1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | vivo X100 Pro | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2021-03-19 | 2023-11-21 | The vivo X100 Pro is a significantly newer device, meaning it benefits from newer technology and advancements. |
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 164.1 × 75.3 × 8.9 mm | The vivo X100 Pro is slightly taller and thicker, resulting in a larger overall size and may be less comfortable for smaller hands. |
| Weight | 189g | 221g | The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. The vivo X100 Pro's heavier build can make it feel more substantial and premium. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.78" | The vivo X100 Pro offers a slightly larger screen, providing a more immersive viewing experience for multimedia and gaming. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | The vivo X100 Pro has a higher resolution screen resulting in sharper text and images. |
| PPI | 407 | 452 | The vivo X100 Pro has a higher pixel density, contributing to a slightly sharper and more detailed display. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both have similar display technology, providing vibrant colors, deep blacks and excellent contrast. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, making for a more fluid user experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 3000 nits | The vivo X100 Pro boasts significantly higher brightness, making it much more visible under direct sunlight. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G brightness is missing, making comparison difficult in this respect. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) | The vivo X100 Pro's chipset is significantly more powerful, resulting in much faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 1,881,325 | The vivo X100 Pro demonstrates substantially higher benchmark scores, indicating a significantly faster overall performance. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | The vivo X100 Pro’s GPU is much more powerful, leading to smoother graphics and better gaming performance. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Resolution | 64MP | 50MP | The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has higher resolution, while the vivo X100 Pro utilizes a much larger sensor and better pixel size, which typically means higher quality photos, especially in low light. |
| Main Camera Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.75 | The vivo X100 Pro has a wider aperture, allowing more light to reach the sensor, which can result in better low-light performance. |
| Main Camera Sensor Size | 1/1.7" | 1" | The vivo X100 Pro has much larger sensor, which can result in better low-light performance and improved dynamic range. |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 32MP | 32MP | Both have the same resolution for selfies. |
| Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 | The vivo X100 Pro has a slightly wider aperture, potentially resulting in slightly better low-light performance in selfies. |
| Wide Angle Resolution | 13MP | 50MP | The vivo X100 Pro has a significantly higher resolution, leading to sharper images with more detail. |
| Wide Angle Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 | The vivo X100 Pro has a wider aperture which would likely lead to slightly improved low-light performance with the wide angle lens. |
| Telephoto Camera | None | 50MP, f/2.5 | The vivo X100 Pro includes a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom capabilities. |
| Macro Camera | 5MP | None | The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a dedicated Macro lens. |
| Video Resolution | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps | The vivo X100 Pro can record higher resolution videos. |
| Slow-motion | 120 fps | 960 fps | The vivo X100 Pro can record much slower motion videos. |
| DxOMark Score (Mobile) | - | 150 | The vivo X100 Pro's camera is rated highly by DXOMark indicating strong photo and video capabilities. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G does not have a score for comparison. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5400mAh | The vivo X100 Pro has a larger battery, which should lead to longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 100W fast charging | The vivo X100 Pro charges much faster, allowing for significantly quicker battery refills. |
| Features | Non-removable, QC2.0, AFC | Non-removable, Reverse charging, Wireless charging 50W | vivo X100 Pro provides more convenience with fast wireless charging and reverse charging, while Samsung A52 has proprietary charging features. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (up to 14) | Android 14 (up to 15) | The vivo X100 Pro comes with a newer Android version and will likely receive more future updates. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 | The vivo X100 Pro supports the latest Wi-Fi standards, offering faster speeds, lower latency, and better performance on congested networks. |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 | The vivo X100 Pro has a newer version with improved power efficiency and better range. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2), NavIC System, QZSS (L1 + L5) | The vivo X100 Pro offers much improved accuracy due to more satelite support and better precision. |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM + eSIM | The vivo X100 Pro offers eSIM for digital carrier switching, offering more flexibility. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G only supports Nano SIMs. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128 GB or 256 GB | 256 GB, 512 GB or 1024GB | The vivo X100 Pro has a much larger maximum storage option. |
| RAM | 6 GB or 8 GB | 12 GB or 16 GB | The vivo X100 Pro offers more RAM for improved multitasking and smoother app performance. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | vivo X100 Pro has a more versatile audio set with high-res audio and stereo speakers for an enhanced audio experience, while the A52 offers Dolby Digital Plus. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint Sensor | Both devices utilize basic fingerprint sensors for biometric authentication. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G uses superior screen protection. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | The vivo X100 Pro has a more comprehensive suite of sensors. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Lighter Build: Significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and pocketability.
- Macro Lens: Offers a dedicated macro camera for close-up photography.
- Screen Protection: Features Corning Gorilla Glass 5, providing better screen protection against scratches and drops.
- Lower Price: As an older model it is likely to be available at a lower price point.
Practical Implications: The A52 5G is better for those who prefer a lighter phone with adequate cameras. The dedicated macro lens can be useful for specific photography needs. Corning Gorilla Glass offers some piece of mind for those concerned with screen damage.
vivo X100 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Mediatek Dimensity 9300 chipset provides substantially faster performance, making for much smoother and faster use experience in all categories including gaming and multitasking.
- Higher Resolution and Brighter Display: Sharper and significantly brighter display that's more visible in direct sunlight.
- Larger Battery and Faster Charging: Much larger battery with significantly faster wired and wireless charging for longer battery life and shorter charging times.
- Better Cameras: A larger sensor on the main camera, dedicated telephoto lens, and higher quality video recording.
- Newer Software: Ships with a newer version of Android (Android 14) offering more recent features and longer software support.
- Advanced Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth versions, as well as eSIM, and much more accurate GPS.
- Higher Quality Audio: Hi-res audio and stereo speakers provide a much richer audio experience
Practical Implications: The X100 Pro is significantly better for users who need a powerful, future-proof device with excellent camera and a very fast refresh rate. The superior screen, battery life, and charging speed are also significant benefits.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Weight: The vivo X100 Pro is much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
- Size: The X100 Pro has a larger footprint.
- Price: The vivo X100 Pro, being a newer flagship device is significantly more expensive.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who need a reliable phone for everyday use, including web browsing, social media, and light photography. Users who prioritize a lighter and more comfortable device.
- Use Cases:
- Casual mobile gaming.
- Everyday photography and social media.
- Standard multimedia consumption.
- General productivity tasks.
vivo X100 Pro:
- Ideal User: Power users, photography enthusiasts, and mobile gamers who need a high-performance device with a top-tier camera system. Those who prioritize a bright and sharp display with excellent battery life.
- Use Cases:
- High-end mobile gaming.
- Professional-grade mobile photography and videography.
- Demanding multitasking and app use.
- Multimedia consumption in bright environments.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Offers good value for budget-conscious consumers, providing a reliable mid-range experience for a lower price.
- vivo X100 Pro: Represents a high-end, premium experience with a corresponding price tag.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is my budget? The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G will be significantly more affordable.
- How important is performance and gaming? The vivo X100 Pro is the superior choice for performance and gaming.
- What are my camera needs? The vivo X100 Pro has the more capable camera system.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget-Conscious User: If budget is the primary concern, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the better option, offering a satisfactory experience for a lower price point.
- Performance-Oriented User: For those who need the best possible performance and gaming experience, the vivo X100 Pro is the clear choice.
- Photography Enthusiast: The vivo X100 Pro will produce higher quality results, with a more capable camera system.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the vivo X100 Pro. Although it's heavier and more expensive, the difference in performance is staggering. The drastically improved chipset, display, battery, and camera quality make it the more appealing device overall. I value a fast and smooth experience, and the X100 Pro clearly offers that. I am also very interested in photography, and the X100 Pro's camera specifications are significantly better, including the much improved main camera sensor and additional telephoto lens. While the A52 5G has its merits as a budget-friendly option, the sheer leap in performance, features, and camera quality of the X100 Pro justify its higher cost. The additional features of the X100 Pro such as the high-res audio, and fast charging also make it a more compelling and modern phone.
