Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco M6 4G
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Xiaomi Poco M6 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 168.6 × 76.3 × 8.3 mm | Poco M6 4G is larger and may be less comfortable for one-handed use; A52 5G is more compact. |
| Weight | 189g | 205g | A52 5G is lighter and more comfortable for extended periods. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.79" | Poco M6 4G has a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption but may be less pocketable. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2460 | Both offer sharp displays, though the difference is negligible. |
| PPI | 407 | 396 | Both have similar sharpness, resulting in nearly the same viewing experience. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A52 5G offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, resulting in a more vibrant display. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | A52 5G has smoother animations and scrolling. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness is identical and unknown, making it hard to comment on outdoor visibility. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8 nm) | Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm) | A52 5G offers faster performance in general use and gaming. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 269,266 | A52 5G is noticeably faster in benchmarks, resulting in smoother app loading and overall responsiveness. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 | A52 5G offers better graphics performance, ideal for gaming. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm | 108MP, f/1.75, 1/1.67", 0.64µm | Poco M6 4G has higher megapixel count and larger sensor, potentially better detail and low-light performance. |
| Front Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 13MP, f/2.45 | A52 5G has significantly higher resolution and wider aperture for better selfies. |
| Wide Angle | 13MP, f/2.2 | Not available | A52 5G can capture wider scenes. |
| Portrait Mode | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not available | A52 5G can capture depth-of-field effects. |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 5G can capture more detailed close-up shots. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | A52 5G allows for higher resolution video capture. |
| Stabilization | EIS, OIS (A52 5G) | Digital IS (M6 4G) | A52 5G has optical stabilization, offering better video quality. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5030mAh | Poco M6 4G has larger battery and likely offers better battery life. |
| Charging | 25W | 33W | Poco M6 4G has faster charging. |
| Battery Features | QC2.0, AFC | Reverse charging | A52 5G supports faster charging protocols, Poco M6 4G can act as a power bank. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | Poco M6 4G comes with the latest Android version out of the box. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wifi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both offer similar standards. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 | Poco M6 4G has a newer version of Bluetooth with a wider variety of codecs |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Both offer similar location capabilities. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano + Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano + Nano) | Both offer dual SIM capabilities. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128 GB or 256 GB | 128 GB or 256 GB | Same storage options. |
| RAM | 6 GB or 8 GB | 6 GB or 8 GB | Both phones have similar memory options for multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither support expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Basic audio features | A52 5G provides a richer audio experience. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor is faster and more reliable. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | A52 5G has superior screen protection. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED technology with 120Hz refresh rate provides better visual quality and smoother animations.
- Better Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset and Adreno 619 GPU offer faster performance.
- Higher Quality Camera: Better video recording (4K) and more versatile setup with wide-angle, portrait, and macro lenses, also with OIS for less shaky photos and videos.
- Better Audio: Enhanced sound experience through Dolby Atmos.
- Build Quality: Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection.
- More Camera Features: Includes features such as OIS, Night Mode, Panorama which is absent from the M6.
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G Advantages:
- Larger Battery: 5030mAh battery offers potentially longer battery life.
- Faster Charging: 33W charging is faster than A52 5G’s 25W charging.
- Newer Bluetooth: Offers Bluetooth 5.4, with modern codecs.
- Newer Software: Android 14 out-of-the-box provides more up-to-date features.
- Reverse Charging: Can be used to charge other devices.
- Higher Resolution Main Camera: 108MP main camera may capture more detail in well-lit conditions.
Trade-offs:
- The A52 5G sacrifices battery capacity and charging speed for superior display and camera experience.
- The Poco M6 4G sacrifices the display quality, better audio and full camera features for longer battery life and a more modern operating system.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Ideal Users:
- Media Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize display quality for streaming and browsing.
- Photography/Videography Lovers: Users who need high-quality cameras for photos and 4K videos.
- Gamers: Users who want smoother and more responsive gameplay.
- Users who value overall premium experience: Enhanced audio, higher screen protection.
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G Ideal Users:
- Heavy Users: Users who prioritize longer battery life and fast charging.
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users looking for a good balance of features at a lower price.
- Users who value software updates: Newest android version out-of-the-box, even though software update promises from Xiaomi are sometimes questionable.
Specific Use Cases:
- Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Best for watching videos, taking high-quality photos and videos, mobile gaming, and general daily use with a focus on display quality.
- Xiaomi Poco M6 4G: Best for long days away from power outlets, users looking for a low cost daily driver with decent camera performance, casual gaming.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is likely to be more expensive, reflecting its superior display, camera and performance.
- The Xiaomi Poco M6 4G is a budget-friendly option for users focused on battery life and newer software.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- Display Quality: Is a vibrant AMOLED display and high refresh rate important for you?
- Camera Needs: Do you prioritize high-quality photos, video, and versatile camera features (such as OIS)?
- Battery Life vs. Performance: Do you prefer longer battery life with slightly less performance, or better performance and display with slightly less battery life?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Media Consumption and Photography: If you watch a lot of videos, enjoy high-quality photos, and video, and value a smoother visual experience, choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
- Scenario 2: Battery Life and Budget: If you need a phone that lasts all day and prefer the latest software and want to save money, the Xiaomi Poco M6 4G is the better choice.
- Scenario 3: General Use with Balance: If you want a balance between performance and battery life, but have a preference for a better camera system, consider the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. If you just want to save money, the Poco is a better choice.
My Choice
Personally, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. While the Poco M6 4G has a larger battery and faster charging, the superior AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, coupled with the better camera system (including OIS), and higher performance are more important to me. The enhanced audio with Dolby Atmos also adds to the overall experience, making it a more enjoyable device for media consumption and photography, which is important for my daily usage. The A52 5G, even being older, offers a more rounded premium experience, and I believe the trade-off in battery life is acceptable for the gains in display and camera quality. However, if battery life and budget are critical, the Poco is undoubtedly a good option.
