1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | vivo Y76 5G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 163.8 × 75 × 7.8 mm | vivo Y76 5G is slightly taller and thinner, while the A52 5G is a bit more compact but thicker. The size difference is minimal but the thickness might make the A52 feel more substantial. |
| Weight | 189g | 175g | vivo Y76 5G is 14g lighter, which might feel more comfortable during long use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.58" | Negligible difference in size; both are standard-sized displays |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | Virtually identical sharpness; user won't see any visible difference. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 407 | 401 | Nearly identical pixel density, resulting in similar clarity and detail. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A52 5G's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, better viewing experience, especially for media consumption and dark mode usage. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | A52 5G's 120Hz refresh rate provides significantly smoother scrolling and animations, making the phone feel more responsive; better for gaming and overall interface smoothness. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness information is missing - this is a critical specification for outdoor visibility. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Both offer similar real-world performance for daily tasks, but the Snapdragon is slightly more powerful for graphics-intensive tasks. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 389,300 | Very similar performance; both phones are comparable in terms of speed. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Both handle casual gaming well, but the Adreno 619 in the A52 5G may provide better graphics performance in more demanding games. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Res. | 64MP (f/1.8) | 50MP (f/1.8) | A52 5G's 64MP sensor captures more detail and allows for higher resolution photos. |
| Selfie Camera Res. | 32MP (f/2.2) | 16MP (f/2.0) | A52 5G's 32MP front camera captures more detailed selfies. The wider aperture on the Y76 5G's selfie camera (f/2.0 vs f/2.2) could improve low light performance by a small margin. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP (f/2.2) | None | A52 5G offers a dedicated ultra-wide lens for capturing wider landscape shots; a versatile option for different scenarios. |
| Portrait (Depth) Lens | 5MP (f/2.4) | 2MP (f/2.4) | A52 5G offers a better depth sensor, which could result in more accurate and detailed bokeh/background blur effects. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP (f/2.4) | 2MP (f/2.4) | A52 5G offers a better macro camera, which could result in sharper macro photos |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps w/ EIS | 1080p@30fps w/ EIS | A52 5G can record higher resolution 4K videos. Also has more features in video recording. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4100mAh | A52 5G has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering a bit longer battery life, however the difference is relatively small |
| Charging | 25W | 44W | Y76 5G charges significantly faster, reducing charging downtime. |
| Other | |||
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage; users must rely on internal storage options. |
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Basic Audio | A52 5G offers higher quality audio output and more immersive listening experience, especially with headphones or external speakers. |
| Fingerprint Sensor | basic | side-mounted | Y76 5G has a more advanced side-mounted fingerprint sensor, it might be faster and more convenient for some users. |
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | A52 5G has better screen protection using Gorilla Glass 5, offering better scratch and damage resistance. |
| OS | Android 11 (up to 14) | Android 11 | A52 5G has guaranteed software updates to Android 14, offering access to newer features and improved security for longer; the Y76 5G doesn't have official information about future updates |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen with 120Hz refresh rate offers a significantly better visual experience with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother animations.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras, plus a dedicated ultra-wide lens, provides more versatility and better photo quality. 4K video recording is a big plus.
- Larger Battery: Slightly larger battery could translate to slightly longer battery life, although real-world usage will vary.
- Software Updates: Guaranteed Android 14 update, ensuring users have access to latest features and improved security for longer
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos support provides a superior audio experience.
- Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 offers better resistance to scratches and damage.
vivo Y76 5G Advantages:
- Faster Charging: 44W fast charging is significantly quicker than the 25W on the A52 5G, reducing charging time.
- Side Mounted Fingerprint: Side-mounted fingerprint can be more convenient for some users
- Lighter: Slightly lighter build, may be preferred for long use by some.
Trade-offs:
- The A52 5G trades faster charging for a better display and camera system and the latest software updates
- The Y76 5G trades display and camera quality for faster charging and lighter weight.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Ideal Users:
- Users who prioritize display quality and a premium visual experience.
- Photography enthusiasts who value a versatile camera system and better image quality.
- Users who appreciate software updates and a more modern OS.
- Multimedia consumers who enjoy streaming videos, playing games, and listening to music on their phone
- Use Cases:
- Watching videos and movies with high visual clarity and vibrant colors.
- Taking photos in various scenarios, including landscapes, close-ups, and low-light situations.
- Playing games with smoother animations and better graphics performance.
- Enjoying high-quality audio experience
- Long-term use with software support and protection
vivo Y76 5G:
- Ideal Users:
- Users who value rapid charging and are often on the go.
- Budget-conscious buyers looking for good performance at a more affordable price.
- Users who prefer a lighter device and appreciate a side mounted fingerprint sensor
- Users who do not require the best image and video quality
- Use Cases:
- Quickly charging their phone on the go between meetings or during travel
- Day-to-day tasks such as browsing, social media, and communication
- Occasional photography, suitable for casual use.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Do I prioritize display quality and a premium visual experience, or is fast charging more crucial? If display is the priority choose Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. If fast charging is important, choose vivo Y76 5G.
- How important is camera quality, versatility, and video capabilities for my usage? If you need quality and versatility in camera, go for Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
- Do I value guaranteed software updates and long-term software support? If yes, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has guaranteed updates
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
Scenario 1: Media Enthusiast & Photographer - If you watch a lot of videos and take lots of photos or videos, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the better choice due to its superior display, camera system, audio quality and guaranteed software updates.
Scenario 2: On-the-Go User & Budget-Conscious - If you're on the go often and prefer quicker charge times with less time plugged in the vivo Y76 5G is a solid choice, it is lighter and comes with a fast charge.
Scenario 3: Balanced User - If you need a balance of display, performance and camera quality, with software updates and are happy with medium battery charging, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is still the better choice, however consider the vivo if quick charge and lighter weight is paramount.
My Choice and Explanation
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. My priorities are a high-quality display and a versatile camera system. The A52 5G's AMOLED screen with its 120Hz refresh rate would provide a noticeably better viewing experience for my daily usage, which includes media consumption and browsing. The higher resolution camera and additional lenses also makes it a better option for photography enthusiasts. Although, the charging speed is slower, I would happily trade it for a better visual experience and a more versatile camera system with software updates.
