Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 163.3 × 75.9 × 8.9 mm | Poco X3 GT is slightly taller and thicker, which may impact comfort in smaller hands. |
| Weight | 189g | 193g | Both phones are similar in weight and should feel comparable in hand. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Minimal difference in screen size; not noticeable for most users |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Identical resolution means same sharpness of images/text |
| PPI | 407 | 399 | Virtually identical pixel density for similarly sharp visuals. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility, which is ideal for media consumption and everyday use. IPS is still good but has lower contrast and black levels. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer the same level of smooth scrolling and animation. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones' peak brightness is listed as 0 nits, which is incorrect. Without actual values it is difficult to compare, however, we know the AMOLED screen will look better outdoors. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Dimensity 1100 offers significantly higher performance, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming experience. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 745,283 | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT has almost double the performance as per Antutu scores. This difference indicates a large performance gap. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 is more powerful, leading to better graphics performance in games and other GPU-intensive tasks. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Poco X3 GT offers a larger battery capacity, resulting in potentially longer battery life on a single charge. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 67W fast charging | Poco X3 GT charges much faster, reducing downtime. This can be a huge practical benefit for people who use their phone a lot. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.8µm | 64MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Omnivision OV64B, 0.7µm | A52 5G's larger sensor captures more light and has larger pixels, likely resulting in better low-light performance and more detail. The differences in the aperture are not very significant for end users. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.8µm | 16MP, f/2.45 | A52 5G has much higher resolution selfie camera with a wider aperture, likely producing better detailed and brighter selfies |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", Samsung S5K3L6, 1.12µm | None | A52 5G offers a dedicated wide-angle lens for capturing more in the scene. |
| Portrait Camera | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | A52 5G offers a dedicated depth sensor lens for better portrait mode effects. |
| Macro Camera | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | A52 5G offers a dedicated macro lens for capturing detailed close-up shots. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | Up to 4K@30fps | Both offer similar high-resolution recording. A52 5G has EIS in more recording options and the poco does not come with video stabilization. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradeable to 14) | Android 11 | Samsung provides longer software support. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | Poco X3 GT supports a newer and faster Wi-Fi standard, resulting in better wireless performance. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 | Poco X3 GT supports a newer version of Bluetooth with improved connection stability, data transfer, and efficiency, it also has better audio codecs than the A52. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, BeiDou (B1) | Poco X3 GT has additional satellite support, for more accurate tracking. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both devices offer the same storage options. |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 8GB | The Poco X3 GT's 8GB of RAM provides smooth multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | No expandability means you will have to manage your storage on both devices. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Poco X3 GT has better audio playback and recording features with hi-res audio and stereo speakers. The A52 5G has dolby digital plus. |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Poco X3 GT fingerprint sensor is more convienient. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Poco X3 GT offers superior screen protection. |
| Sensors | |||
| Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G additionally features: Proximity, Hall, Geomagnetic; Xiaomi Poco X3 GT additionally features: Compass, Ultrasonic proximity virtual. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display Technology: AMOLED screen offers better color reproduction, deeper blacks, and better energy efficiency compared to the IPS LCD on the Poco X3 GT. This is very noticeable when using the phones in different lighting conditions.
- More Camera Versatility: The inclusion of a wide-angle, portrait mode, and macro lens gives users more flexibility in capturing different types of shots.
- Better Selfie Camera: Higher resolution and wider aperture offer better quality selfies.
- Optical Image Stabilization The primary camera has OIS which can lead to sharper photos, even when the phone is moving.
- Longer Software Support: Samsung offers better software support compared to Xiaomi.
- Additional Sensors The A52 has a hall and geomagnetic sensor
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT Advantages:
- Significantly Higher Performance: Dimensity 1100 chipset offers much better processing power, crucial for gaming and heavy multitasking.
- Faster Charging: 67W charging is significantly faster than the 25W on the Galaxy A52 5G, a huge benefit for those needing quick battery top-ups.
- Larger Battery: 5000 mAh provides potentially longer battery life.
- Better Audio: Stereo speakers and Hi-Res audio support offer a superior audio experience for media consumption.
- Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.2 provides more stability and better features.
- Newer Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6 offers faster and more stable wireless connectivity.
- Superior Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus is significantly stronger than Gorilla Glass 5.
- Better fingerprint reader placement Side mounted readers tend to be more natural.
- Additional Sensors The Poco X3 GT has a compass and an ultrasonic proximity sensor.
Trade-offs:
- The A52 5G's superior display and camera flexibility come at the cost of processing power and charging speed.
- The Poco X3 GT's focus on performance and battery life sacrifices display quality and some camera features.
- The Poco X3 GT has some slightly larger dimensions.
- The Poco X3 GT comes with no guarantee of software updates.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Ideal User:
- Media Consumers: Users who watch a lot of videos, movies, and TV shows, and value a high-quality AMOLED display with good color accuracy.
- Social Media Enthusiasts: Users who take many selfies, enjoy the flexibility of multiple camera lenses, and want a good front-facing camera.
- General-Purpose Users: Individuals who want a balanced, reliable phone with a good all-around feature set.
- Users who value software updates: People who want more security updates or prefer more modern OS features.
Use Cases:
- Watching movies and videos on the go.
- Taking high-quality selfies and social media posts.
- Everyday tasks like browsing the internet, social media, and emails.
- People who prefer a more premium-feeling phone.
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT Ideal User:
- Gamers: Users who want a device capable of playing graphically intensive games at high framerates, with a smooth gameplay experience.
- Power Users: Those who need fast charging and a long-lasting battery for extended usage.
- Multi-Taskers: Individuals who frequently switch between apps and require high processing power.
- People who consume more audio: the better audio features make this device more ideal for people who prefer listening to music through their device.
Use Cases:
- Gaming sessions with high-performance demands.
- Heavy multitasking for productivity.
- Long hours away from a charger.
- People who prefer a more affordable and powerful device.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your primary use case? (Gaming, media consumption, social media, general use)
- How important are display quality and camera versatility? (Consider if AMOLED and additional camera lenses are essential)
- How important are raw performance and battery life? (Consider how much gaming and heavy multitasking you will do)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Casual Use with a focus on Media
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Its superior display makes it ideal for media consumption and general use. The camera versatility and great selfie camera are also big advantages.
- Scenario 2: Gaming and Heavy Usage
- Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. It provides superior performance and faster charging, and also has a larger battery for longer gaming and heavy usage sessions.
- Scenario 3: Balanced Usage on a Budget
- Recommendation: This depends on what is most important for you. If you prefer a better display, the A52 5G would be recommended, but if you want better performance, the Poco X3 GT would be the better choice.
Personal Choice
If I were to choose between these two phones, I would lean towards the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT.
Reasoning:
While I appreciate the superior display quality of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, my personal use case involves a lot of mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, and long days away from a charger. The Xiaomi Poco X3 GT's superior processor, faster charging, larger battery, and better audio all align with my primary needs and therefore it would offer a better value for me. Although the lack of a wide-angle camera is a slight drawback for me, the performance increase far outweighs this trade off. The stronger screen protection is also a benefit.
