Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 189 g 202 g
Height 159.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 619 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. vivo X100

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5Gvivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Launch Date2021-03-192023-11-21The vivo X100 is significantly newer, benefiting from more recent technology and software advancements.
Dimensions159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm164.1 × 75.2 × 8.5 mmThe vivo X100 is slightly taller and thicker, with a negligible difference in width. It may feel slightly larger in hand.
Weight189g202gThe Samsung A52 5G is slightly lighter, which could be preferable for extended one-handed use.
Display
Size6.5"6.78"The vivo X100 offers a more immersive experience with its larger screen, better for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001260x2800The vivo X100's higher resolution results in noticeably sharper text and images, ideal for viewing high-resolution content.
PPI407452The vivo X100's higher pixel density contributes to a crisper image, especially noticeable when viewing small details.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks typical of AMOLED panels.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits3000 nitsThe vivo X100 provides dramatically better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight, making it much easier to use in sunny conditions.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)The vivo X100's significantly newer and more powerful chipset will result in much faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score384,8531,881,325The vivo X100’s substantially higher score indicates significantly better overall performance for demanding tasks and games.
GPUAdreno 619Immortalis-G720 MC12The vivo X100's superior GPU will provide a much better gaming experience.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhThe vivo X100 has a larger battery capacity, likely resulting in longer battery life between charges.
Charging25W fast charging120W fast chargingThe vivo X100's dramatically faster charging speeds will allow users to quickly top up the battery and spend less time plugged in.
FeaturesNon-removable, QC2.0 and AFC.Non-removableThe vivo X100 lacks QC2.0 and AFC; both have non-removable battery.
Camera
Standard Camera64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.8µm50MP, f/1.57, 1/1.31", Sony IMX920, 1.2µmThe vivo X100 has a larger sensor and wider aperture, enabling it to capture better images, especially in low light despite having fewer megapixels.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.8µm32MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", Samsung S5KGD2, 0.8µmThe vivo X100 has a slightly wider aperture, potentially allowing slightly better low-light selfies.
Telephoto LensNone64MP, f/2.6, 1/2", Omnivision OV64B, 0.7µmThe vivo X100 has a dedicated telephoto lens for zooming in on distant subjects, which is missing from Samsung A52 5G.
Wide Angle Lens13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", Samsung S5K3L6, 1.12µm50MP, f/2.0, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN1, 0.64µmThe vivo X100 has a much higher resolution wide-angle lens and a wider aperture allowing for more detail and brightness.
Portrait Mode (depth)5MP, f/2.4NoneThe Samsung A52 5G has a dedicated depth sensor that might assist with portrait mode quality.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.4NoneThe Samsung A52 5G has a dedicated macro lens for close-up photos, which is missing on the vivo X100.
Video4K@30fps with EISYesBoth phones record video and offer slow-motion capabilities, but the vivo X100's slow-motion is higher. The Samsung A52 5G lists specific video resolutions and EIS support, while details for vivo X100 are limited.
Features4K Video, Digital zoom, Quadruple camera, OIS etcCinematic Mode, 4K Video, Optical zoom, Triple camera, Gimbal, OIS etcThe vivo X100 offers a more versatile set of camera features, including optical zoom and gimbal stabilization. It also offers the ability to take RAW images.
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 14Android 14The vivo X100 ships with a newer version of Android, meaning users will benefit from the latest features and security updates.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11ac802.11be (WiFi 7)The vivo X100 supports newer WiFi standards (Wi-Fi 7), offering potentially faster speeds and better performance.
Bluetooth5.05.4The vivo X100 has a newer version of Bluetooth, offering potentially faster speeds and better connectivity.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5) etc.The vivo X100 supports more satellite systems for improved location accuracy, especially in challenging environments.
SIMDual SIM (Nano)Dual SIM (Nano)Both offer dual SIM functionality.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB256/512/1024 GBThe vivo X100 offers significantly more storage capacity, which is great for users who have a lot of media.
RAM6/8 GB12/16 GBThe vivo X100 offers more RAM, improving multitasking performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersThe vivo X100 has stereo speakers and higher quality audio playback.
Security
Featuresbasic fingerprint sensorbasic fingerprint sensorBoth phones use basic fingerprint sensors.
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownSamsung Galaxy A52 5G uses Gorilla Glass 5, providing good screen protection against scratches. The vivo X100's screen protection is unknown.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeThe vivo X100 has more sensors than the Samsung A52 5G.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended use and easier to handle.
  • Macro and Depth sensors: Dedicated sensors for macro and portrait shots which the vivo X100 lacks, although this does not mean the quality is better.
  • Known screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides solid screen protection against scratches and damage.

vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Significantly newer and more powerful processor: The Mediatek Dimensity 9300 provides dramatically better performance for all tasks, including gaming and heavy multitasking.
  • Superior display: Higher resolution, greater brightness, larger screen that provides better viewing experiences, especially outdoors.
  • Larger battery and faster charging: Longer battery life and much faster charging speeds are a major convenience.
  • More advanced cameras: Better primary sensor, wide-angle sensor, and the inclusion of a telephoto lens as well as Gimbal and OIS result in more versatile and superior image and video quality.
  • Larger storage options and RAM: More internal storage and RAM result in better performance overall.
  • Newer OS: Ships with Android 14, meaning better feature set and security.
  • Faster connectivity: Supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 for faster, more reliable connections.
  • Superior audio Has both Hi-Res audio and stereo speakers.

Trade-offs:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers dedicated macro and depth sensors and is slightly lighter, while the vivo X100 provides superior performance, camera quality, display, and battery life.
  • The Samsung A52 5G screen protection is known (Gorilla Glass 5), the vivo X100 is unknown.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal Users for Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:

  • Budget-conscious users: Those seeking a reliable phone with a good display and acceptable performance at a lower price point.
  • Users who prioritize light weight and comfortable handling: Those who find larger, heavier phones cumbersome.
  • Users who take a lot of macro or portrait shots: Those who want dedicated sensors for these types of photography.

Ideal Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:

  • Everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging.
  • Casual photography, including macro shots.
  • Users who prefer lighter phones for extended use.

Ideal Users for vivo X100:

  • Power users: Those who need top-tier performance for gaming, heavy multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Those who want the best possible camera system for photos and videos, including zooming capabilities.
  • Users who prioritize display quality: Those who consume a lot of media and need a large, high-resolution, bright screen.
  • Users who value fast charging and long battery life: Those who don't want to worry about running out of battery throughout the day.
  • Users who want top of the line audio quality: Those who want good stereo speakers with Hi-Res Audio.

Ideal Use Cases for vivo X100:

  • Mobile gaming and resource-intensive applications.
  • High-quality photography and videography in all conditions.
  • Outdoor usage in bright sunlight.
  • Media consumption (videos, movies, etc.).
  • Users who use their phone for most tasks.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers to Consider:

  1. How important is performance for my daily usage? (e.g., gaming, multitasking, etc.).
  2. How much do I value camera quality and features? (e.g., zooming, low-light performance, etc.).
  3. What is my budget and am I willing to pay more for top-tier features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is the primary concern, and usage is mainly for basic tasks: The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is sufficient.
  • Scenario 2: Demanding user requiring top-tier performance, camera quality, and display: The vivo X100 is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 3: Desire for high quality photography, and good performance but on a budget: The vivo X100 provides superior image quality and performance, but comes with a price premium.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the vivo X100. While the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G might be more budget-friendly, the vivo X100 offers a drastically superior experience in almost every way. The faster processor, significantly better display, more versatile camera system, larger battery with much faster charging, and a larger and newer storage make it a worthwhile investment for anyone who wants a high-performance smartphone.

The vivo X100 represents a much more complete package for modern smartphone use. The only real trade-off is its slightly heavier build and a less defined screen protection rating, but the massive advantages in performance, camera, display, and battery life outweigh these minor issues. For users who want a device that can handle anything thrown at it while providing a high-quality media consumption and capture experience, the vivo X100 is the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.