

  • A52: Slower performance, lower display brightness, plastic build, weaker camera overall in low light.
  • iPhone 13: Smaller display, lower refresh rate, smaller battery, no macro lens, more expensive.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users looking for a large display and long battery life.
  • Users who value a large display for media consumption, browsing, and social media.
  • Casual photographers who want versatile camera options, including macro and portrait lenses.
  • Users who prefer a smoother experience through the high refresh rate.
  • Users who need expandable storage through an SD card.
  • Users who value a headphone jack.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Watching movies and videos on a larger screen.
  • Playing casual games and browsing social media.
  • Taking versatile photos in various situations.
  • Using the phone for extended periods without needing to recharge.
  • Listening to music with wired headphones.

Apple iPhone 13 Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize performance and speed above all else.
  • Users who want the best possible mobile camera experience.
  • Users who need the best outdoor visibility for bright conditions.
  • Users who value a compact, premium design.
  • Users heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem.
  • Users who prefer wireless charging.
  • Users who value software updates and long-term support.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Gaming, running complex apps, and heavy multitasking.
  • Taking high-quality photos and videos, especially in low light.
  • Using the phone in bright outdoor environments.
  • Preferring the convenience of wireless charging.
  • Integrating with other Apple products like Apple Watch and AirPods.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a better price-to-value ratio for those focused on a larger display, longer battery life, and versatile camera options at a lower cost.
  • The Apple iPhone 13 is a premium option that delivers top-tier performance, a superior camera, and a brighter display, but at a higher cost.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The iPhone 13 is significantly more expensive.
  2. What is more important: performance or display size and battery life? The iPhone 13 excels in performance, while the A52 offers a larger screen and longer battery life.
  3. Do you need a professional grade camera or a versatile camera for general use? The iPhone has a significantly better camera for professional use and in low light, while the A52 offers versatility.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Heavy gamer on a budget: Go with the iPhone 13 if your budget allows, or be forced to compromise and get the A52.
  • Scenario 2: Content creator focused on photography: The iPhone 13 is the best choice for image quality and video.
  • Scenario 3: Casual user who wants a big screen for media: The Galaxy A52 is the ideal choice.
  • Scenario 4: Student with a tight budget: The Galaxy A52 is the ideal choice.
  • Scenario 5: Professional who depends on the phone: The iPhone 13 is the best choice.
  • Scenario 6: Someone already invested in the Apple Ecosystem: The iPhone 13 is the best choice.
  • Scenario 7: Someone who needs expandable storage and headphone jack: The Galaxy A52 is the best choice.
  • Scenario 8: Someone who needs best screen quality: The iPhone 13 is the best choice.

My Choice

If I were choosing, I would personally pick the Apple iPhone 13. While I appreciate the larger screen and smoother refresh rate of the Galaxy A52, the superior performance and camera quality of the iPhone 13 are more important to me. My primary use cases involve using many apps, high end gaming and taking high-quality photos and videos in various lighting conditions, so the iPhone 13’s A15 Bionic chip and advanced camera system make it the clear winner for my needs. The more compact design is also better for pocketability. The only trade-offs I would make are the smaller battery and the lack of a fingerprint sensor but I would be willing to live with it for the best possible user experience. Also, the brighter screen of the iPhone 13 would help for outdoor visibility, especially in bright sunlight.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.