Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A25
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Samsung Galaxy A25 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 161 × 76.5 × 8.3 mm | A25 is slightly taller and wider; A52 5G is negligibly thicker, might affect one-handed use. |
| Weight | 189g | 197g | A52 5G is slightly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.5" | Identical screen size for both. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Virtually identical sharpness; differences are negligible in daily use. |
| PPI | 407 | 396 | Virtually identical pixel density - sharpness differences are not visible in daily use. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Identical vibrant colors and deep blacks; both offer great viewing experience. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Identical smooth scrolling and animation in both. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | A25 is significantly brighter, offering much better visibility in direct sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) | Exynos 1280 (5nm) | A25's newer 5nm chip offers better power efficiency and general performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 480,688 | A25 is 25% faster for smoother multitasking, quicker app loading and better gaming performance |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 | A25's Mali-G68 has significantly better performance in GPU intensive tasks. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8 | A52 5G has higher resolution primary camera, potentially more detail in good lighting, but the A25's larger pixels may result in better low light performance. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.8µm | 13MP, f/2.2 | A52 5G has higher resolution front camera, potentially capturing more detail in selfies. |
| Wide Angle | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", Samsung S5K3L6, 1.12µm | 8MP, f/2.2 | A52 5G has a higher resolution wide angle lens for capturing more detail. |
| Portrait (Depth) | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 5G has a dedicated depth sensor with higher resolution; may produce better bokeh effects. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | A52 5G can take dedicated macro shots; A25 lacks this functionality. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps, EIS, Slow-motion 120fps | Up to 4K@30fps, EIS, Slow-motion 480fps | Both record 4K, but A25 has significantly faster slow-motion capture. |
| DxOMark | Not Tested | Mobile: 92, Photo: 98, Video: 94 | A25's camera quality is rated by DxOMark, providing a benchmark. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera, Ultra stable video, Manual focus, Night Mode | Triple camera, PDAF, Continuous shooting | A52 5G has manual camera controls and a dedicated night mode, A25 has faster focusing and continuous shooting. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | A25 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 25W fast charging | Both phones have identical fast charging speed. |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Ion | Minor difference in battery chemistry, but no practical difference in daily use. |
| Software & Connectivity | |||
| OS | Android 11, Upgradable to 14 | Android 14, Upgradable to 18 | A25 ships with a newer version of Android and has a longer software support, likely offering better user experience. |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Identical Wi-Fi standards for both. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 | A25 has a newer, more efficient Bluetooth version, offering better connectivity and features. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | A25 supports more satellite systems, potentially more accurate location tracking. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano) | Identical dual SIM functionality. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Identical storage options. |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 6GB/8GB | Identical RAM options for smooth multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | No storage expansion option in either phone. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | A25 offers more immersive audio experience with stereo speakers. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | A25 has a faster, more convenient side-mounted sensor for unlocking. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Identical screen protection for both phones. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Biometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Both phones have all the common sensors. A25's proximity sensor is ultrasonic, which is different from A52 5G's standard proximity sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Higher Resolution Cameras: Higher resolution main, ultrawide, and selfie cameras for potentially more detailed photos and videos.
- Dedicated Macro Lens: Can capture close-up macro shots, not available on A25.
- Manual camera controls: Additional manual camera control features and a night mode.
- Wider support of Bluetooth profiles Provides a wider range of audio functionalities, and more versatility.
- Standard proximity sensor: While the ultrasonic sensor on the A25 is more advanced, some users may prefer a standard proximity sensor as it is more reliable in everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:
- Newer and More Powerful Chipset: Exynos 1280 offers a significant performance improvement (25% higher AnTuTu) and better efficiency over the Snapdragon 750G.
- Brighter Display: 1000 nits brightness for superior outdoor visibility.
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery for longer usage between charges.
- Significantly Faster Slow Motion Recording: 480fps slow-motion for capturing highly detailed action.
- Newer Software: Ships with Android 14 and is eligible for more future updates.
- Stereo Speakers: More immersive audio with stereo speakers.
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Convenient and reliable unlocking method.
- DxOMark camera rating: Provides a concrete benchmark of camera quality
Trade-offs:
- The A52 5G offers better camera resolution and a macro lens, but loses out on performance, screen brightness, battery, software, audio quality and fingerprint sensor quality.
- The A25 provides better performance, battery and a brighter display, but sacrifices camera features such as the macro lens and manual controls, and resolution in general.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Ideal User:
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize higher resolution photos, and a dedicated macro lens.
- Users of older tech: Users who want to have the basic proximity sensor
- Users who prefer manual camera controls: Users who want manual camera controls to fine tune their shots.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Use Cases:
- Detailed landscape and portrait photography.
- Close-up photography with the macro lens.
- Capturing images in various lighting conditions using night mode.
Samsung Galaxy A25 Ideal User:
- Performance-Focused User: Gamers or users who multitask heavily and need a smoother, faster device.
- Outdoor Users: People who need a bright display for outdoor visibility.
- Long Battery Life Seekers: Users who prioritize battery life.
- Video Creators: Users who record lots of slow-motion videos.
- Audio Enthusiasts: Users who listen to music or watch videos often and want an immersive sound experience.
Samsung Galaxy A25 Use Cases:
- Playing graphically demanding mobile games.
- Watching videos or using apps in bright sunlight.
- Extended usage throughout the day without frequent charging.
- Creating high-quality slow-motion videos.
- Casual photography and videography
- Listening to music, watching videos and podcasts.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The A25 offers a better price-to-value ratio with its improved performance, brighter screen, larger battery, and newer software. It is more modern and relevant for current use cases.
- The A52 5G is older, but might be slightly cheaper on the used market, still offering good camera performance for photography focused users.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Do you prioritize performance and battery life over everything? If yes, the A25 is the better choice with its superior chipset and larger battery.
- Do you need a very bright screen and immersive audio? If yes, the A25 is the clear winner with its 1000 nits display and stereo speakers.
- Is photography your main focus? If so the A52 5G could be a better choice.
- Do you need a macro lens? If so the A52 5G is the only option.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For Mobile Gamers: The Samsung Galaxy A25 is the better choice due to its superior performance and battery life.
- For Outdoor Users: The Samsung Galaxy A25 is recommended for its 1000 nits display, which offers excellent visibility in direct sunlight.
- For Photography Enthusiasts: The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the better choice, thanks to its higher resolution cameras, and its dedicated macro lens.
- For General Users: The Samsung Galaxy A25 offers better value with its balanced performance, bright screen, and newer software, making it a more versatile daily driver.
Personal Choice:
If I had to choose, I would go with the Samsung Galaxy A25. Despite the slightly lower resolution main camera and the lack of a macro lens, the overall package is more compelling. The combination of a significantly faster processor, a much brighter display, longer battery life, newer software, and stereo speakers makes it a much better phone for my needs and more future proof than the A52 5G. The better performance is a major advantage that will impact daily usage, while the camera differences are less crucial for me. The convenience of a side-mounted fingerprint sensor and the significantly faster slow-motion video capability is also a plus.
